房内注射曲安奈德和结膜下注射地塞米松后的内皮损失。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1080/15569527.2023.2239897
Fatma Sali, Veysel Aykut, Ahmad Kunbaz, Ebubekir Durmus, Mustafa Hepokur, Halit Oguz, Fehim Esen
{"title":"房内注射曲安奈德和结膜下注射地塞米松后的内皮损失。","authors":"Fatma Sali,&nbsp;Veysel Aykut,&nbsp;Ahmad Kunbaz,&nbsp;Ebubekir Durmus,&nbsp;Mustafa Hepokur,&nbsp;Halit Oguz,&nbsp;Fehim Esen","doi":"10.1080/15569527.2023.2239897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare endothelial toxicity and efficacy of two local steroid injections (intracameral triamcinolone acetonide and subconjunctival dexamethasone) in controlling postoperative inflammation following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort included 54 patients that underwent combined surgery and received either intracameral triamcinolone acetonide injections (<i>n</i> = 27, IC-TA group) or subconjunctival dexamethasone (<i>n</i> = 27, Sc-Dex group) injections at the end of the surgery. All participants had at least 4 months or longer follow-up. A detailed ophthalmologic examination including intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement and specular microscopy was performed at every visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Endothelial cell density (ECD) reduced significantly in IC-TA group postoperatively (2418 vs. 2249, <i>p</i> = 0.019), while it did not change significantly in Sc-Dex group (2541 vs. 2492, <i>p</i> = 0.247). Postoperative ECD was also significantly lower in IC-TA group compared to Sc-Dex group (<i>p</i> = 0.011). Preoperative and postoperative IOP values remained unchanged both in IC-TA and Sc-Dex groups (<i>p</i> = 0.424 and <i>p</i> = 0.523, respectively). However, 4 patients in IC-TA group and 5 patients in the Sc-Dex group needed glaucoma medications. The postoperative need for glaucoma medications was similar between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.347). Postoperative inflammation was well controlled in both groups and none of the patients developed fibrin membrane or synechiae postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both treatments were effective in controlling postoperative inflammation, but patients in IC-TA group experienced significantly higher endothelial loss. Sc-Dex injections are safer in terms of endothelial loss and preferable to control postoperative inflammation following complex intraocular surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":11023,"journal":{"name":"Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endothelial loss following postoperative intracameral triamcinolone acetonide and subconjunctival dexamethasone injections.\",\"authors\":\"Fatma Sali,&nbsp;Veysel Aykut,&nbsp;Ahmad Kunbaz,&nbsp;Ebubekir Durmus,&nbsp;Mustafa Hepokur,&nbsp;Halit Oguz,&nbsp;Fehim Esen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15569527.2023.2239897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare endothelial toxicity and efficacy of two local steroid injections (intracameral triamcinolone acetonide and subconjunctival dexamethasone) in controlling postoperative inflammation following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort included 54 patients that underwent combined surgery and received either intracameral triamcinolone acetonide injections (<i>n</i> = 27, IC-TA group) or subconjunctival dexamethasone (<i>n</i> = 27, Sc-Dex group) injections at the end of the surgery. All participants had at least 4 months or longer follow-up. A detailed ophthalmologic examination including intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement and specular microscopy was performed at every visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Endothelial cell density (ECD) reduced significantly in IC-TA group postoperatively (2418 vs. 2249, <i>p</i> = 0.019), while it did not change significantly in Sc-Dex group (2541 vs. 2492, <i>p</i> = 0.247). Postoperative ECD was also significantly lower in IC-TA group compared to Sc-Dex group (<i>p</i> = 0.011). Preoperative and postoperative IOP values remained unchanged both in IC-TA and Sc-Dex groups (<i>p</i> = 0.424 and <i>p</i> = 0.523, respectively). However, 4 patients in IC-TA group and 5 patients in the Sc-Dex group needed glaucoma medications. The postoperative need for glaucoma medications was similar between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.347). Postoperative inflammation was well controlled in both groups and none of the patients developed fibrin membrane or synechiae postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both treatments were effective in controlling postoperative inflammation, but patients in IC-TA group experienced significantly higher endothelial loss. Sc-Dex injections are safer in terms of endothelial loss and preferable to control postoperative inflammation following complex intraocular surgeries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15569527.2023.2239897\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15569527.2023.2239897","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较两种局部类固醇注射(房内曲安奈德和结膜下地塞米松)在控制平坦部玻璃体切除术(PPV)联合超声乳化白内障手术后炎症方面的内皮毒性和疗效。方法:该队列包括54名接受联合手术并接受房内注射曲安奈德(n = 27、IC-TA组)或结膜下地塞米松(n = 27、Sc-Dex组)注射。所有参与者都进行了至少4个月或更长时间的随访。每次就诊时都要进行详细的眼科检查,包括眼压(IOP)测量和镜面显微镜检查。结果:IC-TA组术后内皮细胞密度(ECD)显著降低(2418 vs.2249,p = 0.019),而Sc-Dex组没有显著变化(2541对2492,p = 术后ECD在IC-TA组明显低于Sc-Dex组(p = 0.011)。IC-TA组和Sc-Dex组术前和术后眼压值均保持不变(p = 0.424和p = 分别为0.523)。然而,IC-TA组的4名患者和Sc-Dex组的5名患者需要青光眼药物治疗。两组患者术后对青光眼药物的需求相似(p = 0.347)。两组患者术后炎症均得到很好的控制,术后均未出现纤维蛋白膜或粘连。结论:两种治疗方法均能有效控制术后炎症,但IC-TA组患者的内皮细胞损失明显增加。Sc-Dex注射在内皮损失方面更安全,并且更适合控制复杂眼内手术后的术后炎症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endothelial loss following postoperative intracameral triamcinolone acetonide and subconjunctival dexamethasone injections.

Objectives: To compare endothelial toxicity and efficacy of two local steroid injections (intracameral triamcinolone acetonide and subconjunctival dexamethasone) in controlling postoperative inflammation following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

Methods: This cohort included 54 patients that underwent combined surgery and received either intracameral triamcinolone acetonide injections (n = 27, IC-TA group) or subconjunctival dexamethasone (n = 27, Sc-Dex group) injections at the end of the surgery. All participants had at least 4 months or longer follow-up. A detailed ophthalmologic examination including intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement and specular microscopy was performed at every visit.

Results: Endothelial cell density (ECD) reduced significantly in IC-TA group postoperatively (2418 vs. 2249, p = 0.019), while it did not change significantly in Sc-Dex group (2541 vs. 2492, p = 0.247). Postoperative ECD was also significantly lower in IC-TA group compared to Sc-Dex group (p = 0.011). Preoperative and postoperative IOP values remained unchanged both in IC-TA and Sc-Dex groups (p = 0.424 and p = 0.523, respectively). However, 4 patients in IC-TA group and 5 patients in the Sc-Dex group needed glaucoma medications. The postoperative need for glaucoma medications was similar between the groups (p = 0.347). Postoperative inflammation was well controlled in both groups and none of the patients developed fibrin membrane or synechiae postoperatively.

Conclusion: Both treatments were effective in controlling postoperative inflammation, but patients in IC-TA group experienced significantly higher endothelial loss. Sc-Dex injections are safer in terms of endothelial loss and preferable to control postoperative inflammation following complex intraocular surgeries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
40
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology is an international, peer-reviewed journal that covers all types of harm to cutaneous and ocular systems. Areas of particular interest include pharmaceutical and medical products; consumer, personal care, and household products; and issues in environmental and occupational exposures. In addition to original research papers, reviews and short communications are invited, as well as concise, relevant, and critical reviews of topics of contemporary significance.
期刊最新文献
A national analysis of systemic adverse events of beta-blockers used for glaucoma therapy. Effect Of Pentavalent Antimony Compounds On The İnflammatory, Hematological and Biochemical Parameters İn Patients With Cutaneous Leishmaniasis The Effect of Adrenaline and Trypan Blue Used During Cataract Surgery on Anatomical and Functional Outcomes in Pseudoexfoliation Syndrome Patients. Efficacy and safety of self-made WenyangJianpi-qushi Decoction combined with mometasone furoate cream in the treatment of atopic dermatitis of spleen deficiency and dampness accumulation type. Ocular effects of eye cosmetic formulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1