美国黑人妇女接受和采用暴露前预防疗法 (PrEP) 的障碍和促进因素:系统综述。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-02 DOI:10.1007/s40615-023-01729-9
Frerik Smit, Tsitsi B Masvawure
{"title":"美国黑人妇女接受和采用暴露前预防疗法 (PrEP) 的障碍和促进因素:系统综述。","authors":"Frerik Smit, Tsitsi B Masvawure","doi":"10.1007/s40615-023-01729-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provides a salient avenue to address the profound HIV-related health disparities that Black women in the United States face. This systematic review assessed the acceptability of PrEP within this population, and identified barriers and facilitators to its acceptability and uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed and Web of Science using 48 search input combinations; this produced 338 unique articles, 16 of which were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed the results using the socio-ecological model (SEM). Findings indicate generally positive attitudes towards PrEP among Black women, although acceptance levels vary widely. Individual-level barriers included inadequate levels of PrEP awareness and knowledge, low HIV-risk perception, and concerns about adherence and side effects; interpersonal-level barriers were the influence of sexual and romantic partners and stigma from family; societal-level barriers included lack of PrEP marketing towards Black women, medical mistrust, cost, and structural violence. The main facilitators at the individual-level were PrEP education and information; at the interpersonal-level, distrust in sexual partners, healthcare provider encouragement, and social support; at the societal-level, PrEP accessibility, and affordability. No community-level barriers or facilitators were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PrEP should be marketed directly to Black women in the US and campaigns should highlight this medication's effectiveness, accessibility, affordability, and safety. Medical mistrust must also be addressed to enable Black women to feel comfortable following their healthcare providers' advice regarding PrEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Facilitators to Acceptability and Uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Black Women in the United States: a Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Frerik Smit, Tsitsi B Masvawure\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-023-01729-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provides a salient avenue to address the profound HIV-related health disparities that Black women in the United States face. This systematic review assessed the acceptability of PrEP within this population, and identified barriers and facilitators to its acceptability and uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed and Web of Science using 48 search input combinations; this produced 338 unique articles, 16 of which were included in the review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed the results using the socio-ecological model (SEM). Findings indicate generally positive attitudes towards PrEP among Black women, although acceptance levels vary widely. Individual-level barriers included inadequate levels of PrEP awareness and knowledge, low HIV-risk perception, and concerns about adherence and side effects; interpersonal-level barriers were the influence of sexual and romantic partners and stigma from family; societal-level barriers included lack of PrEP marketing towards Black women, medical mistrust, cost, and structural violence. The main facilitators at the individual-level were PrEP education and information; at the interpersonal-level, distrust in sexual partners, healthcare provider encouragement, and social support; at the societal-level, PrEP accessibility, and affordability. No community-level barriers or facilitators were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PrEP should be marketed directly to Black women in the US and campaigns should highlight this medication's effectiveness, accessibility, affordability, and safety. Medical mistrust must also be addressed to enable Black women to feel comfortable following their healthcare providers' advice regarding PrEP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01729-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-023-01729-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:接触前预防疗法(PrEP)为解决美国黑人妇女面临的与 HIV 相关的严重健康不平等问题提供了一个显著的途径。本系统性综述评估了该人群对 PrEP 的接受程度,并确定了影响其接受度和使用率的障碍和促进因素:我们使用 48 种搜索输入组合搜索了 PubMed 和 Web of Science,共搜索到 338 篇文章,其中 16 篇被纳入综述:我们使用社会生态模型(SEM)对结果进行了分析。研究结果表明,黑人女性对 PrEP 普遍持积极态度,但接受程度差异很大。个人层面的障碍包括对 PrEP 的认识和知识水平不足、对 HIV 风险的认知度低以及对依从性和副作用的担忧;人际层面的障碍包括性伴侣和恋爱伴侣的影响以及来自家庭的羞辱;社会层面的障碍包括缺乏针对黑人女性的 PrEP 营销、医疗不信任、成本和结构性暴力。个人层面的主要促进因素是 PrEP 教育和信息;人际层面的主要促进因素是对性伴侣的不信任、医疗服务提供者的鼓励和社会支持;社会层面的主要促进因素是 PrEP 的可及性和可负担性。没有发现社区层面的障碍或促进因素:结论:PrEP 应直接面向美国黑人女性进行营销,宣传活动应突出这种药物的有效性、可获得性、可负担性和安全性。此外,还必须解决对医疗的不信任问题,使黑人妇女能够放心地听从医疗服务提供者关于 PrEP 的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Barriers and Facilitators to Acceptability and Uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Among Black Women in the United States: a Systematic Review.

Objectives: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provides a salient avenue to address the profound HIV-related health disparities that Black women in the United States face. This systematic review assessed the acceptability of PrEP within this population, and identified barriers and facilitators to its acceptability and uptake.

Methods: We searched PubMed and Web of Science using 48 search input combinations; this produced 338 unique articles, 16 of which were included in the review.

Results: We analyzed the results using the socio-ecological model (SEM). Findings indicate generally positive attitudes towards PrEP among Black women, although acceptance levels vary widely. Individual-level barriers included inadequate levels of PrEP awareness and knowledge, low HIV-risk perception, and concerns about adherence and side effects; interpersonal-level barriers were the influence of sexual and romantic partners and stigma from family; societal-level barriers included lack of PrEP marketing towards Black women, medical mistrust, cost, and structural violence. The main facilitators at the individual-level were PrEP education and information; at the interpersonal-level, distrust in sexual partners, healthcare provider encouragement, and social support; at the societal-level, PrEP accessibility, and affordability. No community-level barriers or facilitators were identified.

Conclusions: PrEP should be marketed directly to Black women in the US and campaigns should highlight this medication's effectiveness, accessibility, affordability, and safety. Medical mistrust must also be addressed to enable Black women to feel comfortable following their healthcare providers' advice regarding PrEP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
期刊最新文献
Disparities in Patient Portal Activation and Usage at a Large Pediatric Academic Institution. Intersecting Epidemics: Examining the Impact of Internalized Homophobia and Depression Symptoms on HIV Testing Through a Suicide Syndemic Among Young Black Men Who Have Sex with Men. Socioeconomic Status, Social Support, and Quality of Life Among Black Adults. Bridging the Gap: Culturally Responsive Strategies for NIH Trial Recruitment. A Review of the Public Health Literature Examining the Roles of Socioeconomic Status and Race/Ethnicity on Health Outcomes in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1