无并发症经皮肾镜取石术后次日支架取出的事件和并发症与较长时间支架放置的比较。

Taylor Goodstein, Patrick Mershon, Tasha Posid, Aliza Khuhro, Mary Charleton, Amara Ndumele, Colin Kleinguetl, Chase Arnold, Bodo Knudsen, Michael Sourial
{"title":"无并发症经皮肾镜取石术后次日支架取出的事件和并发症与较长时间支架放置的比较。","authors":"Taylor Goodstein, Patrick Mershon, Tasha Posid, Aliza Khuhro, Mary Charleton, Amara Ndumele, Colin Kleinguetl, Chase Arnold, Bodo Knudsen, Michael Sourial","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Options for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) vary and depend primarily on surgeon preference and case considerations. In our practice, patients traditionally returned one week postoperatively to remove the stents in the office via cystoscopy; however, following uncomplicated PCNL with no plans for second-look procedure, a ureteral stent on a tether is currently removed in tandem with the Foley catheter on postoperative day 1 (POD1) prior to patient discharge. This study compared the number of postoperative events between POD1 stent removal and their longer stented counterparts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients who had undergone PCNL at our institution from January 1, 2020, to June 31, 2021. Patient demographics, operative metrics, and postoperative events (telephone calls, emergency department [ED ]/clinic visits, and complications) were recorded and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 243 patients were included in final analysis: 46% (n=111) had their stent removed on POD1 and 54% (n=132) had longer indwelling stent times. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. Number of telephone calls (p=0.081), ED /clinic visits (p=0.093), and complications (p=0.647) were similar between groups. There were three (1.3%) unplanned second-look procedures: two (1.8%) in the POD1 stent removal group and one (0.8%, p=0.475) in the later stent removal group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this limited, retrospective study, we did not detect a difference in postoperative events or short-term complications for POD1 vs. later stent removal after uncomplicated PCNL.</p>","PeriodicalId":9574,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","volume":" ","pages":"E381-E387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657223/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative events and complications of next-day stent removal following uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy compared to longer stenting.\",\"authors\":\"Taylor Goodstein, Patrick Mershon, Tasha Posid, Aliza Khuhro, Mary Charleton, Amara Ndumele, Colin Kleinguetl, Chase Arnold, Bodo Knudsen, Michael Sourial\",\"doi\":\"10.5489/cuaj.8364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Options for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) vary and depend primarily on surgeon preference and case considerations. In our practice, patients traditionally returned one week postoperatively to remove the stents in the office via cystoscopy; however, following uncomplicated PCNL with no plans for second-look procedure, a ureteral stent on a tether is currently removed in tandem with the Foley catheter on postoperative day 1 (POD1) prior to patient discharge. This study compared the number of postoperative events between POD1 stent removal and their longer stented counterparts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients who had undergone PCNL at our institution from January 1, 2020, to June 31, 2021. Patient demographics, operative metrics, and postoperative events (telephone calls, emergency department [ED ]/clinic visits, and complications) were recorded and compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 243 patients were included in final analysis: 46% (n=111) had their stent removed on POD1 and 54% (n=132) had longer indwelling stent times. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. Number of telephone calls (p=0.081), ED /clinic visits (p=0.093), and complications (p=0.647) were similar between groups. There were three (1.3%) unplanned second-look procedures: two (1.8%) in the POD1 stent removal group and one (0.8%, p=0.475) in the later stent removal group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this limited, retrospective study, we did not detect a difference in postoperative events or short-term complications for POD1 vs. later stent removal after uncomplicated PCNL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"E381-E387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10657223/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)后肾引流的选择不同,主要取决于外科医生的偏好和病例考虑。在我们的实践中,患者通常在术后一周返回办公室通过膀胱镜取出支架;然而,对于无并发症的PCNL患者,在术后第1天(POD1)出院前,将输尿管支架系绳与Foley导管一起取出。本研究比较了POD1支架移除与长时间支架移除之间的术后事件数量。方法:我们对2020年1月1日至2021年6月31日在我院接受PCNL的所有患者进行回顾性图表回顾。记录并比较两组患者的人口统计、手术指标和术后事件(电话呼叫、急诊科[ED]/门诊就诊和并发症)。结果:243例患者纳入最终分析:46% (n=111)患者在POD1移除支架,54% (n=132)患者延长支架留置时间。两组的基线人口统计数据相似。两组之间的电话次数(p=0.081)、急诊科/门诊就诊次数(p=0.093)和并发症(p=0.647)相似。有3例(1.3%)非计划的二次检查手术:2例(1.8%)在POD1支架移除组,1例(0.8%,p=0.475)在晚支架移除组。结论:在这项有限的回顾性研究中,我们没有发现POD1与无并发症PCNL术后支架取出的术后事件或短期并发症的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Postoperative events and complications of next-day stent removal following uncomplicated percutaneous nephrolithotomy compared to longer stenting.

Introduction: Options for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) vary and depend primarily on surgeon preference and case considerations. In our practice, patients traditionally returned one week postoperatively to remove the stents in the office via cystoscopy; however, following uncomplicated PCNL with no plans for second-look procedure, a ureteral stent on a tether is currently removed in tandem with the Foley catheter on postoperative day 1 (POD1) prior to patient discharge. This study compared the number of postoperative events between POD1 stent removal and their longer stented counterparts.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients who had undergone PCNL at our institution from January 1, 2020, to June 31, 2021. Patient demographics, operative metrics, and postoperative events (telephone calls, emergency department [ED ]/clinic visits, and complications) were recorded and compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 243 patients were included in final analysis: 46% (n=111) had their stent removed on POD1 and 54% (n=132) had longer indwelling stent times. Baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. Number of telephone calls (p=0.081), ED /clinic visits (p=0.093), and complications (p=0.647) were similar between groups. There were three (1.3%) unplanned second-look procedures: two (1.8%) in the POD1 stent removal group and one (0.8%, p=0.475) in the later stent removal group.

Conclusions: In this limited, retrospective study, we did not detect a difference in postoperative events or short-term complications for POD1 vs. later stent removal after uncomplicated PCNL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment modalities for small-sized urolithiases and their impact on health-related quality of life. Pilot study to assess the feasibility of self-administered, low-dose methoxyflurane for cystoscopic procedures. An analysis of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical treatment reimbursement trends across Canada: Examining provincial changes over the recent decade with comparison to cost of living changes. Restricted access and advanced disease in post-pandemic testicular cancer. Comparison of outcomes in patients with and without neurologic diseases undergoing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1