长期护理中心中患有严重神经认知障碍的老年人疗养院短期抑郁量表的外部验证。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-14 DOI:10.1159/000533357
Élodie Toulouse, Daphnée Carrier, Maire-Pier Villemure, Jessika Roy Desruisseaux, Christian M Rochefort
{"title":"长期护理中心中患有严重神经认知障碍的老年人疗养院短期抑郁量表的外部验证。","authors":"Élodie Toulouse,&nbsp;Daphnée Carrier,&nbsp;Maire-Pier Villemure,&nbsp;Jessika Roy Desruisseaux,&nbsp;Christian M Rochefort","doi":"10.1159/000533357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Depression is often difficult to detect in long-term care (LTC) patients with major neurocognitive disorders (MNCD), and an observer-rated screening scale could facilitate assessments. This study aimed to establish the external validity and reliability of the Nursing Homes Short Depression Inventory (NH-SDI) in LTC patients with MNCD and to compare its estimates to the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), the most used scale for depression in MNCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A focus discussion group of experts assessed the content validity of the NH-SDI. Then, a convenience sample of 93 LTC patients with MNCD was observer-rated by trained nurses with the NH-SDI and CSDD. For 57 patients, a medical assessment of depression was obtained, and screening accuracy estimates were generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of depression was 8.8% as per reference standard. NH-SDI's content validity was judged acceptable with minor item wording modifications and specifications. The NH-SDI (cut-off ≥3) achieved 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46-100%) sensitivity, 83% (95% CI: 69-91%) specificity, and 36% (95% CI: 14-64%) positive predictive value (PPV). The CSDD (cut-off ≥3) achieved 100% (95% CI: 46-100%) sensitivity, 75% (95% CI: 61-86%) specificity, and 28% (95% CI: 11-54%) PPV. No significant differences in areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were found between scales. The NH-SDI and CSDD were highly correlated (rs = 0.913; p &lt; 0.001) and reliable (ICC = 0.77; p &lt; 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NH-SDI appears valid and reliable in LTC patients with MNCD and quicker than the CSDD to rule out depression in a busy or short-staffed setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"267-276"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The External Validation of the Nursing Homes Short Depression Inventory in Older Adults with Major Neurocognitive Disorders in Long-Term Care Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Élodie Toulouse,&nbsp;Daphnée Carrier,&nbsp;Maire-Pier Villemure,&nbsp;Jessika Roy Desruisseaux,&nbsp;Christian M Rochefort\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000533357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Depression is often difficult to detect in long-term care (LTC) patients with major neurocognitive disorders (MNCD), and an observer-rated screening scale could facilitate assessments. This study aimed to establish the external validity and reliability of the Nursing Homes Short Depression Inventory (NH-SDI) in LTC patients with MNCD and to compare its estimates to the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), the most used scale for depression in MNCD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A focus discussion group of experts assessed the content validity of the NH-SDI. Then, a convenience sample of 93 LTC patients with MNCD was observer-rated by trained nurses with the NH-SDI and CSDD. For 57 patients, a medical assessment of depression was obtained, and screening accuracy estimates were generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of depression was 8.8% as per reference standard. NH-SDI's content validity was judged acceptable with minor item wording modifications and specifications. The NH-SDI (cut-off ≥3) achieved 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46-100%) sensitivity, 83% (95% CI: 69-91%) specificity, and 36% (95% CI: 14-64%) positive predictive value (PPV). The CSDD (cut-off ≥3) achieved 100% (95% CI: 46-100%) sensitivity, 75% (95% CI: 61-86%) specificity, and 28% (95% CI: 11-54%) PPV. No significant differences in areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were found between scales. The NH-SDI and CSDD were highly correlated (rs = 0.913; p &lt; 0.001) and reliable (ICC = 0.77; p &lt; 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The NH-SDI appears valid and reliable in LTC patients with MNCD and quicker than the CSDD to rule out depression in a busy or short-staffed setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"267-276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10614225/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533357\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:患有严重神经认知障碍(MNCD)的长期护理(LTC)患者通常很难发现抑郁症,观察者评分的筛查量表可以促进评估。本研究旨在建立疗养院短期抑郁量表(NH-SDI)在患有MNCD的LTC患者中的外部有效性和可靠性,并将其估计值与MNCD中最常用的抑郁量表康奈尔痴呆症抑郁量表进行比较。然后,由受过NH-SDI和CSDD培训的护士对93名患有MNCD的LTC患者进行观察者评分。对57名患者进行了抑郁症的医学评估,并对筛查准确性进行了估计。结果:对照组抑郁症患病率为8.8%。NH-SDI的内容有效性被判定为可接受,并对项目措辞和规范进行了细微修改。NH-SDI(临界值≥3)的敏感性为100%(95%置信区间[CI]:46-100%),特异性为83%(95%CI:69-91%),阳性预测值(PPV)为36%(95%CI:14-64%)。CSDD(临界值≥3)的敏感性为100%(95%CI:46-100%),特异性为75%(95%CI:61-86%),PPV为28%(95%CI:11-54%)。在两个量表之间,接收器工作特性曲线下的面积没有发现显著差异。NH-SDI和CSDD高度相关(rs=0.913;p<;0.001)且可靠(ICC=0.77;p&llt;0.001)。结论:NH-SDI在患有MNCD的LTC患者中有效且可靠,并且在繁忙或人手不足的环境中比CSDD更快地排除抑郁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The External Validation of the Nursing Homes Short Depression Inventory in Older Adults with Major Neurocognitive Disorders in Long-Term Care Centers.

Introduction: Depression is often difficult to detect in long-term care (LTC) patients with major neurocognitive disorders (MNCD), and an observer-rated screening scale could facilitate assessments. This study aimed to establish the external validity and reliability of the Nursing Homes Short Depression Inventory (NH-SDI) in LTC patients with MNCD and to compare its estimates to the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), the most used scale for depression in MNCD.

Methods: A focus discussion group of experts assessed the content validity of the NH-SDI. Then, a convenience sample of 93 LTC patients with MNCD was observer-rated by trained nurses with the NH-SDI and CSDD. For 57 patients, a medical assessment of depression was obtained, and screening accuracy estimates were generated.

Results: The prevalence of depression was 8.8% as per reference standard. NH-SDI's content validity was judged acceptable with minor item wording modifications and specifications. The NH-SDI (cut-off ≥3) achieved 100% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46-100%) sensitivity, 83% (95% CI: 69-91%) specificity, and 36% (95% CI: 14-64%) positive predictive value (PPV). The CSDD (cut-off ≥3) achieved 100% (95% CI: 46-100%) sensitivity, 75% (95% CI: 61-86%) specificity, and 28% (95% CI: 11-54%) PPV. No significant differences in areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were found between scales. The NH-SDI and CSDD were highly correlated (rs = 0.913; p < 0.001) and reliable (ICC = 0.77; p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The NH-SDI appears valid and reliable in LTC patients with MNCD and quicker than the CSDD to rule out depression in a busy or short-staffed setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
期刊最新文献
Diversity in United States dementia prevention trials: An updated systematic review of eligibility criteria and recruitment strategies. Erratum. Structural neuroimaging correlates of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic literature review. Longitudinal analysis of objective and self-reported cognitive functions in individuals with subjective cognitive decline. The mediating effect of depressive symptoms between frailty and cognitive impairment in the Northeast Chinese older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1