西班牙语版EQ-i: YV量表在哥伦比亚儿童和青少年中的效度和信度[S]。

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Psychological Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.21500/20112084.5677
Claudia P Navarro-Roldán, Sandra Mateus-Gómez, Catalina Botero Ruge, Gabriel Velez
{"title":"西班牙语版EQ-i: YV量表在哥伦比亚儿童和青少年中的效度和信度[S]。","authors":"Claudia P Navarro-Roldán,&nbsp;Sandra Mateus-Gómez,&nbsp;Catalina Botero Ruge,&nbsp;Gabriel Velez","doi":"10.21500/20112084.5677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Validity and reliability evaluations of the Emotional Quotient Inventory: Youth Version (EQ-i: YV[S]) with children and adolescents from different countries have shown variations in the structural model proposed by Bar-On.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the psychometric properties of EQ-i: YV[S] with a Colombian' sample.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We randomly selected a sample of 1355 children and adolescents between 8 and 14 years old (M<sub>age</sub> = 10.80; SD = 1.41). We conducted exploratory (n<sub>1</sub> = 416) and confirmatory (n<sub>2</sub> = 939) factor analyses (EFA, CFA), reliability, internal consistency, and predictive validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA explained 27.6% of the variance. The AFC indicated a multidimensional structure with four factors and 21 items obtained the best fit (χ<sup>2</sup> = 334.358; df = 183; RMSEA=0.030; CFI=.951; TLI=944; NFI=.899) with acceptable internal consistency (ω = .57,.75). EQ-i: YV[S] factors explain 18.5% of the observed variance in problem-centered coping scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The psychometric fit of the inventory supports evidence of its usefulness for screening processes in clinical or educational assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":46542,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychological Research","volume":"16 1","pages":"29-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ea/21/2011-2084-ijpr-16-01-29.PMC10402643.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of Spanish version of the EQ-i: YV[S] in Colombian children and youth.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia P Navarro-Roldán,&nbsp;Sandra Mateus-Gómez,&nbsp;Catalina Botero Ruge,&nbsp;Gabriel Velez\",\"doi\":\"10.21500/20112084.5677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Validity and reliability evaluations of the Emotional Quotient Inventory: Youth Version (EQ-i: YV[S]) with children and adolescents from different countries have shown variations in the structural model proposed by Bar-On.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the psychometric properties of EQ-i: YV[S] with a Colombian' sample.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We randomly selected a sample of 1355 children and adolescents between 8 and 14 years old (M<sub>age</sub> = 10.80; SD = 1.41). We conducted exploratory (n<sub>1</sub> = 416) and confirmatory (n<sub>2</sub> = 939) factor analyses (EFA, CFA), reliability, internal consistency, and predictive validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EFA explained 27.6% of the variance. The AFC indicated a multidimensional structure with four factors and 21 items obtained the best fit (χ<sup>2</sup> = 334.358; df = 183; RMSEA=0.030; CFI=.951; TLI=944; NFI=.899) with acceptable internal consistency (ω = .57,.75). EQ-i: YV[S] factors explain 18.5% of the observed variance in problem-centered coping scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The psychometric fit of the inventory supports evidence of its usefulness for screening processes in clinical or educational assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychological Research\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"29-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ea/21/2011-2084-ijpr-16-01-29.PMC10402643.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5677\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5677","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:不同国家的儿童和青少年的情商量表(EQ-i: YV[S])的效度和信度评估在Bar-On提出的结构模型上存在差异。目的:以哥伦比亚人为样本,探讨eq - 1: YV[S]的心理测量特征。方法:随机抽取8 ~ 14岁儿童青少年1355例(Mage = 10.80;Sd = 1.41)。我们进行了探索性(n1 = 416)和验证性(n2 = 939)因素分析(EFA, CFA)、信度、内部一致性和预测效度。结果:EFA解释了27.6%的方差。AFC呈多维结构,有4个因素,其中21项拟合最佳(χ2 = 334.358;Df = 183;RMSEA = 0.030;CFI = .951;TLI = 944;NFI=.899),内部一致性可接受(ω =. 57,.75)。eq - 1: YV[S]因子解释了18.5%的以问题为中心的应对得分差异。结论:该量表的心理测量契合度支持其在临床或教育评估筛选过程中有用的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity and reliability of Spanish version of the EQ-i: YV[S] in Colombian children and youth.

Introduction: Validity and reliability evaluations of the Emotional Quotient Inventory: Youth Version (EQ-i: YV[S]) with children and adolescents from different countries have shown variations in the structural model proposed by Bar-On.

Objective: To examine the psychometric properties of EQ-i: YV[S] with a Colombian' sample.

Method: We randomly selected a sample of 1355 children and adolescents between 8 and 14 years old (Mage = 10.80; SD = 1.41). We conducted exploratory (n1 = 416) and confirmatory (n2 = 939) factor analyses (EFA, CFA), reliability, internal consistency, and predictive validity.

Results: The EFA explained 27.6% of the variance. The AFC indicated a multidimensional structure with four factors and 21 items obtained the best fit (χ2 = 334.358; df = 183; RMSEA=0.030; CFI=.951; TLI=944; NFI=.899) with acceptable internal consistency (ω = .57,.75). EQ-i: YV[S] factors explain 18.5% of the observed variance in problem-centered coping scores.

Conclusions: The psychometric fit of the inventory supports evidence of its usefulness for screening processes in clinical or educational assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychological Research
International Journal of Psychological Research PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychological Research (Int.j.psychol.res) is the Faculty of Psychology’s official publication of San Buenaventura University in Medellin, Colombia. Int.j.psychol.res relies on a vast and diverse theoretical and thematic publishing material, which includes unpublished productions of diverse psychological issues and behavioral human areas such as psychiatry, neurosciences, mental health, among others.
期刊最新文献
Voluntary Ethanol Intake and Anxiety Behavior in Wistar-Uis Rats. Gaslighting Exposure During Emerging Adulthood: Personality Traits and Vulnerability Paths. Validity and Internal Consistency of a Spanish Version of the Cognitive Flexibil ity Scale (CFS). Attitudes of the Host Population towards Syrian Refugees: A New Theoretical Perspective Translation of Well-being Assessment Instruments in African Contexts: A Mapping Review and Future Directions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1