通过CRISPR-Cas9核糖核蛋白(RNP)电穿孔产生双基因敲除牛。

IF 7 1区 农林科学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology Pub Date : 2023-08-06 DOI:10.1186/s40104-023-00902-8
Gyeong-Min Gim, Kyeong-Hyeon Eom, Dong-Hyeok Kwon, Dae-Jin Jung, Dae-Hyun Kim, Jun-Koo Yi, Jae-Jung Ha, Ji-Hyun Lee, Seong-Beom Lee, Woo-Jae Son, Soo-Young Yum, Won-Wu Lee, Goo Jang
{"title":"通过CRISPR-Cas9核糖核蛋白(RNP)电穿孔产生双基因敲除牛。","authors":"Gyeong-Min Gim,&nbsp;Kyeong-Hyeon Eom,&nbsp;Dong-Hyeok Kwon,&nbsp;Dae-Jin Jung,&nbsp;Dae-Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Jun-Koo Yi,&nbsp;Jae-Jung Ha,&nbsp;Ji-Hyun Lee,&nbsp;Seong-Beom Lee,&nbsp;Woo-Jae Son,&nbsp;Soo-Young Yum,&nbsp;Won-Wu Lee,&nbsp;Goo Jang","doi":"10.1186/s40104-023-00902-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genome editing has been considered as powerful tool in agricultural fields. However, genome editing progress in cattle has not been fast as in other mammal species, for some disadvantages including long gestational periods, single pregnancy, and high raising cost. Furthermore, technically demanding methods such as microinjection and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) are needed for gene editing in cattle. In this point of view, electroporation in embryos has been risen as an alternative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, editing efficiency of our electroporation methods were tested for embryos. Presence of mutation on embryo was confirmed by T7E1 assay. With first combination, mutation rates for MSTN and PRNP were 57.6% ± 13.7% and 54.6% ± 13.5%, respectively. In case of MSTN/BLG, mutation rates were 83.9% ± 23.6% for MSTN, 84.5% ± 18.0% for BLG. Afterwards, the double-KO embryos were transferred to surrogates and mutation rate was identified in resultant calves by targeted deep sequencing. Thirteen recipients were transferred for MSTN/PRNP, 4 calves were delivered, and one calf underwent an induction for double KO. Ten surrogates were given double-KO embryos for MSTN/BLG, and four of the six calves that were born had mutations in both genes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data demonstrated that production of genome edited cattle via electroporation of RNP could be effectively applied. Finally, MSTN and PRNP from beef cattle and MSTN and BLG from dairy cattle have been born and they will be valuable resources for future precision breeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":14928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology","volume":"14 1","pages":"103"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation.\",\"authors\":\"Gyeong-Min Gim,&nbsp;Kyeong-Hyeon Eom,&nbsp;Dong-Hyeok Kwon,&nbsp;Dae-Jin Jung,&nbsp;Dae-Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Jun-Koo Yi,&nbsp;Jae-Jung Ha,&nbsp;Ji-Hyun Lee,&nbsp;Seong-Beom Lee,&nbsp;Woo-Jae Son,&nbsp;Soo-Young Yum,&nbsp;Won-Wu Lee,&nbsp;Goo Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40104-023-00902-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genome editing has been considered as powerful tool in agricultural fields. However, genome editing progress in cattle has not been fast as in other mammal species, for some disadvantages including long gestational periods, single pregnancy, and high raising cost. Furthermore, technically demanding methods such as microinjection and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) are needed for gene editing in cattle. In this point of view, electroporation in embryos has been risen as an alternative.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, editing efficiency of our electroporation methods were tested for embryos. Presence of mutation on embryo was confirmed by T7E1 assay. With first combination, mutation rates for MSTN and PRNP were 57.6% ± 13.7% and 54.6% ± 13.5%, respectively. In case of MSTN/BLG, mutation rates were 83.9% ± 23.6% for MSTN, 84.5% ± 18.0% for BLG. Afterwards, the double-KO embryos were transferred to surrogates and mutation rate was identified in resultant calves by targeted deep sequencing. Thirteen recipients were transferred for MSTN/PRNP, 4 calves were delivered, and one calf underwent an induction for double KO. Ten surrogates were given double-KO embryos for MSTN/BLG, and four of the six calves that were born had mutations in both genes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data demonstrated that production of genome edited cattle via electroporation of RNP could be effectively applied. Finally, MSTN and PRNP from beef cattle and MSTN and BLG from dairy cattle have been born and they will be valuable resources for future precision breeding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10404370/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00902-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00902-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基因组编辑被认为是农业领域强有力的工具。然而,牛的基因组编辑进展并不像其他哺乳动物那样快,存在一些缺点,包括妊娠期长、单胎和饲养成本高。此外,牛的基因编辑还需要显微注射和体细胞核移植(SCNT)等技术要求很高的方法。从这个角度来看,胚胎电穿孔已成为一种替代方法。结果:首先,我们对胚胎电穿孔方法的编辑效率进行了测试。通过T7E1试验证实胚胎上存在突变。首次组合时,MSTN和PRNP的突变率分别为57.6%±13.7%和54.6%±13.5%。MSTN/BLG的突变率分别为83.9%±23.6%和84.5%±18.0%。随后,将双ko胚胎移植到代孕母体内,并通过靶向深度测序确定其在小牛中的突变率。13只受体被转移到MSTN/PRNP, 4头小牛被分娩,1头小牛接受了双KO诱导。为MSTN/BLG提供了10只代母猪的双ko胚胎,出生的6只小牛中有4只在两种基因上都有突变。结论:这些数据表明,通过RNP电穿孔生产基因组编辑牛是有效的。最后,获得了肉牛的MSTN和PRNP,以及奶牛的MSTN和BLG,它们将成为未来精准育种的宝贵资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generation of double knockout cattle via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) electroporation.

Background: Genome editing has been considered as powerful tool in agricultural fields. However, genome editing progress in cattle has not been fast as in other mammal species, for some disadvantages including long gestational periods, single pregnancy, and high raising cost. Furthermore, technically demanding methods such as microinjection and somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) are needed for gene editing in cattle. In this point of view, electroporation in embryos has been risen as an alternative.

Results: First, editing efficiency of our electroporation methods were tested for embryos. Presence of mutation on embryo was confirmed by T7E1 assay. With first combination, mutation rates for MSTN and PRNP were 57.6% ± 13.7% and 54.6% ± 13.5%, respectively. In case of MSTN/BLG, mutation rates were 83.9% ± 23.6% for MSTN, 84.5% ± 18.0% for BLG. Afterwards, the double-KO embryos were transferred to surrogates and mutation rate was identified in resultant calves by targeted deep sequencing. Thirteen recipients were transferred for MSTN/PRNP, 4 calves were delivered, and one calf underwent an induction for double KO. Ten surrogates were given double-KO embryos for MSTN/BLG, and four of the six calves that were born had mutations in both genes.

Conclusions: These data demonstrated that production of genome edited cattle via electroporation of RNP could be effectively applied. Finally, MSTN and PRNP from beef cattle and MSTN and BLG from dairy cattle have been born and they will be valuable resources for future precision breeding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
822
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of animal science and biotechnology. That includes domestic animal production, animal genetics and breeding, animal reproduction and physiology, animal nutrition and biochemistry, feed processing technology and bioevaluation, animal biotechnology, and meat science.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the dietary amino acid profiles and the relative biomarkers for amino acid balance in the low-protein diets for broiler chickens Bacteriocin Microcin J25’s antibacterial infection effects and novel non-microbial regulatory mechanisms: differential regulation of dopaminergic receptors Dietary bile acids supplementation protects against Salmonella Typhimurium infection via improving intestinal mucosal barrier and gut microbiota composition in broilers Correction: Dietary bile acids supplementation decreases hepatic fat deposition with the involvement of altered gut microbiota and liver bile acids profile in broiler chickens Comparative evaluation of the modulatory role of 1,25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3 on endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced effects in 2D and 3D cultures of the intestinal porcine epithelial cell line IPEC-J2
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1