Brandon J Goodwin, Rahyan Mahmud, Saumya TomThundyil, Gerardo Rivera-Colon, Victoria Wong Murray, Kelly O'Donnell
{"title":"脊髓刺激器减少多发性硬化症痉挛的疗效:一项叙述性系统综述。","authors":"Brandon J Goodwin, Rahyan Mahmud, Saumya TomThundyil, Gerardo Rivera-Colon, Victoria Wong Murray, Kelly O'Donnell","doi":"10.12786/bn.2023.16.e19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic review was employed utilizing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, to analyze all primary clinical data on the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) induced spasticity. Databases include: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science. The review included case series, case studies, and clinical trials. Outcomes of interest were spasticity reduction. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria was utilized to grade the certainty of evidence. Five hundred thirty-two articles were retrieved following database systematic review. One hundred eighty-eight articles were removed as duplicates utilizing the \"Detect Duplicates\" function on Rayyan.ai. A further 344 articles were excluded following abstract and title appraisal. As a result, 16 articles were subjected to full text appraisal. The dates of publication ranged from 1973 to 2019. Although a unique modality, there is not enough evidence to support the employment of SCS over current medical standard of care. Further high-quality randomized control trials are required to elucidate SCS's role in MS induced spasticity algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":72442,"journal":{"name":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"16 2","pages":"e19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fd/98/bn-16-e19.PMC10404813.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulators in the Reduction of Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity: A Narrative Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Brandon J Goodwin, Rahyan Mahmud, Saumya TomThundyil, Gerardo Rivera-Colon, Victoria Wong Murray, Kelly O'Donnell\",\"doi\":\"10.12786/bn.2023.16.e19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A systematic review was employed utilizing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, to analyze all primary clinical data on the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) induced spasticity. Databases include: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science. The review included case series, case studies, and clinical trials. Outcomes of interest were spasticity reduction. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria was utilized to grade the certainty of evidence. Five hundred thirty-two articles were retrieved following database systematic review. One hundred eighty-eight articles were removed as duplicates utilizing the \\\"Detect Duplicates\\\" function on Rayyan.ai. A further 344 articles were excluded following abstract and title appraisal. As a result, 16 articles were subjected to full text appraisal. The dates of publication ranged from 1973 to 2019. Although a unique modality, there is not enough evidence to support the employment of SCS over current medical standard of care. Further high-quality randomized control trials are required to elucidate SCS's role in MS induced spasticity algorithm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"e19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fd/98/bn-16-e19.PMC10404813.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2023.16.e19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12786/bn.2023.16.e19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
采用系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价,分析脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗多发性硬化症(MS)诱发痉挛疗效的所有主要临床数据。数据库包括:Embase、PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane和Web of Science。综述包括病例系列、病例研究和临床试验。关注的结果是痉挛减轻。评估、发展和评价标准用于对证据的确定性进行分级。通过数据库系统评价,检索到532篇文献。利用Rayyan.ai上的“检测副本”功能,188篇文章被删除为副本。另有344篇文章在摘要和标题鉴定后被排除。结果,16篇文章进行了全文评价。出版日期从1973年到2019年。虽然是一种独特的模式,但没有足够的证据支持SCS优于当前的医疗标准。需要进一步的高质量随机对照试验来阐明SCS在MS诱导的痉挛算法中的作用。
The Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulators in the Reduction of Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity: A Narrative Systematic Review.
A systematic review was employed utilizing Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, to analyze all primary clinical data on the efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) induced spasticity. Databases include: Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science. The review included case series, case studies, and clinical trials. Outcomes of interest were spasticity reduction. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria was utilized to grade the certainty of evidence. Five hundred thirty-two articles were retrieved following database systematic review. One hundred eighty-eight articles were removed as duplicates utilizing the "Detect Duplicates" function on Rayyan.ai. A further 344 articles were excluded following abstract and title appraisal. As a result, 16 articles were subjected to full text appraisal. The dates of publication ranged from 1973 to 2019. Although a unique modality, there is not enough evidence to support the employment of SCS over current medical standard of care. Further high-quality randomized control trials are required to elucidate SCS's role in MS induced spasticity algorithm.