Amany F Omara, Hadal Hassan Mohsen, Alaa Mohammed Abo Hagar, Ahmed F Abdelrahman
{"title":"鞘内吗啡与吗啡-右美托咪定联合用于全膝关节置换术后疼痛控制:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Amany F Omara, Hadal Hassan Mohsen, Alaa Mohammed Abo Hagar, Ahmed F Abdelrahman","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S419465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This prospective study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal morphine, dexmedetomidine, and a combination of both in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This randomized prospective study was carried out in Tanta university hospital in orthopedic surgery for 6 months on 105 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class II and III, aged > 50 years, and scheduled for total knee replacement surgery randomly allocated into morphine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine, morphine/ dexmedetomidine group, received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine and 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine. The time of the first required analgesia, postoperative pain severity, the total dose of morphine, postoperative complication, and the patient's level of sedation were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About half of the patients in the dexmedetomidine group requested first rescue analgesia 6 hours after the operation, significantly shorter than the other two groups. On the other hand, the other two groups show no significant difference between them regarding the first required analgesia. At rest, the dexmedetomidine group have significantly higher VAS with a significant increase in patients who required morphine as rescue analgesia than the other two groups. While at movement, patients in the dexmedetomidine group felt pain at 4 hrs postoperatively with significantly higher VAS than the other two groups. At the same time, the sedation score was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the other two groups. 22.2% of cases in the morphine group developed nausea and vomiting with a significant difference between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the absence of substantial side effects, our findings did not suggest enhanced analgesia with the combination of intrathecal morphine and dexmedetomidine.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":"16 ","pages":"113-122"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/f7/lra-16-113.PMC10404426.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intrathecal Morphine versus Morphine-Dexmedetomidine Combination for Postoperative Pain Control After Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Amany F Omara, Hadal Hassan Mohsen, Alaa Mohammed Abo Hagar, Ahmed F Abdelrahman\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/LRA.S419465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This prospective study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal morphine, dexmedetomidine, and a combination of both in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This randomized prospective study was carried out in Tanta university hospital in orthopedic surgery for 6 months on 105 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class II and III, aged > 50 years, and scheduled for total knee replacement surgery randomly allocated into morphine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine, morphine/ dexmedetomidine group, received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine and 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine. The time of the first required analgesia, postoperative pain severity, the total dose of morphine, postoperative complication, and the patient's level of sedation were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About half of the patients in the dexmedetomidine group requested first rescue analgesia 6 hours after the operation, significantly shorter than the other two groups. On the other hand, the other two groups show no significant difference between them regarding the first required analgesia. At rest, the dexmedetomidine group have significantly higher VAS with a significant increase in patients who required morphine as rescue analgesia than the other two groups. While at movement, patients in the dexmedetomidine group felt pain at 4 hrs postoperatively with significantly higher VAS than the other two groups. At the same time, the sedation score was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the other two groups. 22.2% of cases in the morphine group developed nausea and vomiting with a significant difference between the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the absence of substantial side effects, our findings did not suggest enhanced analgesia with the combination of intrathecal morphine and dexmedetomidine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Local and Regional Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"113-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/f7/lra-16-113.PMC10404426.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Local and Regional Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S419465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S419465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intrathecal Morphine versus Morphine-Dexmedetomidine Combination for Postoperative Pain Control After Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Objective: This prospective study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal morphine, dexmedetomidine, and a combination of both in patients undergoing total knee replacement (TKR).
Patients and methods: This randomized prospective study was carried out in Tanta university hospital in orthopedic surgery for 6 months on 105 adult patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class II and III, aged > 50 years, and scheduled for total knee replacement surgery randomly allocated into morphine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine, morphine/ dexmedetomidine group, received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine and 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine group received 0.5% heavy bupivacaine plus 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine. The time of the first required analgesia, postoperative pain severity, the total dose of morphine, postoperative complication, and the patient's level of sedation were recorded.
Results: About half of the patients in the dexmedetomidine group requested first rescue analgesia 6 hours after the operation, significantly shorter than the other two groups. On the other hand, the other two groups show no significant difference between them regarding the first required analgesia. At rest, the dexmedetomidine group have significantly higher VAS with a significant increase in patients who required morphine as rescue analgesia than the other two groups. While at movement, patients in the dexmedetomidine group felt pain at 4 hrs postoperatively with significantly higher VAS than the other two groups. At the same time, the sedation score was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the other two groups. 22.2% of cases in the morphine group developed nausea and vomiting with a significant difference between the three groups.
Conclusion: Despite the absence of substantial side effects, our findings did not suggest enhanced analgesia with the combination of intrathecal morphine and dexmedetomidine.