南印度人群抗高血压药物的处方模式和药物经济学分析:一项横断面研究。

Q2 Medicine Perspectives in Clinical Research Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-14 DOI:10.4103/picr.picr_122_22
S Shanmugapriya, Saravanan Thangavelu, Aashiq Ahamed Shukkoor, P Janani, R Monisha, Varsha Elsa Scaria
{"title":"南印度人群抗高血压药物的处方模式和药物经济学分析:一项横断面研究。","authors":"S Shanmugapriya,&nbsp;Saravanan Thangavelu,&nbsp;Aashiq Ahamed Shukkoor,&nbsp;P Janani,&nbsp;R Monisha,&nbsp;Varsha Elsa Scaria","doi":"10.4103/picr.picr_122_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Global evidence-based recommendations for hypertension management are periodically updated, and ensuring adherence to the guidelines is imperative. Furthermore, the current high prevalence of hypertension effectuates a high health-care cost.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the prescribing patterns of antihypertensive drugs and other factors affecting blood pressure (BP) with the objective of assessing the proportion of patients achieving the target BP and to perform a pharmacoeconomic analysis in a South Indian population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study, 650 patients previously diagnosed with hypertension and already on treatment with one or more drugs were included. A prospective interview of patients was done using a prevalidated questionnaire on various factors in BP control. Prescribing patterns and pharmacoeconomic analyses, namely, cost acquisition, cost of illness, and cost-effectiveness analyses were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 650 subjects, 257 (39.54%) achieved the target BP, while 393 (60.46%) did not. A significant association of age, occupational status, monthly family income, and area of residence in addition to physical activity and diet scores, with achieving target BP was noted. A significantly higher cost of anti-hypertensive drug treatment in achieving target BP (<i>P</i> = 0.02) was observed. Among patients who achieved target BP, 37.35% were on monotherapy and 48.25% on multiple drug therapy compared to 46.31% and 35.62%, respectively, in patients who did not. Average cost-effectiveness ratio were found to be Rs. 20.45 and Rs. 57.27, respectively, for single and multiple drug therapies, with incremental cost-effectiveness of Rs. 194.14 per additional patient treated with multiple free drug combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified the anti-hypertensive prescribing pattern and provided insight into the various pharmacoeconomic factors that play a significant role in attaining target BP in the treated population.</p>","PeriodicalId":20015,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","volume":"14 3","pages":"114-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f2/c8/PCR-14-114.PMC10405530.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prescribing patterns and pharmacoeconomic analysis of antihypertensive drugs in South Indian population: A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"S Shanmugapriya,&nbsp;Saravanan Thangavelu,&nbsp;Aashiq Ahamed Shukkoor,&nbsp;P Janani,&nbsp;R Monisha,&nbsp;Varsha Elsa Scaria\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/picr.picr_122_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Global evidence-based recommendations for hypertension management are periodically updated, and ensuring adherence to the guidelines is imperative. Furthermore, the current high prevalence of hypertension effectuates a high health-care cost.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the prescribing patterns of antihypertensive drugs and other factors affecting blood pressure (BP) with the objective of assessing the proportion of patients achieving the target BP and to perform a pharmacoeconomic analysis in a South Indian population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a cross-sectional study, 650 patients previously diagnosed with hypertension and already on treatment with one or more drugs were included. A prospective interview of patients was done using a prevalidated questionnaire on various factors in BP control. Prescribing patterns and pharmacoeconomic analyses, namely, cost acquisition, cost of illness, and cost-effectiveness analyses were carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 650 subjects, 257 (39.54%) achieved the target BP, while 393 (60.46%) did not. A significant association of age, occupational status, monthly family income, and area of residence in addition to physical activity and diet scores, with achieving target BP was noted. A significantly higher cost of anti-hypertensive drug treatment in achieving target BP (<i>P</i> = 0.02) was observed. Among patients who achieved target BP, 37.35% were on monotherapy and 48.25% on multiple drug therapy compared to 46.31% and 35.62%, respectively, in patients who did not. Average cost-effectiveness ratio were found to be Rs. 20.45 and Rs. 57.27, respectively, for single and multiple drug therapies, with incremental cost-effectiveness of Rs. 194.14 per additional patient treated with multiple free drug combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified the anti-hypertensive prescribing pattern and provided insight into the various pharmacoeconomic factors that play a significant role in attaining target BP in the treated population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Clinical Research\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"114-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f2/c8/PCR-14-114.PMC10405530.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_122_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.picr_122_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全球高血压管理循证建议定期更新,确保遵守指南至关重要。此外,目前高血压的高患病率带来了高昂的医疗费用。目的:评估降压药的处方模式和其他影响血压的因素,目的是评估达到目标血压的患者比例,并对南印度人群进行药物经济学分析。材料和方法:在一项横断面研究中,纳入了650名先前被诊断为高血压并已接受一种或多种药物治疗的患者。对患者进行了前瞻性访谈,使用了一份关于血压控制中各种因素的预验证问卷。进行了处方模式和药物经济学分析,即成本获取、疾病成本和成本效益分析。结果:650名受试者中,257人(39.54%)达到了目标血压,393人(60.46%)没有达到目标血压。除体育活动和饮食得分外,年龄、职业状况、每月家庭收入和居住面积与实现目标血压之间也存在显著关联。观察到在达到目标血压方面,抗高血压药物治疗的成本显著较高(P=0.02)。在达到目标血压的患者中,37.35%的患者接受单药治疗,48.25%的患者接受多种药物治疗,而未达到目标血压患者的这一比例分别为46.31%和35.62%。单药和多种药物治疗的平均成本效益比分别为20.45卢比和57.27卢比,每增加一名接受多种免费药物组合治疗的患者,成本效益增量为194.14卢比。结论:本研究确定了抗高血压的处方模式,并深入了解了在治疗人群中对达到目标血压起重要作用的各种药物经济因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prescribing patterns and pharmacoeconomic analysis of antihypertensive drugs in South Indian population: A cross-sectional study.

Background: Global evidence-based recommendations for hypertension management are periodically updated, and ensuring adherence to the guidelines is imperative. Furthermore, the current high prevalence of hypertension effectuates a high health-care cost.

Purpose: To evaluate the prescribing patterns of antihypertensive drugs and other factors affecting blood pressure (BP) with the objective of assessing the proportion of patients achieving the target BP and to perform a pharmacoeconomic analysis in a South Indian population.

Materials and methods: In a cross-sectional study, 650 patients previously diagnosed with hypertension and already on treatment with one or more drugs were included. A prospective interview of patients was done using a prevalidated questionnaire on various factors in BP control. Prescribing patterns and pharmacoeconomic analyses, namely, cost acquisition, cost of illness, and cost-effectiveness analyses were carried out.

Results: Of 650 subjects, 257 (39.54%) achieved the target BP, while 393 (60.46%) did not. A significant association of age, occupational status, monthly family income, and area of residence in addition to physical activity and diet scores, with achieving target BP was noted. A significantly higher cost of anti-hypertensive drug treatment in achieving target BP (P = 0.02) was observed. Among patients who achieved target BP, 37.35% were on monotherapy and 48.25% on multiple drug therapy compared to 46.31% and 35.62%, respectively, in patients who did not. Average cost-effectiveness ratio were found to be Rs. 20.45 and Rs. 57.27, respectively, for single and multiple drug therapies, with incremental cost-effectiveness of Rs. 194.14 per additional patient treated with multiple free drug combinations.

Conclusion: This study identified the anti-hypertensive prescribing pattern and provided insight into the various pharmacoeconomic factors that play a significant role in attaining target BP in the treated population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Clinical Research
Perspectives in Clinical Research Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer review quarterly journal is positioned to build a learning clinical research community in India. This scientific journal will have a broad coverage of topics across clinical research disciplines including clinical research methodology, research ethics, clinical data management, training, data management, biostatistics, regulatory and will include original articles, reviews, news and views, perspectives, and other interesting sections. PICR will offer all clinical research stakeholders in India – academicians, ethics committees, regulators, and industry professionals -a forum for exchange of ideas, information and opinions.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of student-led “Association for Support and Propagation of Innovation, Research, and Education” (A.S.P.I.R.E) in empowering undergraduate medical students in research: A 2-year longitudinal study Pleiotropic effect of teneligliptin versus glimepiride add-on therapy on hs-CRP and cardiorenal parameters in Indian type 2 diabetes patients: An open-labeled randomized controlled trial Efficacy and safety of quick penetrating solution heparin, quick penetrating solution diclofenac, and heparin gel in the prevention of infusion-associated superficial thrombophlebitis: A randomized controlled trial Bio-entrepreneurs’ bugbear: Regulatory rigmarole Experience of participating in community-based clinical trials from rural Maharashtra: Analysis of over 4000 participant feedback forms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1