肠道细菌和结直肠癌的性别差异。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY Journal of medical microbiology Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1099/jmm.0.001706
Xi Yang, Ping Li, Zhanbo Qu, Jing Zhuang, Yinhang Wu, Wei Wu, Qichun Wei
{"title":"肠道细菌和结直肠癌的性别差异。","authors":"Xi Yang,&nbsp;Ping Li,&nbsp;Zhanbo Qu,&nbsp;Jing Zhuang,&nbsp;Yinhang Wu,&nbsp;Wei Wu,&nbsp;Qichun Wei","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Differences in gut bacteria that are associated with the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer (CRC) exist between sexes, and males have a higher morbidity of CRC.<b>Gap Statement.</b> Clinical data for the relationship between gut bacteria and sexes in patients with CRC are not available and are needed to support individualized screening and treatment programmes.<b>Aim.</b> To analyse the relationship between gut bacteria and sexes in patients with CRC.<b>Methodology.</b> A total of 6 077 samples recruited by Fudan University's Academy of Brain Artificial Intelligence Science and Technology were included, and the gut bacteria composition mainly shows the top 30 genera. Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) was used to analyse the differences in gut bacteria. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to demonstrate the relationship of discrepant bacteria. CRC risk prediction models were used to rank the importance of valid discrepant bacteria.<b>Results.</b> <i>Bacteroides, Eubacterium</i> and <i>Faecalibacterium</i> were the top three bacteria in males with CRC, while <i>Bacteroides, Subdoligranulum</i> and <i>Eubacterium</i> were the top three bacteria in females with CRC. The abundance of gut bacteria (<i>Escherichia</i>, <i>Eubacteriales</i>, <i>Clostridia,</i> etc.) was higher in males with CRC compared with that in females with CRC. In addition, <i>Dorea</i> and <i>Bacteroides</i> were important CRC-related bacteria (<i>P</i><0.001). Finally, the importance of discrepant bacteria was ranked based on CRC risk prediction models. <i>Blautia, Barnesiella</i> and <i>Anaerostipes</i> were the top three important discrepant bacteria between males with CRC and females with CRC. The value of AUC was 1.0, the sensitivity was 92.0 %, the specificity was 68.4 %, and the accuracy was 83.3 % in the discovery set.<b>Conclusion.</b> Gut bacteria were correlated with sexes and CRC. It is necessary to consider gender when gut bacteria are used to treat and predict CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16343,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gut bacteria and sex differences in colorectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Xi Yang,&nbsp;Ping Li,&nbsp;Zhanbo Qu,&nbsp;Jing Zhuang,&nbsp;Yinhang Wu,&nbsp;Wei Wu,&nbsp;Qichun Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/jmm.0.001706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Differences in gut bacteria that are associated with the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer (CRC) exist between sexes, and males have a higher morbidity of CRC.<b>Gap Statement.</b> Clinical data for the relationship between gut bacteria and sexes in patients with CRC are not available and are needed to support individualized screening and treatment programmes.<b>Aim.</b> To analyse the relationship between gut bacteria and sexes in patients with CRC.<b>Methodology.</b> A total of 6 077 samples recruited by Fudan University's Academy of Brain Artificial Intelligence Science and Technology were included, and the gut bacteria composition mainly shows the top 30 genera. Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) was used to analyse the differences in gut bacteria. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to demonstrate the relationship of discrepant bacteria. CRC risk prediction models were used to rank the importance of valid discrepant bacteria.<b>Results.</b> <i>Bacteroides, Eubacterium</i> and <i>Faecalibacterium</i> were the top three bacteria in males with CRC, while <i>Bacteroides, Subdoligranulum</i> and <i>Eubacterium</i> were the top three bacteria in females with CRC. The abundance of gut bacteria (<i>Escherichia</i>, <i>Eubacteriales</i>, <i>Clostridia,</i> etc.) was higher in males with CRC compared with that in females with CRC. In addition, <i>Dorea</i> and <i>Bacteroides</i> were important CRC-related bacteria (<i>P</i><0.001). Finally, the importance of discrepant bacteria was ranked based on CRC risk prediction models. <i>Blautia, Barnesiella</i> and <i>Anaerostipes</i> were the top three important discrepant bacteria between males with CRC and females with CRC. The value of AUC was 1.0, the sensitivity was 92.0 %, the specificity was 68.4 %, and the accuracy was 83.3 % in the discovery set.<b>Conclusion.</b> Gut bacteria were correlated with sexes and CRC. It is necessary to consider gender when gut bacteria are used to treat and predict CRC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001706\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001706","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。与结直肠癌(CRC)发生发展相关的肠道细菌存在性别差异,男性结直肠癌发病率更高。差距的声明。目前还没有关于结直肠癌患者肠道细菌和性别之间关系的临床数据,需要这些数据来支持个体化筛查和治疗方案。目的:分析crc患者肠道菌群与性别的关系。共纳入复旦大学脑人工智能科学与技术研究院招募的6077份样本,肠道细菌组成主要显示前30个属。采用线性判别分析效应量(Effect Size, LEfSe)分析肠道细菌的差异。计算Pearson相关系数来证明差异菌之间的关系。使用结直肠癌风险预测模型对有效差异菌的重要性进行排序。男性结直肠癌患者中检出最多的细菌是拟杆菌、真杆菌和粪杆菌,女性结直肠癌患者中检出最多的细菌是拟杆菌、亚多囊带和真杆菌。男性结直肠癌患者肠道细菌(埃希氏菌、真细菌、梭菌等)的丰度高于女性结直肠癌患者。此外,Dorea和Bacteroides是CRC相关的重要细菌(PBlautia、Barnesiella和Anaerostipes是男性CRC与女性CRC差异最大的前3位细菌)。AUC值为1.0,灵敏度为92.0%,特异度为68.4%,准确度为83.3%。肠道细菌与性别和结直肠癌相关。当使用肠道细菌来治疗和预测结直肠癌时,有必要考虑性别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gut bacteria and sex differences in colorectal cancer.

Introduction. Differences in gut bacteria that are associated with the occurrence and development of colorectal cancer (CRC) exist between sexes, and males have a higher morbidity of CRC.Gap Statement. Clinical data for the relationship between gut bacteria and sexes in patients with CRC are not available and are needed to support individualized screening and treatment programmes.Aim. To analyse the relationship between gut bacteria and sexes in patients with CRC.Methodology. A total of 6 077 samples recruited by Fudan University's Academy of Brain Artificial Intelligence Science and Technology were included, and the gut bacteria composition mainly shows the top 30 genera. Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) was used to analyse the differences in gut bacteria. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to demonstrate the relationship of discrepant bacteria. CRC risk prediction models were used to rank the importance of valid discrepant bacteria.Results. Bacteroides, Eubacterium and Faecalibacterium were the top three bacteria in males with CRC, while Bacteroides, Subdoligranulum and Eubacterium were the top three bacteria in females with CRC. The abundance of gut bacteria (Escherichia, Eubacteriales, Clostridia, etc.) was higher in males with CRC compared with that in females with CRC. In addition, Dorea and Bacteroides were important CRC-related bacteria (P<0.001). Finally, the importance of discrepant bacteria was ranked based on CRC risk prediction models. Blautia, Barnesiella and Anaerostipes were the top three important discrepant bacteria between males with CRC and females with CRC. The value of AUC was 1.0, the sensitivity was 92.0 %, the specificity was 68.4 %, and the accuracy was 83.3 % in the discovery set.Conclusion. Gut bacteria were correlated with sexes and CRC. It is necessary to consider gender when gut bacteria are used to treat and predict CRC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of medical microbiology
Journal of medical microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Microbiology provides comprehensive coverage of medical, dental and veterinary microbiology, and infectious diseases. We welcome everything from laboratory research to clinical trials, including bacteriology, virology, mycology and parasitology. We publish articles under the following subject categories: Antimicrobial resistance; Clinical microbiology; Disease, diagnosis and diagnostics; Medical mycology; Molecular and microbial epidemiology; Microbiome and microbial ecology in health; One Health; Pathogenesis, virulence and host response; Prevention, therapy and therapeutics
期刊最新文献
Polymyxin combined with Ocimum gratissimum essential oil: one alternative strategy for combating polymyxin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae The impact of agar depth on antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disc diffusion Antimicrobial spectrum against wound pathogens and cytotoxicity of star-arranged poly-l-lysine-based antimicrobial peptide polymers Gut microbiota plays a significant role in gout Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 147: a high-risk clone increasingly associated with plasmids carrying both resistance and virulence elements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1