评估群体心理干预对接受生育治疗的不孕症妇女心理健康的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Health Psychology Review Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1080/17437199.2022.2058582
Emma Warne, Melissa Oxlad, Talitha Best
{"title":"评估群体心理干预对接受生育治疗的不孕症妇女心理健康的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Emma Warne, Melissa Oxlad, Talitha Best","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2022.2058582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature concerning the effectiveness of group psychological interventions in improving anxiety, depression, marital dissatisfaction, fertility quality of life and stress, and pregnancy outcomes of women with infertility, participating in fertility treatment. A search of five databases yielded 1603 studies; 30 articles met inclusion criteria, and computations of effect sizes ensued (Hedges’ g and Odds Ratios (OR)). The total sample comprised 2752 participants, with 1279 participants receiving group intervention and 1473 participants in the comparison group. Group psychological interventions reduced depression (Hgw =  −1.277; 95% CI = [−1.739- −0.815]; p =  0.000), anxiety (Hgw = −1.136, 95% CI [−1.527- −0.744]; p =  0.000), fertility stress (Hgw = −0.250, 95% CI [−0.388- −0.122]; p =  0.000), and marital dissatisfaction (Hgw = −0.938; 95% [CI −1.455- −0.421]; p =  0.000), and pregnancy rates improved (OR = 2.422 95% CI [2.037–2.879]; p = 0.000). No improvement was observed regarding fertility quality of life (Hgw = 0. 144; 95% CI [−0.176- 0.463]; p =  0.379). Our findings highlight that participation in group psychological intervention improved the mental health, fertility stress and pregnancy rates of women with infertility.","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"17 3","pages":"377-401"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating group psychological interventions for mental health in women with infertility undertaking fertility treatment: A systematic review and meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Warne, Melissa Oxlad, Talitha Best\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17437199.2022.2058582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature concerning the effectiveness of group psychological interventions in improving anxiety, depression, marital dissatisfaction, fertility quality of life and stress, and pregnancy outcomes of women with infertility, participating in fertility treatment. A search of five databases yielded 1603 studies; 30 articles met inclusion criteria, and computations of effect sizes ensued (Hedges’ g and Odds Ratios (OR)). The total sample comprised 2752 participants, with 1279 participants receiving group intervention and 1473 participants in the comparison group. Group psychological interventions reduced depression (Hgw =  −1.277; 95% CI = [−1.739- −0.815]; p =  0.000), anxiety (Hgw = −1.136, 95% CI [−1.527- −0.744]; p =  0.000), fertility stress (Hgw = −0.250, 95% CI [−0.388- −0.122]; p =  0.000), and marital dissatisfaction (Hgw = −0.938; 95% [CI −1.455- −0.421]; p =  0.000), and pregnancy rates improved (OR = 2.422 95% CI [2.037–2.879]; p = 0.000). No improvement was observed regarding fertility quality of life (Hgw = 0. 144; 95% CI [−0.176- 0.463]; p =  0.379). Our findings highlight that participation in group psychological intervention improved the mental health, fertility stress and pregnancy rates of women with infertility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"377-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2058582\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2058582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要我们对已发表的关于群体心理干预在改善不孕不育妇女参加生育治疗的焦虑、抑郁、婚姻不满、生育生活质量和压力以及妊娠结局方面的有效性的文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。对5个数据库的搜索得到了1603项研究;30篇文章符合纳入标准,然后计算效应大小(对冲系数g和比值比(OR))。样本总数为2752人,其中实验组干预1279人,对照组干预1473人。群体心理干预减少抑郁(Hgw = -1.277;95% ci = [-1.739- -0.815];p = 0.000),焦虑(Hgw = -1.136, 95% CI (-1.527 - -0.744);p = 0.000),生育压力(Hgw = -0.250, 95% CI (-0.388 - -0.122);p = 0.000)、婚姻不满意度(Hgw = -0.938;95% [ci -1.455- -0.421];p = 0.000),妊娠率提高(OR = 2.422 95% CI [2.037 ~ 2.879];p = 0.000)。生育生活质量未见改善(Hgw = 0)。144;95% ci [-0.176- 0.463];P = 0.379)。我们的研究结果强调,参与群体心理干预改善了不孕妇女的心理健康、生育压力和怀孕率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating group psychological interventions for mental health in women with infertility undertaking fertility treatment: A systematic review and meta-Analysis.
ABSTRACT We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature concerning the effectiveness of group psychological interventions in improving anxiety, depression, marital dissatisfaction, fertility quality of life and stress, and pregnancy outcomes of women with infertility, participating in fertility treatment. A search of five databases yielded 1603 studies; 30 articles met inclusion criteria, and computations of effect sizes ensued (Hedges’ g and Odds Ratios (OR)). The total sample comprised 2752 participants, with 1279 participants receiving group intervention and 1473 participants in the comparison group. Group psychological interventions reduced depression (Hgw =  −1.277; 95% CI = [−1.739- −0.815]; p =  0.000), anxiety (Hgw = −1.136, 95% CI [−1.527- −0.744]; p =  0.000), fertility stress (Hgw = −0.250, 95% CI [−0.388- −0.122]; p =  0.000), and marital dissatisfaction (Hgw = −0.938; 95% [CI −1.455- −0.421]; p =  0.000), and pregnancy rates improved (OR = 2.422 95% CI [2.037–2.879]; p = 0.000). No improvement was observed regarding fertility quality of life (Hgw = 0. 144; 95% CI [−0.176- 0.463]; p =  0.379). Our findings highlight that participation in group psychological intervention improved the mental health, fertility stress and pregnancy rates of women with infertility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
期刊最新文献
The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder symptomatology and diagnosis in burn survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Yoga as an intervention for stress: a meta-analysis. Analytical decisions pose moral questions. Components of multiple health behaviour change interventions for patients with chronic conditions: a systematic review and meta-regression of randomized trials. Identifying the psychosocial barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of genetic services for hereditary cancer syndromes: a systematic review of qualitative studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1