炎症性肠病患者加速输注英夫利昔单抗的安全性和耐受性不低于标准输注方案:一项随机对照研究

IF 1.8 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Crohn's & Colitis 360 Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1093/crocol/otad022
Suha Abushamma, Ted Walker, Kevin Garza, Ling Chen, Darren Nix, Chien-Huan Chen
{"title":"炎症性肠病患者加速输注英夫利昔单抗的安全性和耐受性不低于标准输注方案:一项随机对照研究","authors":"Suha Abushamma,&nbsp;Ted Walker,&nbsp;Kevin Garza,&nbsp;Ling Chen,&nbsp;Darren Nix,&nbsp;Chien-Huan Chen","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otad022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Infliximab is typically given over an infusion time of 2 hours, leading to a significant burden in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. We aimed to determine the safety and cost-effectiveness of an accelerated infliximab infusion of 1 hour, compared with the standard 2-hour infusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Open-label randomized trial where IBD patients receiving maintenance infliximab infusions were randomly assigned to 1- and 2-hour infusion groups, corresponding to study and control groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the rate of infusion reactions. Secondary outcomes were assessment of the effect of premedications and immunomodulators on the rate of infusion reactions, and cost-effectiveness analysis. The cost-effectiveness analysis was based on direct nursing costs for the infusion time, indirect infusion center costs, and cost of productivity loss for patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05340764.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2020 to November 2021, 96 patients were randomly assigned: 51 (53%) to the 1-hour infusion group and 45 (47%) to the 2-hour infusion group. Over a median time of 1 year, 309 infusions were administered in the control group, and 376 in the study group. Fifty-seven (18%) infusions in the control group and 45 (12%) infusions in the study group experienced an infusion reaction. The only infusion reaction was asymptomatic hypotension not requiring infusion discontinuation. No other infusion reactions (mild or moderate/severe) were seen. Diphenhydramine was associated with an increased rate of infusion reactions (OR 2.04 [95% CI 1.18-3.52], <i>P</i> = .01). The average costs were estimated to reduce by 37% in the accelerated infusion group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accelerated 1-hour infusions are non-inferior in safety and superior in cost-effectiveness compared with standard 2-hour infusions in IBD patients receiving maintenance infliximab infusions.</p><p><strong>Trial identification number: </strong>Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05340764.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accelerated Infliximab Infusion Safety and Tolerability Is Non-inferior to Standard Infusion Protocol in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.\",\"authors\":\"Suha Abushamma,&nbsp;Ted Walker,&nbsp;Kevin Garza,&nbsp;Ling Chen,&nbsp;Darren Nix,&nbsp;Chien-Huan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/crocol/otad022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Infliximab is typically given over an infusion time of 2 hours, leading to a significant burden in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. We aimed to determine the safety and cost-effectiveness of an accelerated infliximab infusion of 1 hour, compared with the standard 2-hour infusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Open-label randomized trial where IBD patients receiving maintenance infliximab infusions were randomly assigned to 1- and 2-hour infusion groups, corresponding to study and control groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the rate of infusion reactions. Secondary outcomes were assessment of the effect of premedications and immunomodulators on the rate of infusion reactions, and cost-effectiveness analysis. The cost-effectiveness analysis was based on direct nursing costs for the infusion time, indirect infusion center costs, and cost of productivity loss for patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05340764.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From November 2020 to November 2021, 96 patients were randomly assigned: 51 (53%) to the 1-hour infusion group and 45 (47%) to the 2-hour infusion group. Over a median time of 1 year, 309 infusions were administered in the control group, and 376 in the study group. Fifty-seven (18%) infusions in the control group and 45 (12%) infusions in the study group experienced an infusion reaction. The only infusion reaction was asymptomatic hypotension not requiring infusion discontinuation. No other infusion reactions (mild or moderate/severe) were seen. Diphenhydramine was associated with an increased rate of infusion reactions (OR 2.04 [95% CI 1.18-3.52], <i>P</i> = .01). The average costs were estimated to reduce by 37% in the accelerated infusion group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accelerated 1-hour infusions are non-inferior in safety and superior in cost-effectiveness compared with standard 2-hour infusions in IBD patients receiving maintenance infliximab infusions.</p><p><strong>Trial identification number: </strong>Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05340764.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243871/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crohn's & Colitis 360\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otad022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otad022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:英夫利昔单抗通常在2小时输注时间内给予,导致炎症性肠病(IBD)患者的显著负担。我们的目的是确定英夫利昔单抗加速输注1小时与标准输注2小时相比的安全性和成本效益。方法:开放标签随机试验,接受维护性英夫利昔单抗输注的IBD患者随机分为1小时输注组和2小时输注组,分别对应于研究组和对照组。主要观察指标是输液反应的速率。次要结局是评估预用药和免疫调节剂对输液反应率的影响,并进行成本-效果分析。成本-效果分析基于输液时间的直接护理成本、间接输液中心成本和患者生产力损失成本。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT05340764。结果:2020年11月至2021年11月,96例患者随机分配:1小时输注组51例(53%),2小时输注组45例(47%)。在平均1年的时间内,对照组输注309次,研究组输注376次。对照组57例(18%)和研究组45例(12%)发生输液反应。唯一的输液反应是无症状性低血压,不需要停药。未见其他输液反应(轻度或中度/重度)。苯海拉明与输液反应发生率增加相关(OR 2.04 [95% CI 1.18-3.52], P = 0.01)。据估计,加速输注组的平均费用降低了37%。结论:与接受维持性英夫利昔单抗输注的IBD患者相比,加速1小时输注在安全性上不差,在成本效益上优于标准2小时输注。试验识别号:注册于ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05340764。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accelerated Infliximab Infusion Safety and Tolerability Is Non-inferior to Standard Infusion Protocol in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Background and aim: Infliximab is typically given over an infusion time of 2 hours, leading to a significant burden in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. We aimed to determine the safety and cost-effectiveness of an accelerated infliximab infusion of 1 hour, compared with the standard 2-hour infusion.

Methods: Open-label randomized trial where IBD patients receiving maintenance infliximab infusions were randomly assigned to 1- and 2-hour infusion groups, corresponding to study and control groups, respectively. The primary outcome was the rate of infusion reactions. Secondary outcomes were assessment of the effect of premedications and immunomodulators on the rate of infusion reactions, and cost-effectiveness analysis. The cost-effectiveness analysis was based on direct nursing costs for the infusion time, indirect infusion center costs, and cost of productivity loss for patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05340764.

Results: From November 2020 to November 2021, 96 patients were randomly assigned: 51 (53%) to the 1-hour infusion group and 45 (47%) to the 2-hour infusion group. Over a median time of 1 year, 309 infusions were administered in the control group, and 376 in the study group. Fifty-seven (18%) infusions in the control group and 45 (12%) infusions in the study group experienced an infusion reaction. The only infusion reaction was asymptomatic hypotension not requiring infusion discontinuation. No other infusion reactions (mild or moderate/severe) were seen. Diphenhydramine was associated with an increased rate of infusion reactions (OR 2.04 [95% CI 1.18-3.52], P = .01). The average costs were estimated to reduce by 37% in the accelerated infusion group.

Conclusions: Accelerated 1-hour infusions are non-inferior in safety and superior in cost-effectiveness compared with standard 2-hour infusions in IBD patients receiving maintenance infliximab infusions.

Trial identification number: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05340764.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Crohn's & Colitis 360
Crohn's & Colitis 360 Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Real-World Treatment Outcomes Associated With Early Versus Delayed Vedolizumab Initiation in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis. Like a Punch in the Gut: A Novel Perspective On Annual Recurrences of Ulcerative Colitis. Interventions for Adjunctive Care in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Permanent Ileostomy: A Systematic Review. Clinical Approach to STRIDE-II in Real-Life Settings: Analysis and Practical Recommendations. Evaluation of the Symptoms and Clinical Characteristics of Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis That Affect Healthcare Providers' Treatment Choices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1