Benjamin M Wilkowski, Emilio Rivera, Laverl Z Williamson, Erika DiMariano, Brian P Meier, Adam Fetterman
{"title":"建立以数据为导向的美国政治目标综合模型:认识自由主义和保守主义的 \"价值观 \"和 \"恶习\"。","authors":"Benjamin M Wilkowski, Emilio Rivera, Laverl Z Williamson, Erika DiMariano, Brian P Meier, Adam Fetterman","doi":"10.1177/01461672231185484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When a person indicates they are \"liberal\" or \"conservative,\" an important part of what they are communicating is their <i>goals</i> for how they would like society to be structured. However, past theories have described these goals in dramatically different fashions, suggesting that either conservativism or liberalism reflects a divisive or unifying goal. To help overcome this impasse, we systematically compared a broad, representative sample of all possible higher-order goals (drawn a previous lexical investigation of more than 1,000 goals) to the political ideology of American adults (total <i>n</i> = 1,588). The results of five studies suggested that proposals from competing theories are all partially correct. Conservativism simultaneously reflects the unifying \"value\" of Tradition, as well as the divisive \"vice\" of Elitism; while Liberalism simultaneously reflects the unifying \"value\" of Inclusiveness, and the divisive \"vice\" of Rebellion. These results help to integrate proposals from previous competing theories into a single framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":19834,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":"167-184"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a Comprehensive, Data-Driven Model of American Political Goals: Recognizing the \\\"Values\\\" and \\\"Vices\\\" Within Both Liberalism and Conservativism.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin M Wilkowski, Emilio Rivera, Laverl Z Williamson, Erika DiMariano, Brian P Meier, Adam Fetterman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01461672231185484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When a person indicates they are \\\"liberal\\\" or \\\"conservative,\\\" an important part of what they are communicating is their <i>goals</i> for how they would like society to be structured. However, past theories have described these goals in dramatically different fashions, suggesting that either conservativism or liberalism reflects a divisive or unifying goal. To help overcome this impasse, we systematically compared a broad, representative sample of all possible higher-order goals (drawn a previous lexical investigation of more than 1,000 goals) to the political ideology of American adults (total <i>n</i> = 1,588). The results of five studies suggested that proposals from competing theories are all partially correct. Conservativism simultaneously reflects the unifying \\\"value\\\" of Tradition, as well as the divisive \\\"vice\\\" of Elitism; while Liberalism simultaneously reflects the unifying \\\"value\\\" of Inclusiveness, and the divisive \\\"vice\\\" of Rebellion. These results help to integrate proposals from previous competing theories into a single framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"167-184\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231185484\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231185484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Toward a Comprehensive, Data-Driven Model of American Political Goals: Recognizing the "Values" and "Vices" Within Both Liberalism and Conservativism.
When a person indicates they are "liberal" or "conservative," an important part of what they are communicating is their goals for how they would like society to be structured. However, past theories have described these goals in dramatically different fashions, suggesting that either conservativism or liberalism reflects a divisive or unifying goal. To help overcome this impasse, we systematically compared a broad, representative sample of all possible higher-order goals (drawn a previous lexical investigation of more than 1,000 goals) to the political ideology of American adults (total n = 1,588). The results of five studies suggested that proposals from competing theories are all partially correct. Conservativism simultaneously reflects the unifying "value" of Tradition, as well as the divisive "vice" of Elitism; while Liberalism simultaneously reflects the unifying "value" of Inclusiveness, and the divisive "vice" of Rebellion. These results help to integrate proposals from previous competing theories into a single framework.
期刊介绍:
The Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin is the official journal for the Society of Personality and Social Psychology. The journal is an international outlet for original empirical papers in all areas of personality and social psychology.