Maëlle Lerebourg, Floris P de Lange, Marius V Peelen
{"title":"预期的分心背景会使目标形状的注意模板产生偏差。","authors":"Maëlle Lerebourg, Floris P de Lange, Marius V Peelen","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual search is supported by an internal representation of the target, the attentional template. However, which features are diagnostic of target presence critically depends on the distractors. Accordingly, previous research showed that consistent distractor context shapes the attentional template for simple targets, with the template emphasizing diagnostic dimensions (e.g., color or orientation) in blocks of trials. Here, we investigated how distractor expectations bias attentional templates for complex shapes, and tested whether such biases reflect intertrial priming or can be instantiated flexibly. Participants searched for novel shapes (cued by name) in two probabilistic distractor contexts: Either the target's orientation or rectilinearity was unique (80% validity). Across four experiments, performance was better when the distractor context was expected, indicating that target features in the expected diagnostic dimension were emphasized. Attentional templates were biased by distractor expectations when distractor context was blocked, also for participants reporting no awareness of the manipulation. Interestingly, attentional templates were also biased when distractor context was cued on a trial-by-trial basis, but only when the two contexts were consistently presented at distinct spatial locations. These results show that attentional templates can flexibly and adaptively incorporate expectations about target-distractor relations when looking for the same object in different contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expected distractor context biases the attentional template for target shapes.\",\"authors\":\"Maëlle Lerebourg, Floris P de Lange, Marius V Peelen\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/xhp0001129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Visual search is supported by an internal representation of the target, the attentional template. However, which features are diagnostic of target presence critically depends on the distractors. Accordingly, previous research showed that consistent distractor context shapes the attentional template for simple targets, with the template emphasizing diagnostic dimensions (e.g., color or orientation) in blocks of trials. Here, we investigated how distractor expectations bias attentional templates for complex shapes, and tested whether such biases reflect intertrial priming or can be instantiated flexibly. Participants searched for novel shapes (cued by name) in two probabilistic distractor contexts: Either the target's orientation or rectilinearity was unique (80% validity). Across four experiments, performance was better when the distractor context was expected, indicating that target features in the expected diagnostic dimension were emphasized. Attentional templates were biased by distractor expectations when distractor context was blocked, also for participants reporting no awareness of the manipulation. Interestingly, attentional templates were also biased when distractor context was cued on a trial-by-trial basis, but only when the two contexts were consistently presented at distinct spatial locations. These results show that attentional templates can flexibly and adaptively incorporate expectations about target-distractor relations when looking for the same object in different contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616464/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
视觉搜索由目标的内部表征--注意模板--支持。然而,哪些特征可以诊断目标是否存在,关键取决于分心物。因此,先前的研究表明,一致的分心者情境会塑造简单目标的注意模板,模板会在试验块中强调诊断维度(如颜色或方向)。在这里,我们研究了分心者的预期如何偏向复杂形状的注意模板,并测试了这种偏向是否反映了试验间引物或可以灵活地实例化。受试者在两种概率性分心情境中寻找新奇的形状(以名称提示):目标物的方向或直线度都是唯一的(有效率为 80%)。在四次实验中,当分心情境是预期的时,成绩会更好,这表明预期诊断维度中的目标特征得到了强调。当分心情境被阻断时,注意力模板会受到分心预期的影响,这一点在没有意识到操作的参与者中也是如此。有趣的是,当分心情境在逐次试验的基础上进行提示时,注意模板也会出现偏差,但只有当两种情境持续出现在不同的空间位置时,注意模板才会出现偏差。这些结果表明,当在不同情境中寻找同一目标时,注意模板可以灵活、自适应地纳入对目标-分心者关系的预期。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
Expected distractor context biases the attentional template for target shapes.
Visual search is supported by an internal representation of the target, the attentional template. However, which features are diagnostic of target presence critically depends on the distractors. Accordingly, previous research showed that consistent distractor context shapes the attentional template for simple targets, with the template emphasizing diagnostic dimensions (e.g., color or orientation) in blocks of trials. Here, we investigated how distractor expectations bias attentional templates for complex shapes, and tested whether such biases reflect intertrial priming or can be instantiated flexibly. Participants searched for novel shapes (cued by name) in two probabilistic distractor contexts: Either the target's orientation or rectilinearity was unique (80% validity). Across four experiments, performance was better when the distractor context was expected, indicating that target features in the expected diagnostic dimension were emphasized. Attentional templates were biased by distractor expectations when distractor context was blocked, also for participants reporting no awareness of the manipulation. Interestingly, attentional templates were also biased when distractor context was cued on a trial-by-trial basis, but only when the two contexts were consistently presented at distinct spatial locations. These results show that attentional templates can flexibly and adaptively incorporate expectations about target-distractor relations when looking for the same object in different contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).