经股骨截肢后骨整合假体患者的康复-基于文献的术后康复程序推荐。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1545-5486
Philipp Georg Schnadthorst, Andreas Lison, Christoph Schulze
{"title":"经股骨截肢后骨整合假体患者的康复-基于文献的术后康复程序推荐。","authors":"Philipp Georg Schnadthorst,&nbsp;Andreas Lison,&nbsp;Christoph Schulze","doi":"10.1055/a-1545-5486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osseointegrative implantation after amputation of the lower extremity is a special treatment option. Physiotherapeutic treatment is important for the functional outcome. This study systematically evaluated existing follow-up treatment protocols to establish a literature-based recommendation for postoperative rehabilitation procedures.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A PubMed literature search was conducted on December 10, 2020, using the following search terms: (osseo-integrat* OR endo-exo OR boneanchored OR bone anchored) AND (prosthe*) AND (leg OR lower limb* OR lower extremit* OR transfem* OR transtib*) AND (rehabilitation). 113 publications were found in this context. 10 of them met inclusion criteria. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to determine the publications' quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three systematic rehabilitation protocols have been described: Osseointegrated Prostheses for the Rehabilitation of Amputees protocol, Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated protocol and Radboud Amputation: rehabilitation protocol for endo-exo femoral prosthesis. There are clear differences in the duration of the rehabilitation protocols. The quality of published studies is limited due to the high risk of bias and low evidence levels (mainly III - V). A concept for long-term rehabilitation has not been described yet.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are various protocols for rehabilitation after treatment with osseointegrative prosthesis. Gradually increasing axial weight bearing started shortly after surgery; step-by-step gait training, adaptation of the prosthesis to the new biomechanics and critical patient selection and pre-operative training have been proven useful for successful rehabilitation. Controlled comparative studies, standardised outcome measurements or comparative studies between different protocols are not available. Models for multi-level long-term care have not been described in the literature so far.</p>","PeriodicalId":51219,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","volume":"161 3","pages":"318-327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rehabilitation of Patients with Osseointegrated Prosthesis after Transfemoral Amputation - Literature-based Recommendation for Postoperative Rehabilitative Procedure.\",\"authors\":\"Philipp Georg Schnadthorst,&nbsp;Andreas Lison,&nbsp;Christoph Schulze\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-1545-5486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osseointegrative implantation after amputation of the lower extremity is a special treatment option. Physiotherapeutic treatment is important for the functional outcome. This study systematically evaluated existing follow-up treatment protocols to establish a literature-based recommendation for postoperative rehabilitation procedures.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A PubMed literature search was conducted on December 10, 2020, using the following search terms: (osseo-integrat* OR endo-exo OR boneanchored OR bone anchored) AND (prosthe*) AND (leg OR lower limb* OR lower extremit* OR transfem* OR transtib*) AND (rehabilitation). 113 publications were found in this context. 10 of them met inclusion criteria. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to determine the publications' quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three systematic rehabilitation protocols have been described: Osseointegrated Prostheses for the Rehabilitation of Amputees protocol, Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated protocol and Radboud Amputation: rehabilitation protocol for endo-exo femoral prosthesis. There are clear differences in the duration of the rehabilitation protocols. The quality of published studies is limited due to the high risk of bias and low evidence levels (mainly III - V). A concept for long-term rehabilitation has not been described yet.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are various protocols for rehabilitation after treatment with osseointegrative prosthesis. Gradually increasing axial weight bearing started shortly after surgery; step-by-step gait training, adaptation of the prosthesis to the new biomechanics and critical patient selection and pre-operative training have been proven useful for successful rehabilitation. Controlled comparative studies, standardised outcome measurements or comparative studies between different protocols are not available. Models for multi-level long-term care have not been described in the literature so far.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie\",\"volume\":\"161 3\",\"pages\":\"318-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1545-5486\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und Unfallchirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1545-5486","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:下肢截肢后骨整合种植是一种特殊的治疗选择。物理治疗对功能预后很重要。本研究系统地评估了现有的随访治疗方案,以建立基于文献的术后康复程序推荐。方法:于2020年12月10日进行PubMed文献检索,检索词为:(osteo -integrat* OR endoo -exo OR bone - anchor OR bone - anchor) AND (prosthe*) AND (leg OR下肢* OR下肢* OR transfem* OR transstib *) AND (rehabilitation)。在这方面发现了113份出版物。其中10例符合纳入标准。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具来确定出版物的质量。结果:三种系统的康复方案被描述:骨整合假肢康复方案,澳大利亚骨整合小组加速方案和Radboud截肢:股骨内外假体康复方案。康复方案的持续时间有明显的不同。由于高偏倚风险和低证据水平(主要是III - V级),已发表研究的质量受到限制。长期康复的概念尚未被描述。结论:骨整合假体治疗后的康复方案多种多样。术后不久开始逐渐增加轴向负重;逐步的步态训练,假体适应新的生物力学,关键病人的选择和术前训练已被证明对成功的康复是有用的。没有对照比较研究、标准化结果测量或不同方案之间的比较研究。到目前为止,文献中还没有描述多层次长期护理的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rehabilitation of Patients with Osseointegrated Prosthesis after Transfemoral Amputation - Literature-based Recommendation for Postoperative Rehabilitative Procedure.

Background: Osseointegrative implantation after amputation of the lower extremity is a special treatment option. Physiotherapeutic treatment is important for the functional outcome. This study systematically evaluated existing follow-up treatment protocols to establish a literature-based recommendation for postoperative rehabilitation procedures.

Methodology: A PubMed literature search was conducted on December 10, 2020, using the following search terms: (osseo-integrat* OR endo-exo OR boneanchored OR bone anchored) AND (prosthe*) AND (leg OR lower limb* OR lower extremit* OR transfem* OR transtib*) AND (rehabilitation). 113 publications were found in this context. 10 of them met inclusion criteria. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to determine the publications' quality.

Results: Three systematic rehabilitation protocols have been described: Osseointegrated Prostheses for the Rehabilitation of Amputees protocol, Osseointegration Group of Australia Accelerated protocol and Radboud Amputation: rehabilitation protocol for endo-exo femoral prosthesis. There are clear differences in the duration of the rehabilitation protocols. The quality of published studies is limited due to the high risk of bias and low evidence levels (mainly III - V). A concept for long-term rehabilitation has not been described yet.

Conclusions: There are various protocols for rehabilitation after treatment with osseointegrative prosthesis. Gradually increasing axial weight bearing started shortly after surgery; step-by-step gait training, adaptation of the prosthesis to the new biomechanics and critical patient selection and pre-operative training have been proven useful for successful rehabilitation. Controlled comparative studies, standardised outcome measurements or comparative studies between different protocols are not available. Models for multi-level long-term care have not been described in the literature so far.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Das Forum für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aus einer Hand Aktuelles aus Klinik, Wissenschaft und Forschung Ein unabhängiges Peer-Review-Verfahren sichert Qualität, Relevanz und Plausibilität der Daten Modernes Layout: Klare Gliederung, farbige Abbildungen, strukturierte Tabellen Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie aktuell: Berichte und Reportagen zu den wichtigsten Themen im Fach
期刊最新文献
Long-term Outcomes after Medial Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy - A Retrospective Study of 69 Patients. S2k Guideline for Tibial Plateau Fractures - Classification, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Long-term Outcomes in Orthogeriatric Co-management: a Literature Review. Non-drainage Offers Faster Proprioceptive and Functional Recovery, and More Clinical Benefits for Patients following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Compared to Drainage. Fractures in Childhood and Young Adulthood According to Maternal Smoking in Late Pregnancy. A Danish Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1