新冠肺炎大流行对心理健康专业人员压力和职业健康的纵向影响:一项国际研究。

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1093/ijnp/pyad046
Cary S Kogan, José A Garcia-Pacheco, Tahilia J Rebello, Madeline I Montoya, Rebeca Robles, Brigitte Khoury, Maya Kulygina, Chihiro Matsumoto, Jingjing Huang, María Elena Medina-Mora, Oye Gureje, Dan J Stein, Pratap Sharan, Wolfgang Gaebel, Shigenobu Kanba, Howard F Andrews, Michael C Roberts, Kathleen M Pike, Min Zhao, José Luis Ayuso-Mateos, Karolina Sadowska, Karen Maré, Keith Denny, Geoffrey M Reed
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行对心理健康专业人员压力和职业健康的纵向影响:一项国际研究。","authors":"Cary S Kogan, José A Garcia-Pacheco, Tahilia J Rebello, Madeline I Montoya, Rebeca Robles, Brigitte Khoury, Maya Kulygina, Chihiro Matsumoto, Jingjing Huang, María Elena Medina-Mora, Oye Gureje, Dan J Stein, Pratap Sharan, Wolfgang Gaebel, Shigenobu Kanba, Howard F Andrews, Michael C Roberts, Kathleen M Pike, Min Zhao, José Luis Ayuso-Mateos, Karolina Sadowska, Karen Maré, Keith Denny, Geoffrey M Reed","doi":"10.1093/ijnp/pyad046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increased levels of occupational stress among health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic have been documented. Few studies have examined the effects of the pandemic on mental health professionals despite the heightened demand for their services.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A multilingual, longitudinal, global survey was conducted at 3 time points during the pandemic among members of the World Health Organization's Global Clinical Practice Network. A total of 786 Global Clinical Practice Network members from 86 countries responded to surveys assessing occupational distress, well-being, and posttraumatic stress symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, respondents' well-being deteriorated across time while their posttraumatic stress symptoms showed a modest improvement. Linear growth models indicated that being female, being younger, providing face-to-face health services to patients with COVID-19, having been a target of COVID-related violence, and living in a low- or middle-income country or a country with a higher COVID-19 death rate conveyed greater risk for poor well-being and higher level of stress symptoms over time. Growth mixed modeling identified trajectories of occupational well-being and stress symptoms. Most mental health professions demonstrated no impact to well-being; maintained moderate, nonclinical levels of stress symptoms; or showed improvements after an initial period of difficulty. However, some participant groups exhibited deteriorating well-being approaching the clinical threshold (25.8%) and persistently high and clinically significant levels of posttraumatic stress symptoms (19.6%) over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicates that although most mental health professionals exhibited stable, positive well-being and low stress symptoms during the pandemic, a substantial minority of an already burdened global mental health workforce experienced persistently poor or deteriorating psychological status over the course of the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":14134,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"747-760"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/6a/pyad046.PMC10586039.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Stress and Occupational Well-Being of Mental Health Professionals: An International Study.\",\"authors\":\"Cary S Kogan, José A Garcia-Pacheco, Tahilia J Rebello, Madeline I Montoya, Rebeca Robles, Brigitte Khoury, Maya Kulygina, Chihiro Matsumoto, Jingjing Huang, María Elena Medina-Mora, Oye Gureje, Dan J Stein, Pratap Sharan, Wolfgang Gaebel, Shigenobu Kanba, Howard F Andrews, Michael C Roberts, Kathleen M Pike, Min Zhao, José Luis Ayuso-Mateos, Karolina Sadowska, Karen Maré, Keith Denny, Geoffrey M Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ijnp/pyad046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increased levels of occupational stress among health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic have been documented. Few studies have examined the effects of the pandemic on mental health professionals despite the heightened demand for their services.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A multilingual, longitudinal, global survey was conducted at 3 time points during the pandemic among members of the World Health Organization's Global Clinical Practice Network. A total of 786 Global Clinical Practice Network members from 86 countries responded to surveys assessing occupational distress, well-being, and posttraumatic stress symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, respondents' well-being deteriorated across time while their posttraumatic stress symptoms showed a modest improvement. Linear growth models indicated that being female, being younger, providing face-to-face health services to patients with COVID-19, having been a target of COVID-related violence, and living in a low- or middle-income country or a country with a higher COVID-19 death rate conveyed greater risk for poor well-being and higher level of stress symptoms over time. Growth mixed modeling identified trajectories of occupational well-being and stress symptoms. Most mental health professions demonstrated no impact to well-being; maintained moderate, nonclinical levels of stress symptoms; or showed improvements after an initial period of difficulty. However, some participant groups exhibited deteriorating well-being approaching the clinical threshold (25.8%) and persistently high and clinically significant levels of posttraumatic stress symptoms (19.6%) over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicates that although most mental health professionals exhibited stable, positive well-being and low stress symptoms during the pandemic, a substantial minority of an already burdened global mental health workforce experienced persistently poor or deteriorating psychological status over the course of the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"747-760\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/6a/pyad046.PMC10586039.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyad046\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijnp/pyad046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新冠肺炎大流行期间,卫生专业人员的职业压力水平有所增加。尽管对心理健康专业人员的服务需求增加,但很少有研究调查疫情对他们的影响。方法:在疫情期间的3个时间点,对世界卫生组织全球临床实践网络的成员进行了一项多语言、纵向的全球调查。来自86个国家的786名全球临床实践网络成员对评估职业痛苦、幸福感和创伤后应激症状的调查做出了回应。结果:平均而言,受访者的幸福感随着时间的推移而恶化,而他们的创伤后应激症状则略有改善。线性增长模型表明,女性、更年轻、为新冠肺炎患者提供面对面的医疗服务、成为新冠肺炎相关暴力的目标、生活在中低收入国家或新冠肺炎死亡率较高的国家,随着时间的推移,健康状况不佳的风险更大,压力症状也更严重。生长混合模型确定了职业幸福感和压力症状的轨迹。大多数心理健康专业对幸福感没有影响;维持中等程度的非临床压力症状;或者在最初的困难时期后表现出改善。然而,随着时间的推移,一些参与者组的健康状况恶化,接近临床阈值(25.8%),创伤后应激症状持续高水平且具有临床意义(19.6%)。结论:这项研究表明,尽管大多数心理健康专业人员在疫情期间表现出稳定、积极的幸福感和低压力症状,但在已经不堪重负的全球心理健康工作人员中,有相当一部分人在疫情期间的心理状况持续不佳或恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Longitudinal Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Stress and Occupational Well-Being of Mental Health Professionals: An International Study.

Background: Increased levels of occupational stress among health professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic have been documented. Few studies have examined the effects of the pandemic on mental health professionals despite the heightened demand for their services.

Method: A multilingual, longitudinal, global survey was conducted at 3 time points during the pandemic among members of the World Health Organization's Global Clinical Practice Network. A total of 786 Global Clinical Practice Network members from 86 countries responded to surveys assessing occupational distress, well-being, and posttraumatic stress symptoms.

Results: On average, respondents' well-being deteriorated across time while their posttraumatic stress symptoms showed a modest improvement. Linear growth models indicated that being female, being younger, providing face-to-face health services to patients with COVID-19, having been a target of COVID-related violence, and living in a low- or middle-income country or a country with a higher COVID-19 death rate conveyed greater risk for poor well-being and higher level of stress symptoms over time. Growth mixed modeling identified trajectories of occupational well-being and stress symptoms. Most mental health professions demonstrated no impact to well-being; maintained moderate, nonclinical levels of stress symptoms; or showed improvements after an initial period of difficulty. However, some participant groups exhibited deteriorating well-being approaching the clinical threshold (25.8%) and persistently high and clinically significant levels of posttraumatic stress symptoms (19.6%) over time.

Conclusions: This study indicates that although most mental health professionals exhibited stable, positive well-being and low stress symptoms during the pandemic, a substantial minority of an already burdened global mental health workforce experienced persistently poor or deteriorating psychological status over the course of the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
230
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The central focus of the journal is on research that advances understanding of existing and new neuropsychopharmacological agents including their mode of action and clinical application or provides insights into the biological basis of psychiatric disorders and thereby advances their pharmacological treatment. Such research may derive from the full spectrum of biological and psychological fields of inquiry encompassing classical and novel techniques in neuropsychopharmacology as well as strategies such as neuroimaging, genetics, psychoneuroendocrinology and neuropsychology.
期刊最新文献
Anhedonia is associated with a specific depression profile and poor antidepressant response. 17β-estradiol Ameliorates Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Aged Mice via miR-138-5p/SIRT1/HMGB1 Pathway. Risk of cognitive decline among patients with dengue virus infection: A systematic review. Epigenome-Wide DNA Methylation in Unipolar Depression: Predictive Biomarker of Antidepressant Treatment Response? Behavioral and neurophysiological signatures of cognitive control in humans and rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1