参加肾脏纵向研究的农业工人的留用情况。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Agromedicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-13 DOI:10.1080/1059924X.2023.2246966
Ioana Albu, Lisa Elon, Nezahualcoyotl Xiuhtecutli, Linda McCauley, Roxana Chicas
{"title":"参加肾脏纵向研究的农业工人的留用情况。","authors":"Ioana Albu, Lisa Elon, Nezahualcoyotl Xiuhtecutli, Linda McCauley, Roxana Chicas","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2023.2246966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The relationship between heat stress, chronic kidney diseases and acute kidney injury has been documented in cross-sectional studies with agricultural workers. However, only a few international studies have assessed renal function in agricultural workers longitudinally. Our research study, Occupational Heat Exposure and Renal Dysfunction (OHEaRD) is the first longitudinal study in the U.S. that monitored renal function in agricultural workers five times over the course of 32-months. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the rate of retention and identify predictors associated with retention in a longitudinal study with agricultural workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In January 2020, we enrolled 119 Florida agricultural workers to observe on 5 workdays over 32 months. Retention was defined by the number of follow-up visits that a participant attended, the consistency of visit attendance, and attendance at the last visit. Participants were provided hemoglobin A1C, lipid panel, creatinine measurement, glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood pressure, and body mass index results and an incentive gift card were handed out to participants at each visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four enrollees did not participate on any workday, thus analysis concentrated on the remaining 115 participants. The majority of participants (64%) completed the 32-month study, 78% completed at least 4 visits, and 55% completed all 5 visits. The statistically significant predictors of higher retention among this study were being older in age (p=0.02), Mexican nationality (p=0.004), working in ferneries (p=0.009), more years working in agriculture (p=0.02), and higher total cholesterol (p=0.02). Appreciation for the health tests was associated with greater participation at the final visit (p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Retention in longitudinal studies is crucial to better understand kidney disease among agricultural workers, an understudied population. Participants reported valuing the access to health results, indicating that implementing point-of-care health screenings and providing the health results to each participant is a good retention strategy. There was some evidence that a participant living with or being related to a fellow co-participant could impact retention as they either showed up or missed visits together, suggesting recruiting from the same household may reduce retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"26-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10841276/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retention of Agricultural Workers Participating in a Renal Longitudinal Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ioana Albu, Lisa Elon, Nezahualcoyotl Xiuhtecutli, Linda McCauley, Roxana Chicas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1059924X.2023.2246966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The relationship between heat stress, chronic kidney diseases and acute kidney injury has been documented in cross-sectional studies with agricultural workers. However, only a few international studies have assessed renal function in agricultural workers longitudinally. Our research study, Occupational Heat Exposure and Renal Dysfunction (OHEaRD) is the first longitudinal study in the U.S. that monitored renal function in agricultural workers five times over the course of 32-months. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the rate of retention and identify predictors associated with retention in a longitudinal study with agricultural workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In January 2020, we enrolled 119 Florida agricultural workers to observe on 5 workdays over 32 months. Retention was defined by the number of follow-up visits that a participant attended, the consistency of visit attendance, and attendance at the last visit. Participants were provided hemoglobin A1C, lipid panel, creatinine measurement, glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood pressure, and body mass index results and an incentive gift card were handed out to participants at each visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four enrollees did not participate on any workday, thus analysis concentrated on the remaining 115 participants. The majority of participants (64%) completed the 32-month study, 78% completed at least 4 visits, and 55% completed all 5 visits. The statistically significant predictors of higher retention among this study were being older in age (p=0.02), Mexican nationality (p=0.004), working in ferneries (p=0.009), more years working in agriculture (p=0.02), and higher total cholesterol (p=0.02). Appreciation for the health tests was associated with greater participation at the final visit (p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Retention in longitudinal studies is crucial to better understand kidney disease among agricultural workers, an understudied population. Participants reported valuing the access to health results, indicating that implementing point-of-care health screenings and providing the health results to each participant is a good retention strategy. There was some evidence that a participant living with or being related to a fellow co-participant could impact retention as they either showed up or missed visits together, suggesting recruiting from the same household may reduce retention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agromedicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"26-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10841276/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agromedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2023.2246966\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agromedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2023.2246966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对农业工人进行的横断面研究已证实了热应激、慢性肾病和急性肾损伤之间的关系。然而,国际上只有少数研究对农业工人的肾功能进行了纵向评估。我们的研究项目 "职业热暴露与肾功能障碍(OHEaRD)"是美国第一项纵向研究,在 32 个月的时间里对农业工人的肾功能进行了五次监测。本研究的主要目的是评估农业工人在纵向研究中的保留率,并确定与保留率相关的预测因素:2020 年 1 月,我们招募了 119 名佛罗里达州的农业工人,在 32 个月内对他们的 5 个工作日进行观察。保留率根据参与者参加随访的次数、参加随访的一致性以及最后一次随访的出席率来定义。每次随访都会向参与者提供血红蛋白 A1C、血脂检查、肌酐测量、肾小球滤过率 (eGFR)、血压和体重指数结果,并向参与者发放奖励礼品卡:有四名参加者没有参加任何工作日的活动,因此对其余 115 名参加者进行了分析。大多数参与者(64%)完成了为期 32 个月的研究,78% 完成了至少 4 次就诊,55% 完成了全部 5 次就诊。在这项研究中,年龄较大(p=0.02)、墨西哥籍(p=0.004)、在林业部门工作(p=0.009)、从事农业工作年限较长(p=0.02)和总胆固醇较高(p=0.02)在统计学上具有重大意义。对健康测试的赞赏与最后一次访问时更多人参与有关(p=0.01):纵向研究中的保留率对于更好地了解农业工人这一研究不足的人群中的肾脏疾病至关重要。参与者表示非常重视获得健康结果,这表明实施护理点健康筛查并向每位参与者提供健康结果是一种很好的留住参与者策略。有证据表明,与其他共同参与者居住在一起或与其有亲属关系的参与者可能会影响保留率,因为他们要么一起出现,要么一起缺席探访,这表明从同一家庭招募可能会降低保留率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retention of Agricultural Workers Participating in a Renal Longitudinal Study.

Objectives: The relationship between heat stress, chronic kidney diseases and acute kidney injury has been documented in cross-sectional studies with agricultural workers. However, only a few international studies have assessed renal function in agricultural workers longitudinally. Our research study, Occupational Heat Exposure and Renal Dysfunction (OHEaRD) is the first longitudinal study in the U.S. that monitored renal function in agricultural workers five times over the course of 32-months. The main objectives of this study were to evaluate the rate of retention and identify predictors associated with retention in a longitudinal study with agricultural workers.

Methods: In January 2020, we enrolled 119 Florida agricultural workers to observe on 5 workdays over 32 months. Retention was defined by the number of follow-up visits that a participant attended, the consistency of visit attendance, and attendance at the last visit. Participants were provided hemoglobin A1C, lipid panel, creatinine measurement, glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood pressure, and body mass index results and an incentive gift card were handed out to participants at each visit.

Results: Four enrollees did not participate on any workday, thus analysis concentrated on the remaining 115 participants. The majority of participants (64%) completed the 32-month study, 78% completed at least 4 visits, and 55% completed all 5 visits. The statistically significant predictors of higher retention among this study were being older in age (p=0.02), Mexican nationality (p=0.004), working in ferneries (p=0.009), more years working in agriculture (p=0.02), and higher total cholesterol (p=0.02). Appreciation for the health tests was associated with greater participation at the final visit (p=0.01).

Conclusion: Retention in longitudinal studies is crucial to better understand kidney disease among agricultural workers, an understudied population. Participants reported valuing the access to health results, indicating that implementing point-of-care health screenings and providing the health results to each participant is a good retention strategy. There was some evidence that a participant living with or being related to a fellow co-participant could impact retention as they either showed up or missed visits together, suggesting recruiting from the same household may reduce retention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agromedicine
Journal of Agromedicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agromedicine: Practice, Policy, and Research publishes translational research, reports and editorials related to agricultural health, safety and medicine. The Journal of Agromedicine seeks to engage the global agricultural health and safety community including rural health care providers, agricultural health and safety practitioners, academic researchers, government agencies, policy makers, and others. The Journal of Agromedicine is committed to providing its readers with relevant, rigorously peer-reviewed, original articles. The journal welcomes high quality submissions as they relate to agricultural health and safety in the areas of: • Behavioral and Mental Health • Climate Change • Education/Training • Emerging Practices • Environmental Public Health • Epidemiology • Ergonomics • Injury Prevention • Occupational and Industrial Health • Pesticides • Policy • Safety Interventions and Evaluation • Technology
期刊最新文献
Small Scale Fisheries and the Challenges of Occupational Safety and Health. Using Land-Based Simulation to Perform Crew Overboard Recovery Training and Research. Nationally Connected Network of Trainers Empowers Fishers as Medical First Responders: A Case Study in Collaboration and Capacity Building. Making Safety an Easy Catch: PFD Use Among Commercial Fishermen in New England. Ensuring Safety at Sea: A Call to Action for Small-Scale Fishing Communities in Developing Countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1