辅助医务人员与全科医生的关系:范围界定审查。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Australian journal of primary health Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1071/PY23060
Sarah Petschack, Robert Lasslett, Linda Ross
{"title":"辅助医务人员与全科医生的关系:范围界定审查。","authors":"Sarah Petschack, Robert Lasslett, Linda Ross","doi":"10.1071/PY23060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Health services internationally are implementing programs that increase working ties between paramedics and general practitioners (GPs) to reduce unnecessary transport to emergency departments (EDs) and improve access to primary health care. As paramedic involvement in primary health care develops, there is increasing focus on the GP-paramedic collaborative relationship. Resulting issues regarding professional boundaries may occur, as paramedics practice in fields that were previously solely in the GP scope. An effective paramedic-GP working relationship will be an essential foundation to the success of future strategies. METHODS A search of three electronic databases was completed (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase Classic+Embase and CINAHL Plus). Eligibility for inclusion required analysis of the relationship between paramedics and GPs. All processes were completed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS After removal of duplicates, 4995 titles were screened by title and/or abstract. After full-text review, 15 studies were included. Five themes were identified that contribute significantly to the strengths and weaknesses of the relationship - the importance of communication, understanding scope of practice, leadership roles, responsibility for patient care and interdisciplinary training. Issues identified included significant variation in the structure of different emergency medical services and varying standards of education requirements for paramedics worldwide. CONCLUSIONS There were no published Australian studies that had the primary aim of examining the paramedic-GP relationship. The depth of research on this topic is lacking, despite increased interest over the past decade. The relevance of the international literature to the Australian setting is questionable.","PeriodicalId":8651,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":" ","pages":"547-557"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The paramedic-general practitioner relationship: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Petschack, Robert Lasslett, Linda Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/PY23060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND Health services internationally are implementing programs that increase working ties between paramedics and general practitioners (GPs) to reduce unnecessary transport to emergency departments (EDs) and improve access to primary health care. As paramedic involvement in primary health care develops, there is increasing focus on the GP-paramedic collaborative relationship. Resulting issues regarding professional boundaries may occur, as paramedics practice in fields that were previously solely in the GP scope. An effective paramedic-GP working relationship will be an essential foundation to the success of future strategies. METHODS A search of three electronic databases was completed (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase Classic+Embase and CINAHL Plus). Eligibility for inclusion required analysis of the relationship between paramedics and GPs. All processes were completed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS After removal of duplicates, 4995 titles were screened by title and/or abstract. After full-text review, 15 studies were included. Five themes were identified that contribute significantly to the strengths and weaknesses of the relationship - the importance of communication, understanding scope of practice, leadership roles, responsibility for patient care and interdisciplinary training. Issues identified included significant variation in the structure of different emergency medical services and varying standards of education requirements for paramedics worldwide. CONCLUSIONS There were no published Australian studies that had the primary aim of examining the paramedic-GP relationship. The depth of research on this topic is lacking, despite increased interest over the past decade. The relevance of the international literature to the Australian setting is questionable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"547-557\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of primary health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY23060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:国际卫生服务机构正在实施一些计划,以加强辅助医务人员与全科医生(GPs)之间的工作联系,从而减少不必要的急诊室转运,并改善初级医疗保健的可及性。随着辅助医务人员参与初级医疗保健的发展,全科医生与辅助医务人员之间的合作关系日益受到关注。由于辅助医务人员从事的领域以前完全属于全科医生的工作范围,因此可能会出现有关专业界限的问题。有效的辅助医务人员与全科医生的工作关系将是未来战略取得成功的重要基础:方法:对三个电子数据库(Ovid MEDLINE、Embase Classic+ Embase 和 CINAHL Plus)进行了检索。纳入的资格要求对辅助医务人员和全科医生之间的关系进行分析。所有过程均由两名独立审稿人完成:去除重复内容后,通过标题和/或摘要筛选出 4995 篇研究。全文审阅后,共纳入 15 项研究。确定了五个主题,它们在很大程度上反映了这种关系的优缺点--沟通的重要性、对执业范围的理解、领导角色、对患者护理的责任以及跨学科培训。所发现的问题包括不同紧急医疗服务机构的结构存在很大差异,以及世界各地对辅助医务人员的教育要求标准不一:目前,澳大利亚尚未发表以研究辅助医务人员与医生关系为主要目的的研究报告。尽管在过去十年中,人们对这一主题的兴趣日益浓厚,但这方面的研究却缺乏深度。国际文献与澳大利亚环境的相关性值得怀疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The paramedic-general practitioner relationship: a scoping review.
BACKGROUND Health services internationally are implementing programs that increase working ties between paramedics and general practitioners (GPs) to reduce unnecessary transport to emergency departments (EDs) and improve access to primary health care. As paramedic involvement in primary health care develops, there is increasing focus on the GP-paramedic collaborative relationship. Resulting issues regarding professional boundaries may occur, as paramedics practice in fields that were previously solely in the GP scope. An effective paramedic-GP working relationship will be an essential foundation to the success of future strategies. METHODS A search of three electronic databases was completed (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase Classic+Embase and CINAHL Plus). Eligibility for inclusion required analysis of the relationship between paramedics and GPs. All processes were completed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS After removal of duplicates, 4995 titles were screened by title and/or abstract. After full-text review, 15 studies were included. Five themes were identified that contribute significantly to the strengths and weaknesses of the relationship - the importance of communication, understanding scope of practice, leadership roles, responsibility for patient care and interdisciplinary training. Issues identified included significant variation in the structure of different emergency medical services and varying standards of education requirements for paramedics worldwide. CONCLUSIONS There were no published Australian studies that had the primary aim of examining the paramedic-GP relationship. The depth of research on this topic is lacking, despite increased interest over the past decade. The relevance of the international literature to the Australian setting is questionable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian journal of primary health
Australian journal of primary health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Primary Health integrates the theory and practise of community health services and primary health care. The journal publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research, reviews, policy reports and analyses from around the world. Articles cover a range of issues influencing community health services and primary health care, particularly comprehensive primary health care research, evidence-based practice (excluding discipline-specific clinical interventions) and primary health care policy issues. Australian Journal of Primary Health is an important international resource for all individuals and organisations involved in the planning, provision or practise of primary health care. Australian Journal of Primary Health is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University.
期刊最新文献
Australian healthcare professionals’ beliefs and practice behaviours in management of chronic pelvic pain: a cross-sectional survey General practice registrars’ practice in outer metropolitan Australia: a cross-sectional comparison with rural and inner metropolitan areas Hepatitis C elimination: amplifying the role of primary care nurses in Australia Abstracts of the Australasian Association for Academic Primary Care (AAAPC) Annual Research Conference Older patients want to talk about sexual health in Australian primary care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1