通过确认重要状态在数据库中查找“僵尸”。

Q4 Medicine Journal of registry management Pub Date : 2023-01-01
David K O'Brien
{"title":"通过确认重要状态在数据库中查找“僵尸”。","authors":"David K O'Brien","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Alaska Cancer Registry (ACR) conducted a study to identify and correct the vital status of certain cases in its database. These cases were reported as <i>deceased</i> by the original reporting health care facility but were not identified as being deceased using routine death resources. Cases incorrectly reported as deceased are referred to here as \"zombies,\" as they are the \"living dead\" in the registry database. Zombie cases are problematic as they contribute toward artificially high mortality rates and artificially low survival rates. They are the opposite of \"immortals,\" a term used in the literature to indicate cases that are alive in the registry database but are actually deceased. To start the study, ACR first linked its registry database to the state mortality database, the Social Security Death Index (SSDI), and the National Death Index (NDI). ACR has 3 non-North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) flag fields indicating the status of the linkage with these 3 data sources. ACR was able to identify zombie candidates by selecting deceased cases that did not successfully link with any of these 3 mortality data sources. After all 3 linkages were completed, ACR identified 20 zombie candidates out of 19,590 deceased cases. ACR researched these patients in several state-specific databases and found that 14 of them were true zombies and changed their vital status to <i>alive</i>. Of the remaining 6 deceased cases, 3 died out of country, 2 died in state, and 1 died out of state. ACR recommends that other state registries consider adding these 3 non-NAACCR mortality database flag fields, as they would make searching for zombie cases fairly routine. It would also serve as a way to perform a quality control check on deceased cases that accidentally become alive again after consolidation with a new facility source record.</p>","PeriodicalId":39246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of registry management","volume":"50 2","pages":"57-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414203/pdf/jrm-50-57.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding \\\"Zombies\\\" in Your Database by Confirming Vital Status.\",\"authors\":\"David K O'Brien\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Alaska Cancer Registry (ACR) conducted a study to identify and correct the vital status of certain cases in its database. These cases were reported as <i>deceased</i> by the original reporting health care facility but were not identified as being deceased using routine death resources. Cases incorrectly reported as deceased are referred to here as \\\"zombies,\\\" as they are the \\\"living dead\\\" in the registry database. Zombie cases are problematic as they contribute toward artificially high mortality rates and artificially low survival rates. They are the opposite of \\\"immortals,\\\" a term used in the literature to indicate cases that are alive in the registry database but are actually deceased. To start the study, ACR first linked its registry database to the state mortality database, the Social Security Death Index (SSDI), and the National Death Index (NDI). ACR has 3 non-North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) flag fields indicating the status of the linkage with these 3 data sources. ACR was able to identify zombie candidates by selecting deceased cases that did not successfully link with any of these 3 mortality data sources. After all 3 linkages were completed, ACR identified 20 zombie candidates out of 19,590 deceased cases. ACR researched these patients in several state-specific databases and found that 14 of them were true zombies and changed their vital status to <i>alive</i>. Of the remaining 6 deceased cases, 3 died out of country, 2 died in state, and 1 died out of state. ACR recommends that other state registries consider adding these 3 non-NAACCR mortality database flag fields, as they would make searching for zombie cases fairly routine. It would also serve as a way to perform a quality control check on deceased cases that accidentally become alive again after consolidation with a new facility source record.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of registry management\",\"volume\":\"50 2\",\"pages\":\"57-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10414203/pdf/jrm-50-57.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of registry management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of registry management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿拉斯加癌症登记处(ACR)进行了一项研究,以确定和纠正其数据库中某些病例的重要状态。这些病例由最初报告的卫生保健机构报告为死亡,但未通过常规死亡资源确定为死亡。错误报告为死亡的病例在这里被称为“僵尸”,因为它们是注册数据库中的“活死人”。僵尸案例是有问题的,因为它们导致了人为的高死亡率和人为的低存活率。它们与“不朽者”相反,“不朽者”一词在文献中用来表示在注册表数据库中存活但实际上已经死亡的病例。为了开始这项研究,ACR首先将其注册数据库与州死亡率数据库、社会安全死亡指数(SSDI)和国家死亡指数(NDI)联系起来。ACR有3个非北美中央癌症登记协会(NAACCR)标志字段,表明与这3个数据源的链接状态。ACR能够通过选择与这三个死亡率数据源中的任何一个都没有成功联系的死亡病例来识别僵尸候选病例。在完成所有3种联系后,ACR从19590例死亡病例中确定了20例僵尸候选病例。ACR在几个特定状态的数据库中研究了这些患者,发现其中14人是真正的僵尸,并将他们的生命状态更改为活着。在其余6例死亡病例中,3例死于国外,2例死于州内,1例死于州外。ACR建议其他州的注册中心考虑添加这3个非naaccr死亡率数据库标志字段,因为它们将使搜索僵尸病例变得相当常规。它还可以作为一种对与新设施来源记录合并后意外复活的死亡病例进行质量控制检查的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Finding "Zombies" in Your Database by Confirming Vital Status.

The Alaska Cancer Registry (ACR) conducted a study to identify and correct the vital status of certain cases in its database. These cases were reported as deceased by the original reporting health care facility but were not identified as being deceased using routine death resources. Cases incorrectly reported as deceased are referred to here as "zombies," as they are the "living dead" in the registry database. Zombie cases are problematic as they contribute toward artificially high mortality rates and artificially low survival rates. They are the opposite of "immortals," a term used in the literature to indicate cases that are alive in the registry database but are actually deceased. To start the study, ACR first linked its registry database to the state mortality database, the Social Security Death Index (SSDI), and the National Death Index (NDI). ACR has 3 non-North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR) flag fields indicating the status of the linkage with these 3 data sources. ACR was able to identify zombie candidates by selecting deceased cases that did not successfully link with any of these 3 mortality data sources. After all 3 linkages were completed, ACR identified 20 zombie candidates out of 19,590 deceased cases. ACR researched these patients in several state-specific databases and found that 14 of them were true zombies and changed their vital status to alive. Of the remaining 6 deceased cases, 3 died out of country, 2 died in state, and 1 died out of state. ACR recommends that other state registries consider adding these 3 non-NAACCR mortality database flag fields, as they would make searching for zombie cases fairly routine. It would also serve as a way to perform a quality control check on deceased cases that accidentally become alive again after consolidation with a new facility source record.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of registry management
Journal of registry management Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
JRM Editors Past and Present (1995-2024). Cancer Registry Enrichment via Linkage with Hospital-Based Electronic Medical Records: A Pilot Investigation. Health Care Utilization Prior to Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis in Publicly Insured Individuals in New York State. Letter from the Editor. Planning for the Future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1