TrueBeam线性加速器装置中强度调制放射治疗和RapidArc综合治疗计划测试的应用。

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-29 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_56_22
Soumya Roy, Biplab Sarkar, Anirudh Pradhan
{"title":"TrueBeam线性加速器装置中强度调制放射治疗和RapidArc综合治疗计划测试的应用。","authors":"Soumya Roy,&nbsp;Biplab Sarkar,&nbsp;Anirudh Pradhan","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_56_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An extended version of task group report (TG)-119 dosimetric tests was introduced and tested on the TrueBeam linear accelerator setup. Treatment plan results and quality assurance (QA) results of RapidArc (RA) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were compared to understand the limitation and efficacy of the RA and IMRT system of the linear accelerator. Test structure sets were drawn on OCTAVIUS four-dimensional (4D) phantom computed tomography scan data for this study. We generated treatment plans based on the specified goal in the Eclipse™ treatment planning system using RA and IMRT in the study phantom. We used the same planning objectives for RA and IMRT techniques. Planar dose verification was performed using electronic portal imaging device and OCTAVIUS 4D phantom. The treatment log file was further analyzed using Pylinac (V2.4.0 (Open Source Code library available on Github, runs under Python programming language)) to compare the dosimetric outcome of RA and IMRT. Dose to the planning target volume (PTV) 1-5 and organ at risk (OAR) were analyzed in this study for the efficiency comparison of RA and IMRT. The primary objective was accomplished by adhering to the dose constraints associated with PTV 2 and the OAR. RA and IMRT also met the secondary objective. The tertiary goal of dose delivery to PTV 4 was met with RA but not IMRT. This study can be utilized to compare different institutions' planning and patient-specific QA (PSQA) procedures. The findings of this study were in line with the published works of the literature. A multi-institutional planning and delivery accuracy audit can be built using this structure and set of planning objectives having similar PSQA phantom. The TG-119 report incorporated test challenges that were combined in a single study set and a single plan. This reduces the complexity of performing the original TG-119 tests, whereas keeping the challenges as introduced in the TG-119 report. This study's planning and dosimetric results could be further utilized for dosimetry audit with any institute having a linear accelerator and OCTAVIUS 4D phantom for PSQA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"48 2","pages":"204-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/a1/JMP-48-204.PMC10419748.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of a Comprehensive Treatment Planning Test for Credentialing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and RapidArc in a TrueBeam Linear Accelerator Setup.\",\"authors\":\"Soumya Roy,&nbsp;Biplab Sarkar,&nbsp;Anirudh Pradhan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmp.jmp_56_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An extended version of task group report (TG)-119 dosimetric tests was introduced and tested on the TrueBeam linear accelerator setup. Treatment plan results and quality assurance (QA) results of RapidArc (RA) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were compared to understand the limitation and efficacy of the RA and IMRT system of the linear accelerator. Test structure sets were drawn on OCTAVIUS four-dimensional (4D) phantom computed tomography scan data for this study. We generated treatment plans based on the specified goal in the Eclipse™ treatment planning system using RA and IMRT in the study phantom. We used the same planning objectives for RA and IMRT techniques. Planar dose verification was performed using electronic portal imaging device and OCTAVIUS 4D phantom. The treatment log file was further analyzed using Pylinac (V2.4.0 (Open Source Code library available on Github, runs under Python programming language)) to compare the dosimetric outcome of RA and IMRT. Dose to the planning target volume (PTV) 1-5 and organ at risk (OAR) were analyzed in this study for the efficiency comparison of RA and IMRT. The primary objective was accomplished by adhering to the dose constraints associated with PTV 2 and the OAR. RA and IMRT also met the secondary objective. The tertiary goal of dose delivery to PTV 4 was met with RA but not IMRT. This study can be utilized to compare different institutions' planning and patient-specific QA (PSQA) procedures. The findings of this study were in line with the published works of the literature. A multi-institutional planning and delivery accuracy audit can be built using this structure and set of planning objectives having similar PSQA phantom. The TG-119 report incorporated test challenges that were combined in a single study set and a single plan. This reduces the complexity of performing the original TG-119 tests, whereas keeping the challenges as introduced in the TG-119 report. This study's planning and dosimetric results could be further utilized for dosimetry audit with any institute having a linear accelerator and OCTAVIUS 4D phantom for PSQA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"204-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/a1/JMP-48-204.PMC10419748.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_56_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_56_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍了任务组报告(TG)-119剂量测定测试的扩展版本,并在TrueBeam线性加速器装置上进行了测试。比较RapidArc(RA)和调强放疗(IMRT)的治疗计划结果和质量保证(QA)结果,以了解直线加速器的RA和IMRT系统的局限性和疗效。测试结构集是根据OCTAVIUS四维(4D)体模计算机断层扫描数据绘制的,用于本研究。我们根据Eclipse中指定的目标生成了治疗计划™ 在研究体模中使用RA和IMRT的治疗计划系统。我们对RA和IMRT技术使用了相同的规划目标。使用电子门静脉成像设备和OCTAVIUS 4D体模进行平面剂量验证。使用Pylinac(V2.4.0(Github上的开源代码库,在Python编程语言下运行)对治疗日志文件进行了进一步分析,以比较RA和IMRT的剂量测定结果。本研究分析了计划目标体积(PTV)1-5和危险器官(OAR)的剂量,以比较RA和IMRT的效率。主要目标是通过遵守与PTV 2和OAR相关的剂量限制来实现的。RA和IMRT也达到了次要目标。PTV4剂量传递的第三个目标是RA,而不是IMRT。本研究可用于比较不同机构的计划和患者特异性QA(PSQA)程序。这项研究的结果与已发表的文献一致。可以使用这种结构和具有类似PSQA幻影的规划目标集来建立多机构规划和交付准确性审计。TG-119报告将测试挑战合并到一个单独的研究集和一个单一的计划中。这降低了执行原始TG-119测试的复杂性,同时保留了TG-119报告中介绍的挑战。本研究的规划和剂量测定结果可进一步用于任何拥有线性加速器和OCTAVIUS 4D PSQA体模的机构的剂量测定审计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of a Comprehensive Treatment Planning Test for Credentialing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and RapidArc in a TrueBeam Linear Accelerator Setup.

An extended version of task group report (TG)-119 dosimetric tests was introduced and tested on the TrueBeam linear accelerator setup. Treatment plan results and quality assurance (QA) results of RapidArc (RA) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) were compared to understand the limitation and efficacy of the RA and IMRT system of the linear accelerator. Test structure sets were drawn on OCTAVIUS four-dimensional (4D) phantom computed tomography scan data for this study. We generated treatment plans based on the specified goal in the Eclipse™ treatment planning system using RA and IMRT in the study phantom. We used the same planning objectives for RA and IMRT techniques. Planar dose verification was performed using electronic portal imaging device and OCTAVIUS 4D phantom. The treatment log file was further analyzed using Pylinac (V2.4.0 (Open Source Code library available on Github, runs under Python programming language)) to compare the dosimetric outcome of RA and IMRT. Dose to the planning target volume (PTV) 1-5 and organ at risk (OAR) were analyzed in this study for the efficiency comparison of RA and IMRT. The primary objective was accomplished by adhering to the dose constraints associated with PTV 2 and the OAR. RA and IMRT also met the secondary objective. The tertiary goal of dose delivery to PTV 4 was met with RA but not IMRT. This study can be utilized to compare different institutions' planning and patient-specific QA (PSQA) procedures. The findings of this study were in line with the published works of the literature. A multi-institutional planning and delivery accuracy audit can be built using this structure and set of planning objectives having similar PSQA phantom. The TG-119 report incorporated test challenges that were combined in a single study set and a single plan. This reduces the complexity of performing the original TG-119 tests, whereas keeping the challenges as introduced in the TG-119 report. This study's planning and dosimetric results could be further utilized for dosimetry audit with any institute having a linear accelerator and OCTAVIUS 4D phantom for PSQA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
A Segmentation-based Automated Calculation of Patient Size and Size-specific Dose Estimates in Pediatric Computed Tomography Scans. A Study on Radiation Level at the Treatment Plane Due to Induced Activity in Linear Accelerator Head. Advancements and Applications of Three-dimensional Printing Technology in Surgery. Agar-based Phantom for Evaluating Targeting of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Systems for Breast Ablation. An Analysis of Radiotherapy Machine Requirements in India: Impact of the Pandemic and Regional Disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1