J Jasmin Güven, Nora Molkenthin, Steffen Mühle, Antonia S J S Mey
{"title":"几何约束模型可以告诉我们真实世界的蛋白质接触图。","authors":"J Jasmin Güven, Nora Molkenthin, Steffen Mühle, Antonia S J S Mey","doi":"10.1088/1478-3975/acd543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mechanisms by which a protein's 3D structure can be determined based on its amino acid sequence have long been one of the key mysteries of biophysics. Often simplistic models, such as those derived from geometric constraints, capture bulk real-world 3D protein-protein properties well. One approach is using protein contact maps (PCMs) to better understand proteins' properties. In this study, we explore the emergent behaviour of contact maps for different geometrically constrained models and compare them to real-world protein systems. Specifically, we derive an analytical approximation for the distribution of amino acid distances, denoted as<i>P</i>(<i>s</i>), using a mean-field approach based on a geometric constraint model. This approximation is then validated for amino acid distance distributions generated from a 2D and 3D version of the geometrically constrained random interaction model. For real protein data, we show how the analytical approximation can be used to fit amino acid distance distributions of protein chain lengths of<i>L</i> ≈ 100,<i>L</i> ≈ 200, and<i>L</i> ≈ 300 generated from two different methods of evaluating a PCM, a simple cutoff based method and a shadow map based method. We present evidence that geometric constraints are sufficient to model the amino acid distance distributions of protein chains in bulk and amino acid sequences only play a secondary role, regardless of the definition of the PCM.</p>","PeriodicalId":20207,"journal":{"name":"Physical biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What geometrically constrained models can tell us about real-world protein contact maps.\",\"authors\":\"J Jasmin Güven, Nora Molkenthin, Steffen Mühle, Antonia S J S Mey\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1478-3975/acd543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The mechanisms by which a protein's 3D structure can be determined based on its amino acid sequence have long been one of the key mysteries of biophysics. Often simplistic models, such as those derived from geometric constraints, capture bulk real-world 3D protein-protein properties well. One approach is using protein contact maps (PCMs) to better understand proteins' properties. In this study, we explore the emergent behaviour of contact maps for different geometrically constrained models and compare them to real-world protein systems. Specifically, we derive an analytical approximation for the distribution of amino acid distances, denoted as<i>P</i>(<i>s</i>), using a mean-field approach based on a geometric constraint model. This approximation is then validated for amino acid distance distributions generated from a 2D and 3D version of the geometrically constrained random interaction model. For real protein data, we show how the analytical approximation can be used to fit amino acid distance distributions of protein chain lengths of<i>L</i> ≈ 100,<i>L</i> ≈ 200, and<i>L</i> ≈ 300 generated from two different methods of evaluating a PCM, a simple cutoff based method and a shadow map based method. We present evidence that geometric constraints are sufficient to model the amino acid distance distributions of protein chains in bulk and amino acid sequences only play a secondary role, regardless of the definition of the PCM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/acd543\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/acd543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
What geometrically constrained models can tell us about real-world protein contact maps.
The mechanisms by which a protein's 3D structure can be determined based on its amino acid sequence have long been one of the key mysteries of biophysics. Often simplistic models, such as those derived from geometric constraints, capture bulk real-world 3D protein-protein properties well. One approach is using protein contact maps (PCMs) to better understand proteins' properties. In this study, we explore the emergent behaviour of contact maps for different geometrically constrained models and compare them to real-world protein systems. Specifically, we derive an analytical approximation for the distribution of amino acid distances, denoted asP(s), using a mean-field approach based on a geometric constraint model. This approximation is then validated for amino acid distance distributions generated from a 2D and 3D version of the geometrically constrained random interaction model. For real protein data, we show how the analytical approximation can be used to fit amino acid distance distributions of protein chain lengths ofL ≈ 100,L ≈ 200, andL ≈ 300 generated from two different methods of evaluating a PCM, a simple cutoff based method and a shadow map based method. We present evidence that geometric constraints are sufficient to model the amino acid distance distributions of protein chains in bulk and amino acid sequences only play a secondary role, regardless of the definition of the PCM.
期刊介绍:
Physical Biology publishes articles in the broad interdisciplinary field bridging biology with the physical sciences and engineering. This journal focuses on research in which quantitative approaches – experimental, theoretical and modeling – lead to new insights into biological systems at all scales of space and time, and all levels of organizational complexity.
Physical Biology accepts contributions from a wide range of biological sub-fields, including topics such as:
molecular biophysics, including single molecule studies, protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions
subcellular structures, organelle dynamics, membranes, protein assemblies, chromosome structure
intracellular processes, e.g. cytoskeleton dynamics, cellular transport, cell division
systems biology, e.g. signaling, gene regulation and metabolic networks
cells and their microenvironment, e.g. cell mechanics and motility, chemotaxis, extracellular matrix, biofilms
cell-material interactions, e.g. biointerfaces, electrical stimulation and sensing, endocytosis
cell-cell interactions, cell aggregates, organoids, tissues and organs
developmental dynamics, including pattern formation and morphogenesis
physical and evolutionary aspects of disease, e.g. cancer progression, amyloid formation
neuronal systems, including information processing by networks, memory and learning
population dynamics, ecology, and evolution
collective action and emergence of collective phenomena.