图像引导放射治疗的室内容积成像剂量评估:一项多机构研究。

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-29 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_109_22
Yusuke Sakai, Hajime Monzen, Yoshiki Takei, Hiroyuki Kosaka, Kenji Nakamura, Yuya Yanagi, Kazuki Wakabayashi, Makoto Hosono, Yasumasa Nishimura
{"title":"图像引导放射治疗的室内容积成像剂量评估:一项多机构研究。","authors":"Yusuke Sakai,&nbsp;Hajime Monzen,&nbsp;Yoshiki Takei,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kosaka,&nbsp;Kenji Nakamura,&nbsp;Yuya Yanagi,&nbsp;Kazuki Wakabayashi,&nbsp;Makoto Hosono,&nbsp;Yasumasa Nishimura","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_109_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We investigated imaging dose and noise under clinical scan conditions at multiple institutions using a simple and unified method, and demonstrated the need for diagnostic reference levels in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Nine cone-beam and helical computed tomography (CT) scanners (Varian, Elekta, Accuray Inc., and BrainLAB) from seven institutions were investigated in this study. The weighted cone-beam dose index (CBDI<sub>w</sub>) was calculated for head and pelvic protocols using a 100 mm pencil chamber under the conditions used in actual clinical practice at each institution. Cone-beam CT image noise was evaluated using polymethylmethacrylate head and body phantoms with diameters of 16 and 32 cm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For head and pelvic protocols, CBDI<sub>w</sub> values ranged from 0.94-6.59 and 1.47-20.9 mGy, respectively. Similarly, standard deviation (SD) values ranged from 9.3-34.0 and 26.9-97.4 HU, respectively. The SD values tended to increase with decreasing imaging dose (<i>r</i> = -0.33 and -0.61 for the head and pelvic protocols, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the nine machines, the imaging dose for high imaging dose institutions was approximately 20 mGy to the pelvic phantom, and there was a 14-fold difference in dose compared with the other institutions. These results suggest the need to establish DRLs for IGRT to guide clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"48 2","pages":"189-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/ca/JMP-48-189.PMC10419753.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yusuke Sakai,&nbsp;Hajime Monzen,&nbsp;Yoshiki Takei,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kosaka,&nbsp;Kenji Nakamura,&nbsp;Yuya Yanagi,&nbsp;Kazuki Wakabayashi,&nbsp;Makoto Hosono,&nbsp;Yasumasa Nishimura\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmp.jmp_109_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We investigated imaging dose and noise under clinical scan conditions at multiple institutions using a simple and unified method, and demonstrated the need for diagnostic reference levels in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Nine cone-beam and helical computed tomography (CT) scanners (Varian, Elekta, Accuray Inc., and BrainLAB) from seven institutions were investigated in this study. The weighted cone-beam dose index (CBDI<sub>w</sub>) was calculated for head and pelvic protocols using a 100 mm pencil chamber under the conditions used in actual clinical practice at each institution. Cone-beam CT image noise was evaluated using polymethylmethacrylate head and body phantoms with diameters of 16 and 32 cm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For head and pelvic protocols, CBDI<sub>w</sub> values ranged from 0.94-6.59 and 1.47-20.9 mGy, respectively. Similarly, standard deviation (SD) values ranged from 9.3-34.0 and 26.9-97.4 HU, respectively. The SD values tended to increase with decreasing imaging dose (<i>r</i> = -0.33 and -0.61 for the head and pelvic protocols, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the nine machines, the imaging dose for high imaging dose institutions was approximately 20 mGy to the pelvic phantom, and there was a 14-fold difference in dose compared with the other institutions. These results suggest the need to establish DRLs for IGRT to guide clinical decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"189-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/ca/JMP-48-189.PMC10419753.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_109_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_109_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们使用一种简单统一的方法研究了多个机构在临床扫描条件下的成像剂量和噪声,并证明了在图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)中对诊断参考水平的需求。材料和方法:本研究调查了来自七家机构的九台锥形和螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描仪(Varian、Elekta、Accuray股份有限公司和BrainLAB)。在每个机构的实际临床实践中使用的条件下,使用100mm铅笔室计算头部和骨盆方案的加权锥形束剂量指数(CBDIw)。使用直径分别为16和32cm的聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯头部和身体模型评估锥束CT图像噪声。结果:对于头部和骨盆方案,CBDIw值分别为0.94-6.59和1.47-2.9 mGy。类似地,标准偏差(SD)值的范围分别为9.3-34.0和26.9-97.4 HU。SD值倾向于随着成像剂量的减少而增加(头部和骨盆方案分别为-0.33和-0.61)。结论:在9台机器中,高成像剂量机构的成像剂量约为骨盆体模的20mGy,与其他机构相比,剂量相差14倍。这些结果表明,有必要为IGRT建立DRL,以指导临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study.

Aims: We investigated imaging dose and noise under clinical scan conditions at multiple institutions using a simple and unified method, and demonstrated the need for diagnostic reference levels in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT).

Materials and methods: Nine cone-beam and helical computed tomography (CT) scanners (Varian, Elekta, Accuray Inc., and BrainLAB) from seven institutions were investigated in this study. The weighted cone-beam dose index (CBDIw) was calculated for head and pelvic protocols using a 100 mm pencil chamber under the conditions used in actual clinical practice at each institution. Cone-beam CT image noise was evaluated using polymethylmethacrylate head and body phantoms with diameters of 16 and 32 cm, respectively.

Results: For head and pelvic protocols, CBDIw values ranged from 0.94-6.59 and 1.47-20.9 mGy, respectively. Similarly, standard deviation (SD) values ranged from 9.3-34.0 and 26.9-97.4 HU, respectively. The SD values tended to increase with decreasing imaging dose (r = -0.33 and -0.61 for the head and pelvic protocols, respectively).

Conclusions: Among the nine machines, the imaging dose for high imaging dose institutions was approximately 20 mGy to the pelvic phantom, and there was a 14-fold difference in dose compared with the other institutions. These results suggest the need to establish DRLs for IGRT to guide clinical decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
A Segmentation-based Automated Calculation of Patient Size and Size-specific Dose Estimates in Pediatric Computed Tomography Scans. A Study on Radiation Level at the Treatment Plane Due to Induced Activity in Linear Accelerator Head. Advancements and Applications of Three-dimensional Printing Technology in Surgery. Agar-based Phantom for Evaluating Targeting of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Systems for Breast Ablation. An Analysis of Radiotherapy Machine Requirements in India: Impact of the Pandemic and Regional Disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1