Evaluating the effect of child home safety training upon three family support practitioner groups: a mixed-methods study.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Perspectives in Public Health Pub Date : 2023-08-12 DOI:10.1177/17579139231185999
M J Taylor, T Patel, E Orton, M C Watson, M Hayes, R Clarke, S Stewart, C Timblin, D Kendrick
{"title":"Evaluating the effect of child home safety training upon three family support practitioner groups: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"M J Taylor,&nbsp;T Patel,&nbsp;E Orton,&nbsp;M C Watson,&nbsp;M Hayes,&nbsp;R Clarke,&nbsp;S Stewart,&nbsp;C Timblin,&nbsp;D Kendrick","doi":"10.1177/17579139231185999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Unintentional injuries in the home contribute substantially to preschool child morbidity and mortality. Practitioners such as health visitors, family mentors and children's centre staff are well-positioned to facilitate child injury prevention by providing home safety advice to families, and training may enhance their ability to do so. We aimed to assess the impact of child home safety training for these practitioners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An explanatory mixed-methods design was used. Practitioners completed questionnaires before, and up to 7 months after, receiving child home safety training and took part in interviews. Seventy-eight health visitors, 72 family mentors and 11 children's centre staff members completed questionnaires. Items were used to calculate scores on home safety knowledge, confidence to provide home safety advice and belief that child home safety promotion is important. Thematic analysis of interviews with seven health visitors and nine family mentors, open-ended responses to the questionnaires and an additional evaluation form was conducted to explore attendees' perceptions of the training and its impact. In addition, seven health visitors and six children's centre staff who had received no training were interviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Knowledge was greater post-training than pre-training across all participants (<i>p</i> < .001). When practitioner groups were analysed separately, there were significant increases in family mentors' knowledge (<i>p</i> < .001) and belief (<i>p</i> = .016), and health visitors' confidence (<i>p</i> = .0036). Qualitative findings indicated that most training session attendees valued the training, believed their practice relating to child home safety had improved as a result, and felt further similar training sessions would be beneficial. Those who had not attended the sessions described a need for more child home safety training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Delivering training to practitioners providing child home safety promotion to families with preschool children can enhance injury prevention knowledge, beliefs and confidence and positively impact on home safety promotion by practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":47256,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579139231185999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Unintentional injuries in the home contribute substantially to preschool child morbidity and mortality. Practitioners such as health visitors, family mentors and children's centre staff are well-positioned to facilitate child injury prevention by providing home safety advice to families, and training may enhance their ability to do so. We aimed to assess the impact of child home safety training for these practitioners.

Methods: An explanatory mixed-methods design was used. Practitioners completed questionnaires before, and up to 7 months after, receiving child home safety training and took part in interviews. Seventy-eight health visitors, 72 family mentors and 11 children's centre staff members completed questionnaires. Items were used to calculate scores on home safety knowledge, confidence to provide home safety advice and belief that child home safety promotion is important. Thematic analysis of interviews with seven health visitors and nine family mentors, open-ended responses to the questionnaires and an additional evaluation form was conducted to explore attendees' perceptions of the training and its impact. In addition, seven health visitors and six children's centre staff who had received no training were interviewed.

Results: Knowledge was greater post-training than pre-training across all participants (p < .001). When practitioner groups were analysed separately, there were significant increases in family mentors' knowledge (p < .001) and belief (p = .016), and health visitors' confidence (p = .0036). Qualitative findings indicated that most training session attendees valued the training, believed their practice relating to child home safety had improved as a result, and felt further similar training sessions would be beneficial. Those who had not attended the sessions described a need for more child home safety training.

Conclusions: Delivering training to practitioners providing child home safety promotion to families with preschool children can enhance injury prevention knowledge, beliefs and confidence and positively impact on home safety promotion by practitioners.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估儿童家庭安全训练对三个家庭支持实践者群体的影响:一项混合方法的研究。
目的:家庭意外伤害是学龄前儿童发病率和死亡率的重要因素。健康视察员、家庭导师和儿童中心工作人员等从业员完全有能力向家庭提供家居安全建议,以促进预防儿童受伤,而培训可提高他们的能力。我们的目的是评估儿童家庭安全培训对这些从业人员的影响。方法:采用解释性混合方法设计。从业员在接受儿童家居安全培训前和培训后7个月内填写问卷,并参加访谈。78名保健访视员、72名家庭导师和11名儿童中心工作人员完成了调查问卷。这些项目被用来计算家庭安全知识、提供家庭安全建议的信心和对促进儿童家庭安全的重要性的信念的得分。对与7名保健访视者和9名家庭导师的访谈、对问卷的开放式答复和一份额外的评估表进行了专题分析,以探讨与会者对培训及其影响的看法。此外,还采访了未接受过培训的7名保健巡视员和6名儿童中心工作人员。结果:所有参与者训练后的知识水平均高于训练前(p < 0.001)。当从业者分组分开分析时,家庭导师的知识(p < .001)和信念(p = .016)和健康访问者的信心(p = .0036)显著增加。定性调查结果显示,大多数参加培训的人都很重视培训,认为他们在儿童家庭安全方面的做法因此有所改善,并认为进一步举办类似的培训将是有益的。那些没有参加培训的人表示需要更多的儿童家庭安全培训。结论:对学龄前儿童家庭儿童家庭安全推广从业人员进行培训,可增强其伤害预防知识、信念和信心,对家庭安全推广从业人员产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Public Health
Perspectives in Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Public Health is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal. It is practice orientated and features current topics and opinions; news and views on current health issues; case studies; book reviews; letters to the Editor; as well as updates on the Society"s work. The journal also commissions articles for themed issues and publishes original peer-reviewed articles. Perspectives in Public Health"s primary aim is to be an invaluable resource for the Society"s members, who are health-promoting professionals from many disciplines, including environmental health, health protection, health and safety, food safety and nutrition, building and engineering, primary care, academia and government.
期刊最新文献
Employers should promote smoking cessation in the workplace. Adolescents' unhealthy snacking behaviour during the school journey and the association with transport modes and food outlets along the school route. A Healthy Conversation Skills intervention to support changes to physical activity and dietary behaviours in community-dwelling older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Middle-Out Perspective: an approach to formalise 'normal practice' in public health advocacy. Perceived stigma among diabetic patients and their caregivers: a review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1