From "content" to "competence": A cross-cultural analysis of pedagogical praxis in a Chinese science lesson.

Q1 Social Sciences Prospects Pub Date : 2023-03-12 DOI:10.1007/s11125-022-09630-9
Mohammad Reza Sarkar Arani, Yimin Gao, Linfeng Wang, Yoshiaki Shibata, Yanling Lin, Hiroyuki Kuno, Toshiya Chichibu
{"title":"From \"content\" to \"competence\": A cross-cultural analysis of pedagogical praxis in a Chinese science lesson.","authors":"Mohammad Reza Sarkar Arani,&nbsp;Yimin Gao,&nbsp;Linfeng Wang,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Shibata,&nbsp;Yanling Lin,&nbsp;Hiroyuki Kuno,&nbsp;Toshiya Chichibu","doi":"10.1007/s11125-022-09630-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This research is based on an approach that looks at cross-cultural research design as a \"lens\" for a deeper understanding of what goes on in the classroom. The research question is how a cross-cultural study like this one can lead to identifying the cultural script of teaching and help educators reflect on their practice. In this context, Chinese lessons could be described as a case-based study of pedagogical reasoning that drives a shift from focusing on \"content\" to \"competence\". This article draws on qualitative data collected by the researchers and a cross-cultural analysis of a science lesson in an elementary school in Beijing, China. Using the Japanese educators' critiques and Chinese reviews, the article determines the cultural script of teaching science (the first research question) and the way Chinese teachers reflect on their practice through the Japanese lens (the second research question). This study exposes the importance of teachers' understanding and reflecting on their practice, <i>technically</i>, <i>practically,</i> and <i>critically</i>. The analysis results show how teachers learn to change their lenses, to reflect on their teaching and reconstruct their understanding about teacher professionalism through at least four basic elements: <i>didactics</i>, <i>praxis</i>, <i>pedagogy</i>, and <i>theory</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35870,"journal":{"name":"Prospects","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10008194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prospects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-022-09630-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is based on an approach that looks at cross-cultural research design as a "lens" for a deeper understanding of what goes on in the classroom. The research question is how a cross-cultural study like this one can lead to identifying the cultural script of teaching and help educators reflect on their practice. In this context, Chinese lessons could be described as a case-based study of pedagogical reasoning that drives a shift from focusing on "content" to "competence". This article draws on qualitative data collected by the researchers and a cross-cultural analysis of a science lesson in an elementary school in Beijing, China. Using the Japanese educators' critiques and Chinese reviews, the article determines the cultural script of teaching science (the first research question) and the way Chinese teachers reflect on their practice through the Japanese lens (the second research question). This study exposes the importance of teachers' understanding and reflecting on their practice, technically, practically, and critically. The analysis results show how teachers learn to change their lenses, to reflect on their teaching and reconstruct their understanding about teacher professionalism through at least four basic elements: didactics, praxis, pedagogy, and theory.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从“内容”到“能力”:中国科学课教学实践的跨文化分析。
这项研究基于一种方法,将跨文化研究设计视为一个“镜头”,以更深入地了解课堂上发生的事情。研究的问题是,像这样的跨文化研究如何能够识别教学的文化脚本,并帮助教育工作者反思他们的实践。在这种背景下,语文课可以被描述为一种基于案例的教学推理研究,它推动了从关注“内容”到“能力”的转变。本文采用了研究人员收集的定性数据,并对中国北京一所小学的科学课进行了跨文化分析。本文运用日本教育家的批评和中国评论,确定了教学科学的文化脚本(第一个研究问题)和中国教师通过日本视角反思实践的方式(第二个研究问题。本研究揭示了教师理解和反思其实践的重要性,包括技术、实践和批判性。分析结果表明,教师如何通过至少四个基本要素:教学论、实践论、教育学和理论,学会改变视角,反思教学,重建对教师专业性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prospects
Prospects Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Prospects provides comparative and international perspectives on key current issues in curriculum, learning, and assessment. The principal features of the journal are the innovative and critical insights it offers into the equitable provision of quality and relevant education for all; and the cross-disciplinary perspectives it engages, drawing on a range of domains that include culture, development, economics, ethics, gender, inclusion, politics, sociology, sustainability, and education. Prospects aims to influence a wide range of actors in the field of education and development, whether academics, policy-makers, curriculum-developers, assessors, teachers or students. Unlike other journals in the field, which deal only with theoretical or research-related aspects, Prospects also focuses on policy implementation and aims at improving the extent and effectiveness of communication between theorists and researchers, on one side, and policy makers and practitioners, on the other. The journal thus welcomes innovative empirical research, case studies of policy and practice, conceptual analyses and policy evaluations, as well as critical analyses of published research and existing policy. Founded in 1970 and published in English by Springer, Prospects is among the most well-established journals in the field. Editions in Arabic and Mandarin Chinese are available as well. The journal is edited by the International Bureau of Education (IBE), in Geneva. A leading UNESCO Institute and a global center of excellence in curriculum and related matters, the IBE is recognized and valued for the specialist knowledge and expertise that it brings to Member States, promoting new shared global understanding of curriculum, teaching, learning, and assessment.
期刊最新文献
School choice in rural Odisha, India: Understanding from a multi-stakeholder perspective Satisfaction of university graduates: What does it tell us? Responding to the invitation: Renewing the social contract for education Orienting practical global citizenship education in an International Baccalaureate international school Envisioning a new model of network governance for global education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1