How Great a Risk Do You Take? A Qualitative Study Exploring Attitudes of Individuals with Friedreich Ataxia Toward Gene Therapy.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Human gene therapy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1089/hum.2023.088
Katherine Lieschke, Varlli Scott, Martin B Delatycki, Sharon Lewis, Megan Munsie, Claire Tanner, Louise A Corben
{"title":"How Great a Risk Do You Take? A Qualitative Study Exploring Attitudes of Individuals with Friedreich Ataxia Toward Gene Therapy.","authors":"Katherine Lieschke,&nbsp;Varlli Scott,&nbsp;Martin B Delatycki,&nbsp;Sharon Lewis,&nbsp;Megan Munsie,&nbsp;Claire Tanner,&nbsp;Louise A Corben","doi":"10.1089/hum.2023.088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientists and pharmaceutical companies are working toward delivering gene therapy (GT) for Friedreich ataxia (FRDA). Understanding the views of people with lived experience of FRDA and their parents toward GT is essential to inform trial design and identify potential barriers to participation in clinical trials. The goals of this study were to identify the attitudes toward GT held by individuals with FRDA and parents of individuals with FRDA, and to explore how these may impact future trials for this condition. Audiorecorded, semistructured, qualitative interviews with 19 Australians explored experiences of FRDA, knowledge about clinical trials, views on GT, including risks and benefits, and potential barriers to participation in trials. Participants included thirteen individuals living with FRDA aged between 15-43 years, and six parents of children with FRDA aged 4-12 years of age. Thematic analysis of the interviews identified six main themes. Findings from this study indicate there is strong desire for information regarding GT in FRDA, however the current level of uncertainty around GT makes decision making challenging. The desire to maintain functional status and avoid additional risk of deterioration from an investigational treatment was apparent. Importantly, neurological targets were identified as preferred for GT trials. Further research is required to identify if attitudes and perceptions differ according to geographical location and disease stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":13007,"journal":{"name":"Human gene therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human gene therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/hum.2023.088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientists and pharmaceutical companies are working toward delivering gene therapy (GT) for Friedreich ataxia (FRDA). Understanding the views of people with lived experience of FRDA and their parents toward GT is essential to inform trial design and identify potential barriers to participation in clinical trials. The goals of this study were to identify the attitudes toward GT held by individuals with FRDA and parents of individuals with FRDA, and to explore how these may impact future trials for this condition. Audiorecorded, semistructured, qualitative interviews with 19 Australians explored experiences of FRDA, knowledge about clinical trials, views on GT, including risks and benefits, and potential barriers to participation in trials. Participants included thirteen individuals living with FRDA aged between 15-43 years, and six parents of children with FRDA aged 4-12 years of age. Thematic analysis of the interviews identified six main themes. Findings from this study indicate there is strong desire for information regarding GT in FRDA, however the current level of uncertainty around GT makes decision making challenging. The desire to maintain functional status and avoid additional risk of deterioration from an investigational treatment was apparent. Importantly, neurological targets were identified as preferred for GT trials. Further research is required to identify if attitudes and perceptions differ according to geographical location and disease stage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你的风险有多大?弗里德里希共济失调患者对基因治疗态度的定性研究。
科学家和制药公司正在致力于为弗里德里希共济失调(FRDA)提供基因治疗(GT)。了解有FRDA生活经历的人及其父母对GT的看法对于为试验设计提供信息和确定参与临床试验的潜在障碍至关重要。本研究的目的是确定FRDA患者和FRDA患者父母对GT的态度,并探讨这些态度如何影响未来对这种情况的试验。对19名澳大利亚人进行的录音、半结构、定性访谈探讨了FRDA的经验、临床试验知识、对GT的看法,包括风险和益处,以及参与试验的潜在障碍。参与者包括13名15-43岁的FRDA患者和6名4-12岁FRDA儿童的父母。对访谈的专题分析确定了六个主要主题。这项研究的结果表明,FRDA强烈希望获得有关GT的信息,但当前GT的不确定性水平使决策具有挑战性。维持功能状态并避免研究性治疗带来的额外恶化风险的愿望是显而易见的。重要的是,神经靶点被确定为GT试验的首选靶点。需要进一步研究,以确定态度和看法是否因地理位置和疾病阶段而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human gene therapy
Human gene therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Gene Therapy is the premier, multidisciplinary journal covering all aspects of gene therapy. The Journal publishes in-depth coverage of DNA, RNA, and cell therapies by delivering the latest breakthroughs in research and technologies. Human Gene Therapy provides a central forum for scientific and clinical information, including ethical, legal, regulatory, social, and commercial issues, which enables the advancement and progress of therapeutic procedures leading to improved patient outcomes, and ultimately, to curing diseases.
期刊最新文献
Neuroimaging Applications for the Delivery and Monitoring of Gene Therapy for Central Nervous System Diseases. Cyclosporin H Improves the Transduction of CD34+ Cells with an Anti-Sickling Globin Vector, a Possible Therapeutic Approach for Sickle Cell Disease. Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Transfer Ameliorates Progression of Skeletal Lesions in Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA Mice. Lentiviral Vector-Mediated Ex Vivo Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gene Therapy for Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA Murine Model. Suppression of CNS APOE4 Expression by miRNAs Delivered by the S2 AAVrh.10 Capsid-Modified AAV Vector.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1