The Utility of Arterial Transit Time Measurement for Evaluating the Hemodynamic Perfusion State of Patients with Chronic Cerebrovascular Stenosis or Occlusive Disease: Correlative Study between MR Imaging and 15O-labeled H2O Positron Emission Tomography.
{"title":"The Utility of Arterial Transit Time Measurement for Evaluating the Hemodynamic Perfusion State of Patients with Chronic Cerebrovascular Stenosis or Occlusive Disease: Correlative Study between MR Imaging and <sup>15</sup>O-labeled H<sub>2</sub>O Positron Emission Tomography.","authors":"Kayo Takeuchi, Makoto Isozaki, Yoshifumi Higashino, Nobuyuki Kosaka, Ken-Ichiro Kikuta, Shota Ishida, Masayuki Kanamoto, Naoyuki Takei, Hidehiko Okazawa, Hirohiko Kimura","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2020-0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To verify whether arterial transit time (ATT) mapping can correct arterial spin labeling-cerebral blood flow (ASL-CBF) values and to verify whether ATT is a parameter that correlates with positron emission tomography (PET)-oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) and PET-mean transit time (MTT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven patients with unilateral major cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion underwent MRI and PET in the chronic or asymptomatic phase. ASL-MRI acquisitions were conducted with each of two post-label delay (PLD) settings (0.7s and 2.0s) using a pseudo-continuous ASL pulse sequence and 3D-spin echo spiral readout with vascular crusher gradient. ATT maps were obtained using a low-resolution pre-scan approach with five PLD settings. Using the ASL perfusion images and ATT mapping, ATT-corrected ASL-CBF images were obtained. Four kinds of ASL-CBF methods (PLD 0.7s with or without ATT correction and PLD 2.0s with or without ATT correction) were compared to PET-CBF, using vascular territory ROIs. ATT and OEF were compared for all ROIs, unaffected side ROIs, and affected side ROIs, respectively. ATT and MTT were compared by the ratio of the affected side to the unaffected side. Transit time-based ROIs were used for the comparison with ATT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing ASL-CBF and PET-CBF, the correlation was higher with ATT correction than without correction, and for a PLD of 2.0s compared with 0.7s. The best correlation was for PLD of 2.0s with ATT correction (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.547). ROIs on the affected side showed a low but significant correlation between ATT and PET-OEF (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.141). There was a low correlation between the ATT ratio and the MTT ratio (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.133).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Low-resolution ATT correction may increase the accuracy of ASL-CBF measurements in patients with unilateral major cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion. In addition, ATT itself might have a potential role in detecting compromised hemodynamic state.</p>","PeriodicalId":18119,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","volume":"22 3","pages":"289-300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/65/db/mrms-22-289.PMC10449557.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2020-0123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To verify whether arterial transit time (ATT) mapping can correct arterial spin labeling-cerebral blood flow (ASL-CBF) values and to verify whether ATT is a parameter that correlates with positron emission tomography (PET)-oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) and PET-mean transit time (MTT).
Methods: Eleven patients with unilateral major cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion underwent MRI and PET in the chronic or asymptomatic phase. ASL-MRI acquisitions were conducted with each of two post-label delay (PLD) settings (0.7s and 2.0s) using a pseudo-continuous ASL pulse sequence and 3D-spin echo spiral readout with vascular crusher gradient. ATT maps were obtained using a low-resolution pre-scan approach with five PLD settings. Using the ASL perfusion images and ATT mapping, ATT-corrected ASL-CBF images were obtained. Four kinds of ASL-CBF methods (PLD 0.7s with or without ATT correction and PLD 2.0s with or without ATT correction) were compared to PET-CBF, using vascular territory ROIs. ATT and OEF were compared for all ROIs, unaffected side ROIs, and affected side ROIs, respectively. ATT and MTT were compared by the ratio of the affected side to the unaffected side. Transit time-based ROIs were used for the comparison with ATT.
Results: Comparing ASL-CBF and PET-CBF, the correlation was higher with ATT correction than without correction, and for a PLD of 2.0s compared with 0.7s. The best correlation was for PLD of 2.0s with ATT correction (R2 = 0.547). ROIs on the affected side showed a low but significant correlation between ATT and PET-OEF (R2 = 0.141). There was a low correlation between the ATT ratio and the MTT ratio (R2 = 0.133).
Conclusion: Low-resolution ATT correction may increase the accuracy of ASL-CBF measurements in patients with unilateral major cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion. In addition, ATT itself might have a potential role in detecting compromised hemodynamic state.
目的:验证动脉转运时间(ATT)映射是否能纠正动脉自旋标记-脑血流(ASL-CBF)值,并验证ATT是否是与正电子发射断层扫描(PET)-氧萃取分数(OEF)和PET-平均转运时间(MTT)相关的参数:方法:11 名单侧大脑大动脉狭窄或闭塞患者在慢性期或无症状期接受了 MRI 和 PET 检查。使用伪连续 ASL 脉冲序列和带血管破碎梯度的三维自旋回波螺旋读出,在两种标签后延迟(PLD)设置(0.7 秒和 2.0 秒)下分别进行 ASL-MRI 采集。采用低分辨率预扫描方法和五种 PLD 设置获得 ATT 图。利用 ASL 灌注图像和 ATT 图谱,获得 ATT 校正的 ASL-CBF 图像。使用血管区域 ROI 将四种 ASL-CBF 方法(PLD 0.7s,带或不带 ATT 校正;PLD 2.0s,带或不带 ATT 校正)与 PET-CBF 进行了比较。分别比较了所有 ROI、未受影响侧 ROI 和受影响侧 ROI 的 ATT 和 OEF。ATT 和 MTT 通过受影响侧与未受影响侧的比率进行比较。基于转运时间的 ROI 用于与 ATT 进行比较:结果:比较 ASL-CBF 和 PET-CBF,ATT 校正后的相关性高于未进行校正的相关性,PLD 为 2.0s 时的相关性高于 0.7s 时的相关性。相关性最好的是经 ATT 校正的 2.0 秒 PLD(R2 = 0.547)。患侧的 ROI 显示 ATT 与 PET-OEF 之间的相关性较低但很显著(R2 = 0.141)。ATT比率与MTT比率之间的相关性较低(R2 = 0.133):结论:低分辨率 ATT 校正可提高单侧大脑大动脉狭窄或闭塞患者 ASL-CBF 测量的准确性。结论:低分辨率 ATT 校正可提高单侧大脑大动脉狭窄或闭塞患者 ASL-CBF 测量的准确性,此外,ATT 本身可能在检测受损的血流动力学状态方面发挥潜在作用。
期刊介绍:
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences (MRMS or Magn
Reson Med Sci) is an international journal pursuing the
publication of original articles contributing to the progress
of magnetic resonance in the field of biomedical sciences
including technical developments and clinical applications.
MRMS is an official journal of the Japanese Society for
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (JSMRM).