Lower Limb Asymmetry Evaluation Using the Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) Single Leg Stance Protocol.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Motor Behavior Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00222895.2022.2163222
Michael R Nolff, Nathan O Conner, Joshua L Haworth, Daniel J Goble
{"title":"Lower Limb Asymmetry Evaluation Using the Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) Single Leg Stance Protocol.","authors":"Michael R Nolff,&nbsp;Nathan O Conner,&nbsp;Joshua L Haworth,&nbsp;Daniel J Goble","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2022.2163222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single Leg Stance (SLS) balance testing is a common means of determining lower limb asymmetries in motor behavior. The Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) Balance Plate is a low-cost, portable force plate for objectively obtaining balance measurements. The present study provides the first known balance results for the BTrackS SLS protocol. BTrackS SLS testing was conducted on 161 young adults (90 women, 71 men) according to the test's standardized instructions. Specifically, participants performed one-legged (left or right) stance on the BTrackS Balance Plate for four, (2 practice, 2 actual) 20 s trials. SLS test outputs included total Center of Pressure path length and absolute symmetry index. Results showed that women had better SLS performance than men and that both sexes performed better on the actual compared to practice trial. Systematic one-sample t-tests of the Absolute Symmetry Index measures showed that a difference of 16% or greater between legs represented asymmetric performance. These results have clear value for individuals using BTrackS SLS testing to evaluate potential asymmetries. Additionally, these findings agree with previous reports showing sex differences favoring women on tests of static balance, and validate the use of a practice trial in the BTrackS SLS protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":"55 5","pages":"493-498"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2022.2163222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Single Leg Stance (SLS) balance testing is a common means of determining lower limb asymmetries in motor behavior. The Balance Tracking System (BTrackS) Balance Plate is a low-cost, portable force plate for objectively obtaining balance measurements. The present study provides the first known balance results for the BTrackS SLS protocol. BTrackS SLS testing was conducted on 161 young adults (90 women, 71 men) according to the test's standardized instructions. Specifically, participants performed one-legged (left or right) stance on the BTrackS Balance Plate for four, (2 practice, 2 actual) 20 s trials. SLS test outputs included total Center of Pressure path length and absolute symmetry index. Results showed that women had better SLS performance than men and that both sexes performed better on the actual compared to practice trial. Systematic one-sample t-tests of the Absolute Symmetry Index measures showed that a difference of 16% or greater between legs represented asymmetric performance. These results have clear value for individuals using BTrackS SLS testing to evaluate potential asymmetries. Additionally, these findings agree with previous reports showing sex differences favoring women on tests of static balance, and validate the use of a practice trial in the BTrackS SLS protocol.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用平衡跟踪系统(BTrackS)单腿站立协议评估下肢不对称。
单腿站立(SLS)平衡测试是确定下肢运动行为不对称的常用手段。平衡跟踪系统(BTrackS)平衡板是一种低成本,便携式力板,用于客观地获得平衡测量。本研究为BTrackS SLS协议提供了第一个已知的平衡结果。根据测试的标准化说明,对161名年轻人(90名女性,71名男性)进行了BTrackS SLS测试。具体来说,参与者在BTrackS平衡板上单腿(左或右)站立4次,(2次练习,2次实际)20秒试验。SLS试验输出包括压力中心路径总长度和绝对对称指数。结果表明,女性在SLS测试中的表现优于男性,且男女在实际测试中的表现均优于模拟测试。绝对对称指数测量的系统单样本t检验表明,两条腿之间的差异为16%或更大代表不对称的表现。这些结果对于使用BTrackS SLS测试来评估潜在不对称的个体具有明确的价值。此外,这些发现与先前的报告一致,表明性别差异在静态平衡测试中有利于女性,并验证了在BTrackS SLS方案中使用实践试验的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Limb-Target Control Increases With Effective Index of Difficulty. Control Mechanisms of Sensorimotor System on Manipulation of Proprioceptive Inputs During Balance Maintenance. Guiding the Hand to an Invisible Target. Auditory Cues and Feedback in the Serial Reaction Time Task: Evidence for Sequence Acquisition and Sensory Transfer. Effects of External Pacing Type on the Cross-Education of Motor Skill.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1