Pressure injury prevention in adult critically ill patients: best practice implementation project.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000352
Aline de Oliveira Ramalho, Leidiane Moreira Santiago, Luciana Meira, Alessandra Marin, Larissa Bertacchini de Oliveira, Vilanice Alves de Araújo Püschel
{"title":"Pressure injury prevention in adult critically ill patients: best practice implementation project.","authors":"Aline de Oliveira Ramalho,&nbsp;Leidiane Moreira Santiago,&nbsp;Luciana Meira,&nbsp;Alessandra Marin,&nbsp;Larissa Bertacchini de Oliveira,&nbsp;Vilanice Alves de Araújo Püschel","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed compliance with the best practices for pressure injury prevention among ICU patients at a tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intensive care patients are at high risk of developing a pressure injury; preventing this requires a best practice protocol.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This best practice implementation project was conducted in a Brazilian tertiary hospital in three phases following the JBI Model of Evidence-based Healthcare. Ten criteria derived from the best available evidence were audited and monitored before and after best practice implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline and follow-up audits evaluated 28 patients at each step. A total of 448 h of care were analyzed using a monitoring camera and medical records. Compliance with all 10 audited criteria increased, with a 50% reduction in the prevalence of pressure injuries in intensive care. Of the 223 employees, 71% claimed to have some knowledge of pressure injury prevention, and 66% reported adequate adherence to prevention protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The audit and feedback strategy improved compliance with the criteria. Future audits are needed to promote the sustainability of evidence-based practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":"21 3","pages":"218-228"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000352","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed compliance with the best practices for pressure injury prevention among ICU patients at a tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.

Introduction: Intensive care patients are at high risk of developing a pressure injury; preventing this requires a best practice protocol.

Method: This best practice implementation project was conducted in a Brazilian tertiary hospital in three phases following the JBI Model of Evidence-based Healthcare. Ten criteria derived from the best available evidence were audited and monitored before and after best practice implementation.

Results: The baseline and follow-up audits evaluated 28 patients at each step. A total of 448 h of care were analyzed using a monitoring camera and medical records. Compliance with all 10 audited criteria increased, with a 50% reduction in the prevalence of pressure injuries in intensive care. Of the 223 employees, 71% claimed to have some knowledge of pressure injury prevention, and 66% reported adequate adherence to prevention protocols.

Conclusion: The audit and feedback strategy improved compliance with the criteria. Future audits are needed to promote the sustainability of evidence-based practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人危重病人压伤预防:最佳实践实施项目。
目的:本研究评估了巴西圣保罗一家三级医院ICU患者对压力损伤预防最佳实践的依从性。重症监护患者是发生压力性损伤的高危人群;防止这种情况需要一个最佳实践协议。方法:本最佳实践实施项目在巴西一家三级医院按照JBI循证医疗模式分三个阶段进行。在实施最佳做法之前和之后,对从现有最佳证据得出的10项标准进行了审计和监测。结果:基线和随访审计在每个步骤评估28例患者。使用监控摄像机和医疗记录分析了总共448小时的护理。所有10项审计标准的符合性都有所提高,重症监护中压力伤害的发生率降低了50%。在223名员工中,71%的人声称对压力伤害预防有一定的了解,66%的人表示充分遵守了预防协议。结论:审核反馈策略提高了对准则的遵从性。未来需要进行审计,以促进循证实践的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Nutrition as therapy - the role of dietitian counseling: a best practice implementation project. Pain assessment and management in patients with dementia in Taiwan: a best practice implementation project. Comparison of two audit and feedback approaches: descriptive analysis of personal and contextual dynamics. Collaborative implementation science: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example. Improving communication among nursing staff at a children's hospital in the southern United States: a best practice implementation project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1