Digitization and validation of the open bite checklist manifesto: a step toward artificial intelligence.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Angle Orthodontist Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2319/032923-225.1
Heba E Akl, Yehya A Mostafa
{"title":"Digitization and validation of the open bite checklist manifesto: a step toward artificial intelligence.","authors":"Heba E Akl, Yehya A Mostafa","doi":"10.2319/032923-225.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To introduce and validate newly designed computer software to aid in the diagnosis of anterior open bite (AOB).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The software was constructed based on the algorithm of a standardized open bite checklist, which considered skeletal, dental, and soft tissue components, as well as smile characteristics. Feeding the software with this input yielded a digital form output (DFO) in the guise of a diagnostic report characterizing the AOB phenotype, contributing components, severity, associated problems, and functional factors. For validation, DFO was compared to a conventional form output (CFO), created in a standardized manner according to expert opinions. Agreement between the DFO and CFO in terms of AOB phenotype was the primary outcome, while the secondary outcome was the number of missing diagnostic components in either method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Percentage of agreement between CFO and DFO was 82.2%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.78, which is considered a good level of agreement. There was a statistically significant relationship between the number of missing diagnostic components in CFO and level of disagreement, which rendered the DFO more reliable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Newly constructed software represents an efficient and valid diagnostic tool for AOB and its contributing components. There was good agreement between CFO and DFO, with the latter being more comprehensive and reliable. The algorithm built in the software can be used as the basis for a future artificial intelligence model to aid in the diagnosis of AOB.</p>","PeriodicalId":50790,"journal":{"name":"Angle Orthodontist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10928946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angle Orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/032923-225.1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To introduce and validate newly designed computer software to aid in the diagnosis of anterior open bite (AOB).

Materials and methods: The software was constructed based on the algorithm of a standardized open bite checklist, which considered skeletal, dental, and soft tissue components, as well as smile characteristics. Feeding the software with this input yielded a digital form output (DFO) in the guise of a diagnostic report characterizing the AOB phenotype, contributing components, severity, associated problems, and functional factors. For validation, DFO was compared to a conventional form output (CFO), created in a standardized manner according to expert opinions. Agreement between the DFO and CFO in terms of AOB phenotype was the primary outcome, while the secondary outcome was the number of missing diagnostic components in either method.

Results: Percentage of agreement between CFO and DFO was 82.2%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.78, which is considered a good level of agreement. There was a statistically significant relationship between the number of missing diagnostic components in CFO and level of disagreement, which rendered the DFO more reliable.

Conclusions: Newly constructed software represents an efficient and valid diagnostic tool for AOB and its contributing components. There was good agreement between CFO and DFO, with the latter being more comprehensive and reliable. The algorithm built in the software can be used as the basis for a future artificial intelligence model to aid in the diagnosis of AOB.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开放式咬合检查单宣言的数字化和验证:向人工智能迈出的一步。
目的:介绍并验证新设计的辅助诊断前牙开合咬合(AOB)的计算机软件:介绍并验证新设计的辅助诊断前牙开合咬合(AOB)的计算机软件:该软件是根据标准开合咬合检查表的算法设计的,其中考虑了骨骼、牙齿和软组织成分以及微笑特征。将这些输入信息输入软件后,软件会以诊断报告的形式输出数字表格(DFO),该报告描述了AOB的表型、致病因素、严重程度、相关问题和功能因素。为了进行验证,将 DFO 与根据专家意见以标准化方式创建的传统表格输出(CFO)进行了比较。主要结果是 DFO 和 CFO 在 AOB 表型方面的一致性,次要结果是两种方法中诊断成分缺失的数量:结果:CFO 和 DFO 的一致率为 82.2%,卡帕系数为 0.78,达到了良好的一致水平。CFO中缺失诊断成分的数量与不一致程度之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系,这使得DFO更为可靠:结论:新开发的软件是一种高效、有效的 AOB 诊断工具。CFO和DFO之间的一致性很好,后者更全面、更可靠。软件中构建的算法可作为未来人工智能模型的基础,帮助诊断 AOB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Angle Orthodontist
Angle Orthodontist 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
95
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Angle Orthodontist is the official publication of the Edward H. Angle Society of Orthodontists and is published bimonthly in January, March, May, July, September and November by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation Inc. The Angle Orthodontist is the only major journal in orthodontics with a non-commercial, non-profit publisher -- The E. H. Angle Education and Research Foundation. We value our freedom to operate exclusively in the best interests of our readers and authors. Our website www.angle.org is completely free and open to all visitors.
期刊最新文献
Does clinical experience affect the bracket bonding accuracy of guided bonding devices in vitro? Digitization and validation of the open bite checklist manifesto: a step toward artificial intelligence. The effect of vertical skeletal proportions on overbite changes in untreated adolescents: a longitudinal evaluation. Predicted overbite and overjet changes with the Invisalign appliance: a validation study. Responsiveness of three measurements in cone-beam computed tomography transverse analyses during both tooth-supported and mini-screw-assisted rapid maxillary expansion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1