Effect of Temporal Sampling Rate on Estimates of the Perfusion Parameters for Patients with Moyamoya Disease Assessed with Simultaneous Multislice Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0162
Tomohiro Takamura, Shoko Hara, Tadashi Nariai, Yutaka Ikenouchi, Michimasa Suzuki, Toshiaki Taoka, Masahiro Ida, Keiichi Ishigame, Masaaki Hori, Kanako Sato, Koji Kamagata, Kanako Kumamaru, Hidenori Oishi, Sho Okamoto, Yoshio Araki, Kenji Uda, Masakazu Miyajima, Taketoshi Maehara, Motoki Inaji, Yoji Tanaka, Shinji Naganawa, Hisashi Kawai, Toshiki Nakane, Yasuaki Tsurushima, Toshiyuki Onodera, Shuko Nojiri, Shigeki Aoki
{"title":"Effect of Temporal Sampling Rate on Estimates of the Perfusion Parameters for Patients with Moyamoya Disease Assessed with Simultaneous Multislice Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging.","authors":"Tomohiro Takamura,&nbsp;Shoko Hara,&nbsp;Tadashi Nariai,&nbsp;Yutaka Ikenouchi,&nbsp;Michimasa Suzuki,&nbsp;Toshiaki Taoka,&nbsp;Masahiro Ida,&nbsp;Keiichi Ishigame,&nbsp;Masaaki Hori,&nbsp;Kanako Sato,&nbsp;Koji Kamagata,&nbsp;Kanako Kumamaru,&nbsp;Hidenori Oishi,&nbsp;Sho Okamoto,&nbsp;Yoshio Araki,&nbsp;Kenji Uda,&nbsp;Masakazu Miyajima,&nbsp;Taketoshi Maehara,&nbsp;Motoki Inaji,&nbsp;Yoji Tanaka,&nbsp;Shinji Naganawa,&nbsp;Hisashi Kawai,&nbsp;Toshiki Nakane,&nbsp;Yasuaki Tsurushima,&nbsp;Toshiyuki Onodera,&nbsp;Shuko Nojiri,&nbsp;Shigeki Aoki","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The effect of temporal sampling rate (TSR) on perfusion parameters has not been fully investigated in Moyamoya disease (MMD); therefore, this study evaluated the influence of different TSRs on perfusion parameters quantitatively and qualitatively by applying simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DSC-MRI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DSC-MRI datasets were acquired from 28 patients with MMD with a TSR of 0.5 s. Cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), mean transit time (MTT), time to peak (TTP), and time to maximum tissue residue function (Tmax) were calculated for eight TSRs ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 s in 0.5-s increments that were subsampled from a TSR of 0.5 s datasets. Perfusion measurements and volume for chronic ischemic (Tmax ≥ 2 s) and non-ischemic (Tmax < 2 s) areas for each TSR were compared to measurements with a TSR of 0.5 s, as was visual perfusion map analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CBF, CBV, and Tmax values tended to be underestimated, whereas MTT and TTP values were less influenced, with a longer TSR. Although Tmax values were overestimated in the TSR of 1.0 s in non-ischemic areas, differences in perfusion measurements between the TSRs of 0.5 and 1.0 s were generally minimal. The volumes of the chronic ischemic areas with a TSR ≥ 3.0 s were significantly underestimated. In CBF and CBV maps, no significant deterioration was noted in image quality up to 3.0 and 2.5 s, respectively. The image quality of MTT, TTP, and Tmax maps for the TSR of 1.0 s was similar to that for the TSR of 0.5 s but was significantly deteriorated for the TSRs of ≥ 1.5 s.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the assessment of MMD by SMS DSC-MRI, application of TSRs of ≥ 1.5 s may lead to deterioration of the perfusion measurements; however, that was less influenced in TSRs of ≤ 1.0 s.</p>","PeriodicalId":18119,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","volume":"22 3","pages":"301-312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5a/1b/mrms-22-301.PMC10449549.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The effect of temporal sampling rate (TSR) on perfusion parameters has not been fully investigated in Moyamoya disease (MMD); therefore, this study evaluated the influence of different TSRs on perfusion parameters quantitatively and qualitatively by applying simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DSC-MRI).

Methods: DSC-MRI datasets were acquired from 28 patients with MMD with a TSR of 0.5 s. Cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), mean transit time (MTT), time to peak (TTP), and time to maximum tissue residue function (Tmax) were calculated for eight TSRs ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 s in 0.5-s increments that were subsampled from a TSR of 0.5 s datasets. Perfusion measurements and volume for chronic ischemic (Tmax ≥ 2 s) and non-ischemic (Tmax < 2 s) areas for each TSR were compared to measurements with a TSR of 0.5 s, as was visual perfusion map analysis.

Results: CBF, CBV, and Tmax values tended to be underestimated, whereas MTT and TTP values were less influenced, with a longer TSR. Although Tmax values were overestimated in the TSR of 1.0 s in non-ischemic areas, differences in perfusion measurements between the TSRs of 0.5 and 1.0 s were generally minimal. The volumes of the chronic ischemic areas with a TSR ≥ 3.0 s were significantly underestimated. In CBF and CBV maps, no significant deterioration was noted in image quality up to 3.0 and 2.5 s, respectively. The image quality of MTT, TTP, and Tmax maps for the TSR of 1.0 s was similar to that for the TSR of 0.5 s but was significantly deteriorated for the TSRs of ≥ 1.5 s.

Conclusion: In the assessment of MMD by SMS DSC-MRI, application of TSRs of ≥ 1.5 s may lead to deterioration of the perfusion measurements; however, that was less influenced in TSRs of ≤ 1.0 s.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同时多层动态敏感性增强磁共振成像评估时间采样率对烟雾病患者灌注参数估计的影响
目的:暂时采样率(TSR)对烟雾病(MMD)灌注参数的影响尚未得到充分研究;因此,本研究采用同步多层(SMS)动态敏感性对比增强磁共振成像(DSC-MRI)定量和定性地评估不同TSRs对灌注参数的影响。方法:对28例TSR为0.5 s的烟雾病患者进行DSC-MRI数据采集。从一个TSR为0.5 s的数据集中,以0.5 s的增量对8个TSR(范围为0.5 ~ 4.0 s)进行次采样,计算脑血流量(CBF)、脑血容量(CBV)、平均传输时间(MTT)、到达峰值时间(TTP)和到达最大组织残留功能时间(Tmax)。将每次TSR的慢性缺血(Tmax≥2 s)和非缺血(Tmax < 2 s)区域的灌注测量和体积与TSR为0.5 s的测量结果进行比较,并进行视觉灌注图分析。结果:CBF、CBV和Tmax值倾向于被低估,而MTT和TTP值受影响较小,TSR较长。虽然在非缺血区域TSR为1.0 s时Tmax值被高估,但TSR为0.5 s和1.0 s时灌注测量的差异通常很小。TSR≥3.0 s的慢性缺血区体积被明显低估。在CBF和CBV图中,分别在3.0秒和2.5秒内图像质量没有明显下降。当TSR为1.0 s时,MTT、TTP和Tmax地图的图像质量与TSR为0.5 s时的图像质量相似,但当TSR≥1.5 s时,图像质量明显恶化。结论:SMS DSC-MRI评估MMD时,TSRs≥1.5 s可能导致灌注测量恶化;但在tsr≤1.0 s时,影响较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences (MRMS or Magn Reson Med Sci) is an international journal pursuing the publication of original articles contributing to the progress of magnetic resonance in the field of biomedical sciences including technical developments and clinical applications. MRMS is an official journal of the Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (JSMRM).
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Biliary Malignancy with Measured and Calculated Ultra-high b-value Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging at 3T. Diagnostic Utility of an Adjusted DWI Lexicon Using Multiple b-values to Evaluate Breast Lesions in Combination with BI-RADS. Blockage of CSF Outflow in Rats after Deep Cervical Lymph Node Ligation Observed Using Gd-based MR Imaging. A Versatile MR Elastography Research Tool with a Modified Motion Signal-to-noise Ratio Approach. Comparison of Slab and Pencil Beam Labeling in Spin-labeled MR Imaging for Pancreatic Juice Flow Visualization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1