{"title":"Bias and constructive processes in a self-memory system.","authors":"Daniel L Schacter, Ciara M Greene, Gillian Murphy","doi":"10.1080/09658211.2023.2232568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Martin Conway's influential theorising about the self-memory system (Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. <i>Psychological Review</i>, <i>107</i>(2), 261-288) illuminated how the \"working self\" influences the construction of autobiographical memories. Moreover, his constructive view of self and memory is compatible with the occurrence of various kinds of errors and distortions in remembering. Here we consider one of the \"seven sins\" of memory (Schacter, D. L. (2021). <i>The seven sins of memory updated edition: How the mind forgets and remembers</i>. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt) that we believe is most closely related to the operation of Conway's self-memory system: bias, which refers to the role of current knowledge, beliefs, and feelings in shaping and sometimes distorting memories for past experiences and attitudes. More specifically, we discuss recent research on three forms of bias - consistency, self-enhancing, and positivity biases - that illuminate their role in influencing how people remember the past and also imagine the future. We consider both theoretical and applied aspects of these biases and, consistent with Conway's perspective, argue that despite sometimes contributing to inaccuracies, bias also serves adaptive functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18569,"journal":{"name":"Memory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10770298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2232568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Martin Conway's influential theorising about the self-memory system (Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107(2), 261-288) illuminated how the "working self" influences the construction of autobiographical memories. Moreover, his constructive view of self and memory is compatible with the occurrence of various kinds of errors and distortions in remembering. Here we consider one of the "seven sins" of memory (Schacter, D. L. (2021). The seven sins of memory updated edition: How the mind forgets and remembers. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt) that we believe is most closely related to the operation of Conway's self-memory system: bias, which refers to the role of current knowledge, beliefs, and feelings in shaping and sometimes distorting memories for past experiences and attitudes. More specifically, we discuss recent research on three forms of bias - consistency, self-enhancing, and positivity biases - that illuminate their role in influencing how people remember the past and also imagine the future. We consider both theoretical and applied aspects of these biases and, consistent with Conway's perspective, argue that despite sometimes contributing to inaccuracies, bias also serves adaptive functions.
马丁-康威(Martin Conway)关于自我记忆系统的理论影响深远(Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000)。自我记忆系统中自传体记忆的构建》。心理学评论》,107(2),261-288)阐明了 "工作中的自我 "如何影响自传体记忆的构建。此外,他关于自我和记忆的建构性观点与记忆中出现的各种错误和歪曲是一致的。在此,我们考虑记忆 "七宗罪 "之一 Schacter, D. L. (2021).记忆的七宗罪》更新版:思维如何遗忘和记忆》。我们认为这与康威的自我记忆系统的运作关系最为密切:偏差,指的是当前的知识、信念和情感在塑造,有时甚至扭曲对过去经历和态度的记忆方面所起的作用。更具体地说,我们讨论了最近关于三种形式的偏见--一致性偏见、自我强化偏见和积极性偏见--的研究,这些研究阐明了它们在影响人们如何记忆过去和想象未来方面所起的作用。我们考虑了这些偏见的理论和应用方面,并与康威的观点一致,认为偏见尽管有时会导致不准确,但也具有适应功能。
期刊介绍:
Memory publishes high quality papers in all areas of memory research. This includes experimental studies of memory (including laboratory-based research, everyday memory studies, and applied memory research), developmental, educational, neuropsychological, clinical and social research on memory. By representing all significant areas of memory research, the journal cuts across the traditional distinctions of psychological research. Memory therefore provides a unique venue for memory researchers to communicate their findings and ideas both to peers within their own research tradition in the study of memory, and also to the wider range of research communities with direct interest in human memory.