The increased anterior talofibular ligament-posterior talofibular ligament angle on MRI may help evaluate chronic ankle instability.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1007/s00276-023-03196-7
Lei Zhang, Ting Lan, Junyao Chen, Zidong Wei, Houyin Shi, Guoyou Wang
{"title":"The increased anterior talofibular ligament-posterior talofibular ligament angle on MRI may help evaluate chronic ankle instability.","authors":"Lei Zhang,&nbsp;Ting Lan,&nbsp;Junyao Chen,&nbsp;Zidong Wei,&nbsp;Houyin Shi,&nbsp;Guoyou Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00276-023-03196-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study intended to compare the difference between the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) and posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL) angle with chronic ankle instability (CAI) patients and healthy volunteers, and to confirm whether using the ATFL-PTFL angle could be a reliable assessment method for CAI, so as to improve the accuracy and specificity of clinical diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 240 participants: 120 CAI patients and 120 healthy volunteers between 2015 and 2021. The ATFL-PTFL angle of the ankle region was gaged in the cross-sectional supine position on MRI between two groups. After participants undergoing a comprehensive MRI scanning, ATFL-PTFL angles were regarded as the main indicator of patients with the injured ATFLs and healthy volunteers to compare, and were measured by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist. Moreover, other qualitative and quantitative indicators referring to anatomical and morphological characteristics of the AFTL were included in this study with MRI, such as the length, width, thickness, shape, continuity, and signal intensity of the ATFL, which can be used as secondary indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the CAI group, the ATFL-PTFL angle was 90.8° ± 5.7°, which was significantly different from the non-CAI group where the ATFL-PTFL angle for 80.0° ± 3.7° (p < 0.001). As for the ATFL-MRI characteristics, the length (p = 0.003), width (p < 0.001), and thickness (p < 0.001) in the CAI group were also significantly different from the non-CAI group. Over 90% of the cases, patients of the CAI group had injured ATFL with an irregular shape, non-continuous, and high or mixed signal intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with healthy people, the ATFL-PTFL angle of most CAI patients is larger, which can be used as a secondary index to diagnose CAI. However, the MRI characteristic changes of ATFL may not relate to the increased ATFL-PTFL angle.</p>","PeriodicalId":49296,"journal":{"name":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10533641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03196-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study intended to compare the difference between the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) and posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL) angle with chronic ankle instability (CAI) patients and healthy volunteers, and to confirm whether using the ATFL-PTFL angle could be a reliable assessment method for CAI, so as to improve the accuracy and specificity of clinical diagnosis.

Methods: This retrospective study included 240 participants: 120 CAI patients and 120 healthy volunteers between 2015 and 2021. The ATFL-PTFL angle of the ankle region was gaged in the cross-sectional supine position on MRI between two groups. After participants undergoing a comprehensive MRI scanning, ATFL-PTFL angles were regarded as the main indicator of patients with the injured ATFLs and healthy volunteers to compare, and were measured by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist. Moreover, other qualitative and quantitative indicators referring to anatomical and morphological characteristics of the AFTL were included in this study with MRI, such as the length, width, thickness, shape, continuity, and signal intensity of the ATFL, which can be used as secondary indicators.

Results: In the CAI group, the ATFL-PTFL angle was 90.8° ± 5.7°, which was significantly different from the non-CAI group where the ATFL-PTFL angle for 80.0° ± 3.7° (p < 0.001). As for the ATFL-MRI characteristics, the length (p = 0.003), width (p < 0.001), and thickness (p < 0.001) in the CAI group were also significantly different from the non-CAI group. Over 90% of the cases, patients of the CAI group had injured ATFL with an irregular shape, non-continuous, and high or mixed signal intensity.

Conclusion: Compared with healthy people, the ATFL-PTFL angle of most CAI patients is larger, which can be used as a secondary index to diagnose CAI. However, the MRI characteristic changes of ATFL may not relate to the increased ATFL-PTFL angle.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MRI上距腓前韧带-距腓后韧带角度的增加可能有助于评估慢性踝关节不稳定。
目的:本研究旨在比较慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)患者和健康志愿者的距腓前韧带(ATFL)和距腓后韧带(PTFL)角度的差异,以确定ATFL-PTFL角度是否是一种可靠的CAI评估方法,从而提高临床诊断的准确性和特异性。方法:这项回顾性研究包括240名参与者:2015年至2021年间的120名CAI患者和120名健康志愿者。在MRI上测量两组患者的踝关节区域的ATFL-PTFL角度。在参与者接受全面的MRI扫描后,ATFL-PTFL角度被视为受伤ATFL患者和健康志愿者的主要指标进行比较,并由经验丰富的肌肉骨骼放射科医生进行测量。此外,本研究还包括了涉及AFTL解剖和形态学特征的其他定性和定量指标,如ATFL的长度、宽度、厚度、形状、连续性和信号强度,这些指标可作为次要指标。结果:在CAI组中,ATFL-PTFL角度为90.8° ± 5.7°,与ATFL-PTFL角度为80.0°的非CAI组有显著差异 ± 3.7°(p 结论:与健康人相比,大多数CAI患者的ATFL-PTFL角度较大,可作为诊断CAI的次要指标。然而,ATFL的MRI特征变化可能与ATFL-PTFL角度的增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Anatomy is a morphological science which cannot fail to interest the clinician. The practical application of anatomical research to clinical problems necessitates special adaptation and selectivity in choosing from numerous international works. Although there is a tendency to believe that meaningful advances in anatomy are unlikely, constant revision is necessary. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, the first international journal of Clinical anatomy has been created in this spirit. Its goal is to serve clinicians, regardless of speciality-physicians, surgeons, radiologists or other specialists-as an indispensable aid with which they can improve their knowledge of anatomy. Each issue includes: Original papers, review articles, articles on the anatomical bases of medical, surgical and radiological techniques, articles of normal radiologic anatomy, brief reviews of anatomical publications of clinical interest. Particular attention is given to high quality illustrations, which are indispensable for a better understanding of anatomical problems. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy is a journal written by anatomists for clinicians with a special interest in anatomy.
期刊最新文献
V3 segment of the right vertebral artery taking an anomalous posterosuperior course and penetrating occipital bone (wall of the jugular foramen) diagnosed by magnetic resonance angiography Anatomical investigation of the morphometry of the cerebral arteries using digital subtraction angiography in the Thai population ChatGPT efficacy for answering musculoskeletal anatomy questions: a study evaluating quality and consistency between raters and timepoints Morphology and arterial supply of the pyramidalis muscle in an Australian female population using computed tomography angiography Regional variations and sex-related differences of stiffness in human tracheal ligaments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1