Select, route and schedule: optimizing community paramedicine service delivery with mandatory visits and patient prioritization.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Care Management Science Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1007/s10729-023-09646-3
Shima Azizi, Özge Aygül, Brenton Faber, Sharon Johnson, Renata Konrad, Andrew C Trapp
{"title":"Select, route and schedule: optimizing community paramedicine service delivery with mandatory visits and patient prioritization.","authors":"Shima Azizi, Özge Aygül, Brenton Faber, Sharon Johnson, Renata Konrad, Andrew C Trapp","doi":"10.1007/s10729-023-09646-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare delivery in the United States has been characterized as overly reactive and dependent on emergency department care for safety net coverage, with opportunity for improvement around discharge planning and high readmissions and emergency department bounce-back rates. Community paramedicine is a recent healthcare innovation that enables proactive visitation of patients at home, often shortly after emergency department and hospital discharge. We establish the first optimization-based framework to study efficiencies in the management and operation of a community paramedicine program. The collective innovations of our modeling include i) a novel hierarchical objective function with the goals of fairly increasing patient welfare, lowering hospital costs, and reducing readmissions and emergency department visits, ii) a new constraint set that ensures priority same-day visits for emergent patients, and iii) a further extension of our model to determine the minimum supplemental resources necessary to ensure feasibility in a single optimization formulation. Our medical-need based objective function prioritizes patients based on their clinical features and seeks to select and schedule patient visits and route healthcare providers to maximize overall patient welfare while favoring shorter tours. We use our methods to develop managerial insights via computational experiments on a variety of test instances based on real data from a hospital system in Upstate New York. We are able to identify optimal and nearly optimal tours that efficiently select, route, and schedule patients in reasonable timeframes. Our results lead to insights that can support managerial decisions about establishing (and improving existing) community paramedicine programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12903,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-023-09646-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Healthcare delivery in the United States has been characterized as overly reactive and dependent on emergency department care for safety net coverage, with opportunity for improvement around discharge planning and high readmissions and emergency department bounce-back rates. Community paramedicine is a recent healthcare innovation that enables proactive visitation of patients at home, often shortly after emergency department and hospital discharge. We establish the first optimization-based framework to study efficiencies in the management and operation of a community paramedicine program. The collective innovations of our modeling include i) a novel hierarchical objective function with the goals of fairly increasing patient welfare, lowering hospital costs, and reducing readmissions and emergency department visits, ii) a new constraint set that ensures priority same-day visits for emergent patients, and iii) a further extension of our model to determine the minimum supplemental resources necessary to ensure feasibility in a single optimization formulation. Our medical-need based objective function prioritizes patients based on their clinical features and seeks to select and schedule patient visits and route healthcare providers to maximize overall patient welfare while favoring shorter tours. We use our methods to develop managerial insights via computational experiments on a variety of test instances based on real data from a hospital system in Upstate New York. We are able to identify optimal and nearly optimal tours that efficiently select, route, and schedule patients in reasonable timeframes. Our results lead to insights that can support managerial decisions about establishing (and improving existing) community paramedicine programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择、路线和时间表:通过强制就诊和患者优先顺序优化社区护理服务提供。
美国的医疗保健服务被描述为反应过度,依赖急诊部门的护理来获得安全网覆盖,有机会在出院计划、高再入院率和急诊部门反弹率方面进行改进。社区护理人员是最近的一项医疗创新,通常在急诊科和出院后不久,可以在家中主动探视患者。我们建立了第一个基于优化的框架来研究社区辅助医疗项目的管理和运营效率。我们建模的集体创新包括i)一个新的分层目标函数,其目标是公平增加患者福利、降低医院成本、减少再次入院和急诊就诊;ii)一个确保急诊患者当天优先就诊的新约束集,以及iii)我们的模型的进一步扩展,以确定确保单个优化公式中的可行性所需的最小补充资源。我们基于医疗需求的目标函数根据患者的临床特征对其进行优先排序,并寻求选择和安排患者就诊时间,并为医疗保健提供者提供路线,以最大限度地提高患者的整体福利,同时支持缩短就诊时间。我们使用我们的方法,通过基于纽约上州医院系统真实数据的各种测试实例的计算实验,开发管理见解。我们能够确定最佳和近乎最佳的旅行,在合理的时间范围内有效地选择、安排和安排患者。我们的研究结果提供了一些见解,可以支持关于建立(和改进现有)社区辅助医疗项目的管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Science
Health Care Management Science HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Science publishes papers dealing with health care delivery, health care management, and health care policy. Papers should have a decision focus and make use of quantitative methods including management science, operations research, analytics, machine learning, and other emerging areas. Articles must clearly articulate the relevance and the realized or potential impact of the work. Applied research will be considered and is of particular interest if there is evidence that it was implemented or informed a decision-making process. Papers describing routine applications of known methods are discouraged. Authors are encouraged to disclose all data and analyses thereof, and to provide computational code when appropriate. Editorial statements for the individual departments are provided below. Health Care Analytics Departmental Editors: Margrét Bjarnadóttir, University of Maryland Nan Kong, Purdue University With the explosion in computing power and available data, we have seen fast changes in the analytics applied in the healthcare space. The Health Care Analytics department welcomes papers applying a broad range of analytical approaches, including those rooted in machine learning, survival analysis, and complex event analysis, that allow healthcare professionals to find opportunities for improvement in health system management, patient engagement, spending, and diagnosis. We especially encourage papers that combine predictive and prescriptive analytics to improve decision making and health care outcomes. The contribution of papers can be across multiple dimensions including new methodology, novel modeling techniques and health care through real-world cohort studies. Papers that are methodologically focused need in addition to show practical relevance. Similarly papers that are application focused should clearly demonstrate improvements over the status quo and available approaches by applying rigorous analytics. Health Care Operations Management Departmental Editors: Nilay Tanik Argon, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Bob Batt, University of Wisconsin The department invites high-quality papers on the design, control, and analysis of operations at healthcare systems. We seek papers on classical operations management issues (such as scheduling, routing, queuing, transportation, patient flow, and quality) as well as non-traditional problems driven by everchanging healthcare practice. Empirical, experimental, and analytical (model based) methodologies are all welcome. Papers may draw theory from across disciplines, and should provide insight into improving operations from the perspective of patients, service providers, organizations (municipal/government/industry), and/or society. Health Care Management Science Practice Departmental Editor: Vikram Tiwari, Vanderbilt University Medical Center The department seeks research from academicians and practitioners that highlights Management Science based solutions directly relevant to the practice of healthcare. Relevance is judged by the impact on practice, as well as the degree to which researchers engaged with practitioners in understanding the problem context and in developing the solution. Validity, that is, the extent to which the results presented do or would apply in practice is a key evaluation criterion. In addition to meeting the journal’s standards of originality and substantial contribution to knowledge creation, research that can be replicated in other organizations is encouraged. Papers describing unsuccessful applied research projects may be considered if there are generalizable learning points addressing why the project was unsuccessful. Health Care Productivity Analysis Departmental Editor: Jonas Schreyögg, University of Hamburg The department invites papers with rigorous methods and significant impact for policy and practice. Papers typically apply theory and techniques to measuring productivity in health care organizations and systems. The journal welcomes state-of-the-art parametric as well as non-parametric techniques such as data envelopment analysis, stochastic frontier analysis or partial frontier analysis. The contribution of papers can be manifold including new methodology, novel combination of existing methods or application of existing methods to new contexts. Empirical papers should produce results generalizable beyond a selected set of health care organizations. All papers should include a section on implications for management or policy to enhance productivity. Public Health Policy and Medical Decision Making Departmental Editors: Ebru Bish, University of Alabama Julie L. Higle, University of Southern California The department invites high quality papers that use data-driven methods to address important problems that arise in public health policy and medical decision-making domains. We welcome submissions that develop and apply mathematical and computational models in support of data-driven and model-based analyses for these problems. The Public Health Policy and Medical Decision-Making Department is particularly interested in papers that: Study high-impact problems involving health policy, treatment planning and design, and clinical applications; Develop original data-driven models, including those that integrate disease modeling with screening and/or treatment guidelines; Use model-based analyses as decision making-tools to identify optimal solutions, insights, recommendations. Articles must clearly articulate the relevance of the work to decision and/or policy makers and the potential impact on patients and/or society. Papers will include articulated contributions within the methodological domain, which may include modeling, analytical, or computational methodologies. Emerging Topics Departmental Editor: Alec Morton, University of Strathclyde Emerging Topics will handle papers which use innovative quantitative methods to shed light on frontier issues in healthcare management and policy. Such papers may deal with analytic challenges arising from novel health technologies or new organizational forms. Papers falling under this department may also deal with the analysis of new forms of data which are increasingly captured as health systems become more and more digitized.
期刊最新文献
Forecasting to support EMS tactical planning: what is important and what is not. Health care management science for underserved populations. Optimization of testing protocols to screen for COVID-19: a multi-objective model. A novel two-stage network data envelopment analysis model for kidney allocation problem under medical and logistical uncertainty: a real case study. The benefits (or detriments) of adapting to demand disruptions in a hospital pharmacy with supply chain disruptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1