Health Care Management Science最新文献

The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on the tertiary sector, particularly in healthcare, which faced unprecedented demand despite the existence of limited resources, such as hospital beds, staffing resources, and funding. The magnitude and global scale of this crisis provide a compelling incentive to thoroughly analyse its effects. This study aims to identify best practices within the Portuguese national healthcare service, with the goal of improving preparedness for future crises and informing policy decisions. Using a Benefit-of-the-Doubt (BoD) approach, this research constructs composite indicators to assess the pandemic's impact on the Portuguese public hospitals. The study analyzes monthly data from 2017 to May 2022, highlighting critical trends and performance fluctuations during this period. The findings reveal that each COVID-19 wave led to a decline in hospital performance, with the first wave being the most severe due to a lack of preparedness. Furthermore, the pandemic worsened the disparities among examined hospitals. Pre-pandemic top performers in each group improved their performance and were more consistently recognized as benchmarks, with their average benchmark frequency increasing from 66.5% to 83.5%. These top entities demonstrated greater resilience and adaptability, further distancing themselves from underperforming hospitals, which saw declines in both performance scores and benchmark frequency, widening the performance gap. The superior performance of top entities can be attributed to pre-existing strategic tools and contextual factors that enabled them to withstand the pandemic's challenges more effectively. HIGHLIGHTS: • The pandemic aggravated the differences between the hospitals examined. • The top-performing entities further distanced themselves from the remaining entities after the pandemic • Entities considered benchmarks before the pandemic remained the same, and became even more consistent during the pandemic. • The top-performing entities achieved higher scores than their pre-pandemic performance levels. • Benchmarking models for composite indicators with diverse decision-making preferences, and treatment of imperfect knowledge of data.

Over recent years, home health care has gained significant attention as an efficient solution to the increasing demand for healthcare services. Home health care scheduling is a challenging problem involving multiple complicated assignments and routing decisions subject to various constraints. The problem becomes even more challenging when considered on a rolling horizon with stochastic patient requests. This paper discusses the Online Dynamic Home Health Care Scheduling Problem (ODHHCSP), in which a home health care agency has to decide whether to accept or reject a patient request and determine the visit schedule and routes in case of acceptance. The objective of the problem is to maximize the number of patients served, given the limited resources. When the agency receives a patient's request, a decision must be made on the spot, which poses many challenges, such as stochastic future requests or a limited time budget for decision-making. In this paper, we model the problem as a Markov decision process and propose a reinforcement learning (RL) approach. The experimental results show that the proposed approach outperforms other algorithms in the literature in terms of solution quality. In addition, a constant runtime of less than 0.001 seconds for each decision makes the approach especially suitable for an online setting like our problem.

Background: Despite decades of pursuing health equity, racial and ethnic disparities persist in healthcare in America. For cancer specifically, one of the leading observed disparities is worse mortality among non-Hispanic Black patients compared to non-Hispanic White patients across the cancer care continuum. These real-world disparities are reflected in the data used to inform the decisions made to alleviate such inequities. Failing to account for inherently biased data underlying these observations could intensify racial cancer disparities and lead to misguided efforts that fail to appropriately address the real causes of health inequity.

Objective: Estimate the racial/ethnic bias of machine learning models in predicting two-year survival and surgery treatment recommendation for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Methods: A Cox survival model, and a LOGIT model as well as three other machine learning models for predicting surgery recommendation were trained using SEER data from NSCLC patients diagnosed from 2000-2018. Models were trained with a 70/30 train/test split (both including and excluding race/ethnicity) and evaluated using performance and fairness metrics. The effects of oversampling the training data were also evaluated.

Results: The survival models show disparate impact towards non-Hispanic Black patients regardless of whether race/ethnicity is used as a predictor. The models including race/ethnicity amplified the disparities observed in the data. The exclusion of race/ethnicity as a predictor in the survival and surgery recommendation models improved fairness metrics without degrading model performance. Stratified oversampling strategies reduced disparate impact while reducing the accuracy of the model.

Conclusion: NSCLC disparities are complex and multifaceted. Yet, even when accounting for age and stage at diagnosis, non-Hispanic Black patients with NSCLC are less often recommended to have surgery than non-Hispanic White patients. Machine learning models amplified the racial/ethnic disparities across the cancer care continuum (which are reflected in the data used to make model decisions). Excluding race/ethnicity lowered the bias of the models but did not affect disparate impact. Developing analytical strategies to improve fairness would in turn improve the utility of machine learning approaches analyzing population-based cancer data.

Forecasting emergency medical service (EMS) call volumes is critical for resource allocation and planning. The development of many commercial and free software packages has made a variety of forecasting methods accessible. Practitioners, however, are left with little guidance on selecting the most appropriate method for their needs. Using 5 years of data from 3 cities in Alberta, we compute exponential smoothing and benchmark forecasts for 8-hour periods for each ambulance station catchment area and with a forecast horizon of two weeks-a spatio-temporal resolution appropriate for tactical planning. The methods that we consider differ on three spectra: the number and type of time-series components, whether forecasts are computed individually or jointly, and the way in which forecasts at a specific resolution are converted to forecasts at the resolution of interest. We find that it is important to include a weekly seasonal component when forecasting EMS demand. Multiplicative seasonality, however, shows no benefit over additive seasonality. Adding other time-series components (e.g., trend, ARMA errors, Box-Cox transformation) does not improve performance. Spatial resolutions of station catchment area and lower, and temporal resolution of 4-24 hours perform similarly. We adapt an existing hierarchical forecasting framework to a two-dimensional spatio-temporal hierarchy, but find that hierarchical reconciliation of forecasts does not improve performance at the forecast resolution of interest for tactical planning. Neither does jointly forecasting time series. We show that added complexity does not materially improve forecasting performance. The simple methods that we find perform well are easy to implement and interpret, making implementation in practice more likely. In a simulation study we alter the empirical weekly patterns and demonstrate how extreme differences between the weekly seasonality patterns of different regions cause hierarchically-reconciled bottom-up approaches to outperform top-down approaches.

In this paper we develop a new multi-objective simulated annealing (MOSA) algorithm to generate optimal testing protocols for infectious diseases, using the COVID-19 pandemic as our context. A SEIR (susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered) epidemiological model is embedded as the computational platform for our MOSA algorithm to optimize testing protocols for screening across three joint objectives: minimum cost of test materials, minimum total infections over the testing horizon, and minimum number of false negatives over the horizon. We demonstrate the application of this optimization tool to recommend screening protocols for K-12 school districts in the U.S. State of North Carolina. Our approach is scalable by population coverage and can be employed at the level of individual school districts or regional collections of districts, individual schools or collections of schools across a district, business sites, or nursing homes, among other congregate settings where individuals may be screened prior to gaining entry to the site. The algorithm can be solved two ways, generating either independent optimal protocols across individual testing locations, or a common protocol covering all locations in the collection of testing sites. Our findings can be used to inform policy decisions to guide the development of effective testing strategies for controlling the spread of COVID-19 or other pandemic diseases in a wide range of congregate settings across various geographic regions.

Organ transplantation is one of the most complicated and challenging treatments in healthcare systems. Despite the significant medical advancements, many patients die while waiting for organ transplants because of the noticeable differences between organ supply and demand. In the organ transplantation supply chain, organ allocation is the most significant decision during the organ transplantation procedure, and kidney is the most widely transplanted organ. This research presents a novel method for assessing the efficiency and ranking of qualified organ-patient pairs as decision-making units (DMUs) for kidney allocation problem in the existence of COVID-19 pandemic and uncertain medical and logistical data. To achieve this goal, two-stage network data envelopment analysis (DEA) and credibility-based chance constraint programming (CCP) are utilized to develop a novel two-stage fuzzy network data envelopment analysis (TSFNDEA) method. The main benefits of the developed method can be summarized as follows: considering internal structures in kidney allocation system, investigating both medical and logistical aspects of the problem, the capability of expanding to other network structures, and unique efficiency decomposition under uncertainty. Moreover, in order to evaluate the validity and applicability of the proposed approach, a validation algorithm utilizing a real case study and different confidence levels is used. Finally, the numerical results indicate that the developed approach outperforms the existing kidney allocation system.

Supply chain disruptions and demand disruptions make it challenging for hospital pharmacy managers to determine how much inventory to have on-hand. Having insufficient inventory leads to drug shortages, while having excess inventory leads to drug waste. To mitigate drug shortages and waste, hospital pharmacy managers can implement inventory policies that account for supply chain disruptions and adapt these inventory policies over time to respond to demand disruptions. Demand disruptions were prevalent during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, it remains unclear how a drug's shortage-waste weighting (i.e., concern for shortages versus concern for waste) as well as the duration of and time between supply chain disruptions influence the benefits (or detriments) of adapting to demand disruptions. We develop an adaptive inventory system (i.e., inventory policies change over time) and conduct an extensive numerical analysis using real-world demand data from the University of Michigan's Central Pharmacy to address this research question. For a fixed mean duration of and mean time between supply chain disruptions, we find a drug's shortage-waste weighting dictates the magnitude of the benefits (or detriments) of adaptive inventory policies. We create a ranking procedure that provides a way of discerning which drugs are of most concern and illustrates which policies to update given that a limited number of inventory policies can be updated. When applying our framework to over 300 drugs, we find a decision-maker needs to update a very small proportion of drugs (e.g., $<5\%$ ) at any point in time to get the greatest benefits of adaptive inventory policies.

Volunteer responder systems (VRS) alert and guide nearby lay rescuers towards the location of an emergency. An application of such a system is to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, where early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation with an automated external defibrillator (AED) are crucial for improving survival rates. However, many AEDs remain underutilized due to poor location choices, while other areas lack adequate AED coverage. In this paper, we present a comprehensive data-driven algorithmic approach to optimize deployment of (additional) public-access AEDs to be used in a VRS. Alongside a binary integer programming (BIP) formulation, we consider two heuristic methods, namely Greedy and Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure (GRASP), to solve the gradual Maximal Covering Location (MCLP) problem with partial coverage for AED deployment. We develop realistic gradually decreasing coverage functions for volunteers going on foot, by bike, or by car. A spatial probability distribution of cardiac arrest is estimated using kernel density estimation to be used as input for the models and to evaluate the solutions. We apply our approach to 29 real-world instances (municipalities) in the Netherlands. We show that GRASP can obtain near-optimal solutions for large problem instances in significantly less time than the exact method. The results indicate that relocating existing AEDs improves the weighted average coverage from 36% to 49% across all municipalities, with relative improvements ranging from 1% to 175%. For most municipalities, strategically placing 5 to 10 additional AEDs can already provide substantial improvements.