Evaluating rearing behaviour as a model-specific pain indicator in mouse osteotomy models.

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Laboratory Animals Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1177/00236772231183197
Angelique Wolter, Paulin Jirkof, Christa Thöne-Reineke, Anna E Rapp, Annemarie Lang
{"title":"Evaluating rearing behaviour as a model-specific pain indicator in mouse osteotomy models.","authors":"Angelique Wolter, Paulin Jirkof, Christa Thöne-Reineke, Anna E Rapp, Annemarie Lang","doi":"10.1177/00236772231183197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess pain in mouse models of bone fractures, currently applied assessment batteries use combinations of clinical signs with spontaneous behaviours and model-specific behaviours, including walking and weight-bearing behaviour. Rearing behaviour - an upright position on the hindlimbs - has a motivational and an ambulatory component. Thus, rearing behaviour might have the potential to be an indicator for model-specific pain in mouse fracture models. To date, the assessment of rearing behaviour in bone fracture models using mice is only scarcely described. In this study, we aimed to determine whether the duration of rearing behaviour is affected by osteotomy of the femur in male and female C57BL/6N mice with external fixation (rigid <i>vs</i>. flexible) and could be an additional sign for model-specific pain, such as the presence of limping. Rearing duration was significantly decreased after osteotomy in male and female mice at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, but was not affected by anaesthesia/analgesia alone. In male mice, the relative rearing duration increased over 72 h (both fixations) and at 10 days in the rigid fixation group but remained significantly lower in the flexible fixation group. In contrast, in female mice, no increase in rearing duration was observed within 72 h and at 10 days post-osteotomy, independent of the fixation. We did not identify any association between relative rearing time and presence or absence of limping. In summary, our results do not provide sufficient evidence that altered rearing behaviour might be an indicative sign for pain in this model.</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772231183197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess pain in mouse models of bone fractures, currently applied assessment batteries use combinations of clinical signs with spontaneous behaviours and model-specific behaviours, including walking and weight-bearing behaviour. Rearing behaviour - an upright position on the hindlimbs - has a motivational and an ambulatory component. Thus, rearing behaviour might have the potential to be an indicator for model-specific pain in mouse fracture models. To date, the assessment of rearing behaviour in bone fracture models using mice is only scarcely described. In this study, we aimed to determine whether the duration of rearing behaviour is affected by osteotomy of the femur in male and female C57BL/6N mice with external fixation (rigid vs. flexible) and could be an additional sign for model-specific pain, such as the presence of limping. Rearing duration was significantly decreased after osteotomy in male and female mice at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, but was not affected by anaesthesia/analgesia alone. In male mice, the relative rearing duration increased over 72 h (both fixations) and at 10 days in the rigid fixation group but remained significantly lower in the flexible fixation group. In contrast, in female mice, no increase in rearing duration was observed within 72 h and at 10 days post-osteotomy, independent of the fixation. We did not identify any association between relative rearing time and presence or absence of limping. In summary, our results do not provide sufficient evidence that altered rearing behaviour might be an indicative sign for pain in this model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估小鼠截骨模型中作为模型特异性疼痛指标的饲养行为。
为了评估骨折小鼠模型中的疼痛,目前使用的评估电池将临床症状与自发行为和模型特定行为(包括行走和负重行为)相结合。仰卧行为--后肢直立的姿势--具有动机和活动的成分。因此,仰卧行为有可能成为小鼠骨折模型中模型特异性疼痛的指标。迄今为止,对使用小鼠的骨折模型中仰卧行为的评估还鲜有描述。在这项研究中,我们的目的是确定在雌雄C57BL/6N小鼠股骨外固定(刚性与柔性)截骨术后,饲养行为的持续时间是否会受到影响,以及饲养行为是否可以作为模型特异性疼痛的额外标志,如是否出现跛行。截骨术后,雄性和雌性小鼠在24小时、48小时和72小时内的饲养持续时间明显缩短,但不受单独麻醉/镇痛的影响。在雄性小鼠中,刚性固定组的相对饲养持续时间在 72 小时内(两种固定方式)和 10 天内都有所增加,但在柔性固定组中仍明显较短。相反,在雌性小鼠中,无论采用哪种固定方式,在骨切除术后 72 小时内和 10 天内均未观察到饲养持续时间的增加。我们没有发现相对饲养时间与是否出现跛行之间有任何关联。总之,我们的研究结果没有提供足够的证据表明,在该模型中,饲养行为的改变可能是疼痛的一个指示性信号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laboratory Animals
Laboratory Animals 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.
期刊最新文献
Half the price, twice the gain: How to simultaneously decrease animal numbers and increase precision with good experimental design. Heterogeneity of animal experiments and how to deal with it. How cage effects can hurt statistical analyses of completely randomized designs. Simulation methodologies to determine statistical power in laboratory animal research studies. Understanding p-values and significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1