Cellular immune response against rabies vaccination in laboratory-bred dogs: A systematised review.

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Laboratory Animals Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1177/00236772241300782
Hasanthi Rathnadiwakara, Sachini Amarasekara, Florence Cliquet, Jean-Christophe Thibault, Roshan N Jalaldeen, Mangala Gunatilake
{"title":"Cellular immune response against rabies vaccination in laboratory-bred dogs: A systematised review.","authors":"Hasanthi Rathnadiwakara, Sachini Amarasekara, Florence Cliquet, Jean-Christophe Thibault, Roshan N Jalaldeen, Mangala Gunatilake","doi":"10.1177/00236772241300782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The immunogenicity of rabies vaccines is commonly measured by serological testing, which includes measuring rabies virus-neutralising antibody titre levels in the serum. Apart from humoral immunity, cellular immunity measurements are also helpful in assessing the immunogenicity and efficacy of rabies vaccinations. Recently, there has been an increased emphasis on cellular immunity measurements against rabies in humans and animals. This review aimed to systematically analyse the literature on the composition of cellular immune responses against rabies vaccination in laboratory dogs. A literature survey was conducted to collect suitable articles by searching the research databases PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. Subsequently, a two-person screening was conducted to identify suitable articles based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction was performed by two authors independently. A total of 1396 studies were identified from the initial search. Following the screening, six studies were selected for final review. Different methods of detecting immune parameters from peripheral blood mononuclear cells were identified from the studies. Reports have demonstrated positive outcomes of the use of adjuvants for cellular immunity development. Even though the lack of specific immunological techniques and the specific reagents have negatively affected these types of cellular immunity measurements, it was evident that combining both humoral and cellular immune parameters against the rabies antigen would provide a clearer picture of the level of responsiveness in animals towards vaccinations and the protection against the disease. The protocol for this review was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (CRD42022380023).</p>","PeriodicalId":18013,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animals","volume":" ","pages":"236772241300782"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772241300782","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The immunogenicity of rabies vaccines is commonly measured by serological testing, which includes measuring rabies virus-neutralising antibody titre levels in the serum. Apart from humoral immunity, cellular immunity measurements are also helpful in assessing the immunogenicity and efficacy of rabies vaccinations. Recently, there has been an increased emphasis on cellular immunity measurements against rabies in humans and animals. This review aimed to systematically analyse the literature on the composition of cellular immune responses against rabies vaccination in laboratory dogs. A literature survey was conducted to collect suitable articles by searching the research databases PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. Subsequently, a two-person screening was conducted to identify suitable articles based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction was performed by two authors independently. A total of 1396 studies were identified from the initial search. Following the screening, six studies were selected for final review. Different methods of detecting immune parameters from peripheral blood mononuclear cells were identified from the studies. Reports have demonstrated positive outcomes of the use of adjuvants for cellular immunity development. Even though the lack of specific immunological techniques and the specific reagents have negatively affected these types of cellular immunity measurements, it was evident that combining both humoral and cellular immune parameters against the rabies antigen would provide a clearer picture of the level of responsiveness in animals towards vaccinations and the protection against the disease. The protocol for this review was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (CRD42022380023).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laboratory Animals
Laboratory Animals 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The international journal of laboratory animal science and welfare, Laboratory Animals publishes peer-reviewed original papers and reviews on all aspects of the use of animals in biomedical research. The journal promotes improvements in the welfare or well-being of the animals used, it particularly focuses on research that reduces the number of animals used or which replaces animal models with in vitro alternatives.
期刊最新文献
Current practices of pain assessment and analgesic use in laboratory mice: A 2022 FELASA Working Group survey. Cellular immune response against rabies vaccination in laboratory-bred dogs: A systematised review. Current research and guidelines for euthanasia in laboratory fish with a focus on fathead minnows. Inconsistent terminology in rodent anatomy hinders appropriate blood sampling in laboratory animal science: A review of blood sampling techniques on the head of mice. Moving from guideline recommendations to practical, reasonable proposals: Biosafety considerations, breeding performance and challenges during specific pathogen-free animal facility enlargement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1