Patient adverse events and technical failures with the bravo capsule pH system: insights from the MAUDE database.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Esophagus Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-21 DOI:10.1007/s10388-023-01007-x
Daryl Ramai, Peter Bhandari, Anjali Kewalramani, Daniel Mozell, Saurabh Chandan, Antonio Facciorusso, Paraskevas Gkolfakis, Arun Swaminath, Douglas G Adler
{"title":"Patient adverse events and technical failures with the bravo capsule pH system: insights from the MAUDE database.","authors":"Daryl Ramai,&nbsp;Peter Bhandari,&nbsp;Anjali Kewalramani,&nbsp;Daniel Mozell,&nbsp;Saurabh Chandan,&nbsp;Antonio Facciorusso,&nbsp;Paraskevas Gkolfakis,&nbsp;Arun Swaminath,&nbsp;Douglas G Adler","doi":"10.1007/s10388-023-01007-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The BRAVO pH monitor system can benefit patients with ongoing GERD symptoms despite treatment and/or atypical symptoms. We aim to investigate the number and type of complications associated with the BRAVO pH capsule.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From April 2016 through February 2021, we analyzed post-marketing surveillance data from the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, approximately 1,651 reports were identified with 2391 cases associated with a device failure, and 254 reporting a patient-related adverse event. Most device complications were due to aspiration n = 153), followed by reported pain (n = 79), injury (unspecified) (n = 63), and additional radiologic imaging (n = 44). Laceration and bleeding accounted for 29 and 19 cases. Furthermore, three patients suffered perforation. Most device failures were due to loss or failure of the Bravo capsule to bond or adhere to the esophageal mucosa as planned (n = 1269), followed by an activation or positioning failure (n = 972), premature detachment of device (n = 284), and failure of the device to record or transmit data (n = 158).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings from the MAUDE database highlight the risk of aspiration, hemorrhage/bleeding, perforation, injury, and retention as potential complications of BRAVO capsule placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":11918,"journal":{"name":"Esophagus","volume":"20 4","pages":"757-760"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-023-01007-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The BRAVO pH monitor system can benefit patients with ongoing GERD symptoms despite treatment and/or atypical symptoms. We aim to investigate the number and type of complications associated with the BRAVO pH capsule.

Methods: From April 2016 through February 2021, we analyzed post-marketing surveillance data from the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database.

Results: During the study period, approximately 1,651 reports were identified with 2391 cases associated with a device failure, and 254 reporting a patient-related adverse event. Most device complications were due to aspiration n = 153), followed by reported pain (n = 79), injury (unspecified) (n = 63), and additional radiologic imaging (n = 44). Laceration and bleeding accounted for 29 and 19 cases. Furthermore, three patients suffered perforation. Most device failures were due to loss or failure of the Bravo capsule to bond or adhere to the esophageal mucosa as planned (n = 1269), followed by an activation or positioning failure (n = 972), premature detachment of device (n = 284), and failure of the device to record or transmit data (n = 158).

Conclusions: Findings from the MAUDE database highlight the risk of aspiration, hemorrhage/bleeding, perforation, injury, and retention as potential complications of BRAVO capsule placement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
bravo胶囊pH系统的患者不良事件和技术故障:MAUDE数据库的见解。
背景:尽管有治疗和/或非典型症状,BRAVO pH监测系统仍能使GERD症状持续的患者受益。我们的目的是研究与BRAVO pH胶囊相关的并发症的数量和类型。方法:从2016年4月到2021年2月,我们分析了美国食品药品监督管理局制造商和用户设备体验(MAUDE)数据库中的上市后监测数据。结果:在研究期间,发现了大约1651份报告,其中2391例与设备故障有关,254例报告了与患者相关的不良事件。大多数器械并发症是由于抽吸引起的 = 153),然后是报告的疼痛(n = 79),受伤(未指明)(n = 63)和额外的放射学成像(n = 44)。撕裂出血29例,出血19例。此外,还有三名患者穿孔。大多数装置故障是由于Bravo胶囊丢失或未能按计划结合或粘附在食管粘膜上(n = 1269),随后是激活或定位失败(n = 972),装置过早脱离(n = 284),以及设备记录或传输数据的故障(n = 158)。结论:MAUDE数据库的研究结果强调了BRAVO胶囊置入的潜在并发症是误吸、出血/出血、穿孔、损伤和滞留的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Esophagus
Esophagus GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Esophagus, the official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, introduces practitioners and researchers to significant studies in the fields of benign and malignant diseases of the esophagus. The journal welcomes original articles, review articles, and short articles including technical notes ( How I do it ), which will be peer-reviewed by the editorial board. Letters to the editor are also welcome. Special articles on esophageal diseases will be provided by the editorial board, and proceedings of symposia and workshops will be included in special issues for the Annual Congress of the Society.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial cancer of the remnant esophagus after esophagectomy. Exploring novel immunotherapy in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Is targeting TIGIT an answer? Multimodal deep-learning model using pre-treatment endoscopic images and clinical information to predict efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Lymph-node ratio as a risk factor for recurrence following neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. A nationwide survey on the safety of cricothyrotomy: a multicenter retrospective study in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1