The Relationship between the Biofilm Genes and Antibiotic Resistance in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

IF 2.8 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY International Journal of Microbiology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2023/8873948
Fatemeh Sameni, Bahareh Hajikhani, Ali Hashemi, Parviz Owlia, Mohammad Niakan, Masoud Dadashi
{"title":"The Relationship between the Biofilm Genes and Antibiotic Resistance in <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i>.","authors":"Fatemeh Sameni,&nbsp;Bahareh Hajikhani,&nbsp;Ali Hashemi,&nbsp;Parviz Owlia,&nbsp;Mohammad Niakan,&nbsp;Masoud Dadashi","doi":"10.1155/2023/8873948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Today, <i>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i> (<i>S. maltophilia</i>) is a major opportunistic pathogen among hospitalized or immunocompromised patients. Antibiotic-resistant clinical isolates are increasing in several parts of the world. Various antibiotic-resistance and biofilm-forming genes are identified in this bacterium. Its capacity to form biofilms is an important virulence factor that may impact antibiotic-resistance patterns. In the current study, we evaluated the biofilm-formation capacity, antibiotic-resistance profile, and prevalence of biofilm-forming genes as well as antibiotic resistance genes among <i>S. maltophilia</i> isolates.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 94 clinical <i>S. maltophilia</i> isolates were recovered from four tertiary-care hospitals in Iran between 2021 and 2022. The presence of the selected antibiotic-resistance genes and biofilm-forming genes was examined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The ability of biofilm formation was examined by microtiter plate assay. The Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was used to evaluate the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), levofloxacin, and minocycline resistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>S. maltophilia</i> is mainly isolated from bloodstream infections. Notably, 98.93% of isolates were biofilm producers, of which 19.35%, 60.22%, and 20.43% produced strong, moderate, and weak biofilm, respectively. The frequency of biofilm genes was 100%, 97.88%, 96.80%, and 75.53% for <i>spgM, rmlA, smf</i>-1, and <i>rpfF</i>, respectively. Isolates with the genotype of <i>smf</i>-1+/<i>rmlA</i>+/<i>spgM</i>+/<i>rpfF</i>+ were mostly strong biofilm producers. Among the antibiotic-resistance genes, the <i>Smqnr, L1, and sul1</i> had the highest prevalence (76.59%, 72.34%, and 64.89), respectively. Antimicrobial susceptibility evaluation showed 1.06%, 3.19%, and 6.3% resistance to minocycline, TMP-SMX, and levofloxacin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the current study demonstrated that <i>S. maltophilia</i> isolates differ in biofilm-forming ability. Moreover, <i>smf</i>-1, <i>rmlA</i>, and <i>spgM</i> genes were presented in all strong biofilm producers. Although the overall resistance rate to the evaluated antibiotics was high, there was no statistically significant relation between antibiotic resistance and the type of biofilm.</p>","PeriodicalId":14098,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10484654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8873948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Today, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) is a major opportunistic pathogen among hospitalized or immunocompromised patients. Antibiotic-resistant clinical isolates are increasing in several parts of the world. Various antibiotic-resistance and biofilm-forming genes are identified in this bacterium. Its capacity to form biofilms is an important virulence factor that may impact antibiotic-resistance patterns. In the current study, we evaluated the biofilm-formation capacity, antibiotic-resistance profile, and prevalence of biofilm-forming genes as well as antibiotic resistance genes among S. maltophilia isolates.

Materials and methods: In this cross-sectional study, 94 clinical S. maltophilia isolates were recovered from four tertiary-care hospitals in Iran between 2021 and 2022. The presence of the selected antibiotic-resistance genes and biofilm-forming genes was examined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The ability of biofilm formation was examined by microtiter plate assay. The Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was used to evaluate the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), levofloxacin, and minocycline resistance.

Results: S. maltophilia is mainly isolated from bloodstream infections. Notably, 98.93% of isolates were biofilm producers, of which 19.35%, 60.22%, and 20.43% produced strong, moderate, and weak biofilm, respectively. The frequency of biofilm genes was 100%, 97.88%, 96.80%, and 75.53% for spgM, rmlA, smf-1, and rpfF, respectively. Isolates with the genotype of smf-1+/rmlA+/spgM+/rpfF+ were mostly strong biofilm producers. Among the antibiotic-resistance genes, the Smqnr, L1, and sul1 had the highest prevalence (76.59%, 72.34%, and 64.89), respectively. Antimicrobial susceptibility evaluation showed 1.06%, 3.19%, and 6.3% resistance to minocycline, TMP-SMX, and levofloxacin.

Conclusion: The results of the current study demonstrated that S. maltophilia isolates differ in biofilm-forming ability. Moreover, smf-1, rmlA, and spgM genes were presented in all strong biofilm producers. Although the overall resistance rate to the evaluated antibiotics was high, there was no statistically significant relation between antibiotic resistance and the type of biofilm.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌生物膜基因与抗生素耐药性的关系。
目的:今天,嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌(嗜麦芽单胞菌)是住院或免疫功能低下患者的主要条件致病菌。耐抗生素临床分离株在世界若干地区正在增加。在这种细菌中鉴定出各种抗生素抗性和生物膜形成基因。其形成生物膜的能力是可能影响抗生素耐药性模式的重要毒力因素。在目前的研究中,我们评估了嗜麦芽葡萄球菌分离株的生物膜形成能力、抗生素耐药谱、生物膜形成基因和抗生素耐药基因的流行程度。材料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,从2021年至2022年在伊朗的四家三级医院回收了94株临床嗜麦芽葡萄球菌。采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测所选耐药基因和生物膜形成基因的存在。采用微滴板法检测生物膜的形成能力。采用Kirby-Bauer圆盘扩散法评价甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)、左氧氟沙星和米诺环素的耐药性。结果:嗜麦芽葡萄球菌主要来源于血液感染。值得注意的是,98.93%的分离菌为生物膜产生菌,其中产生强、中、弱生物膜的分别为19.35%、60.22%和20.43%。spgM、rmlA、smf-1和rpfF的生物膜基因频率分别为100%、97.88%、96.80%和75.53%。具有smf-1+/rmlA+/spgM+/rpfF+基因型的菌株大多具有较强的生物膜生成能力。耐药基因中,Smqnr、L1和sul1的患病率最高,分别为76.59%、72.34%和64.89%。对米诺环素、TMP-SMX和左氧氟沙星的耐药率分别为1.06%、3.19%和6.3%。结论:本研究结果表明,嗜麦芽葡萄球菌分离株在生物膜形成能力上存在差异。此外,smf-1、rmlA和spgM基因在所有强生物膜生产者中均存在。虽然对所评估抗生素的总体耐药率较高,但抗生素耐药率与生物膜类型之间无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Microbiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies on microorganisms and their interaction with hosts and the environment. The journal covers all microbes, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, archaea, and protozoa. Basic science will be considered, as well as medical and applied research.
期刊最新文献
Bacteriuria Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Attending Ejisu Government Hospital in the Ashanti Region, Ghana. Penicillium citrinum CFAM 521 Isolated From the Amazon Region: A Novel Source of a Fibrinolytic Enzyme. Comprehensive Genome Analysis of Colistin-Only-Sensitive KPC-2 and NDM1-1-Coproducing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11 and Acinetobacter baumannii ST2 From a Critically Ill Patient With COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) of K. pneumoniae ST11 and A. baumannii ST2. Potential Target Metabolites From Gut Microbiota Against Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Pharmacology and Molecular Docking Study. Determination of Biodegradation Potential of Aspergillus niger, Candida albicans, and Acremonium sclerotigenum on Polyethylene, Polyethylene Terephthalate, and Polystyrene Microplastics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1