What makes an obsession? A systematic-review and meta-analysis on the specific characteristics of intrusive cognitions in OCD in comparison with other clinical and non-clinical populations

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical psychology & psychotherapy Pub Date : 2023-07-22 DOI:10.1002/cpp.2887
Jean-Sébastien Audet, Lysandre Bourguignon, Frederick Aardema
{"title":"What makes an obsession? A systematic-review and meta-analysis on the specific characteristics of intrusive cognitions in OCD in comparison with other clinical and non-clinical populations","authors":"Jean-Sébastien Audet,&nbsp;Lysandre Bourguignon,&nbsp;Frederick Aardema","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5th ed</i>. defines obsessions in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) as frequent, persistent, intrusive, unwanted thoughts that provoke anxiety and distress and lead to attempts to neutralize them with either thoughts or actions. However, no systematic review has yet evaluated characteristics that are specific to obsessions occurring in OCD. The aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the specific features of obsessions occurring in OCD by comparing them to both obsessionally and non-obsessionally-themed intrusions in non-clinical and other clinical populations. Based on a registered protocol, 832 records were found, of which 15 were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, with a total of 1891 participants. Obsessionally-themed intrusions that occur among those with OCD caused more distress, guilt, negative emotion and interference as compared to similarly-themed intrusions that occur within the general population. The distinction between obsessionally-themed intrusions among those with OCD as compared to those occurring in anxiety and depressive disorder primarily revolves around a higher level of persistence, pervasiveness and distress associated with their occurrence. Further, unacceptability, uncontrollability, ego-dystonicity, alienness, guilt, the form of the intrusion, association with the self and lack of any basis in reality also differentiates between obsessions and intrusions occurring in other disorders. Obsessions share many characteristics with thoughts occurring in other disorders and can be distinguished using a combination of characteristics specific to individual disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"30 6","pages":"1446-1463"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2887","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 5th ed. defines obsessions in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) as frequent, persistent, intrusive, unwanted thoughts that provoke anxiety and distress and lead to attempts to neutralize them with either thoughts or actions. However, no systematic review has yet evaluated characteristics that are specific to obsessions occurring in OCD. The aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the specific features of obsessions occurring in OCD by comparing them to both obsessionally and non-obsessionally-themed intrusions in non-clinical and other clinical populations. Based on a registered protocol, 832 records were found, of which 15 were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, with a total of 1891 participants. Obsessionally-themed intrusions that occur among those with OCD caused more distress, guilt, negative emotion and interference as compared to similarly-themed intrusions that occur within the general population. The distinction between obsessionally-themed intrusions among those with OCD as compared to those occurring in anxiety and depressive disorder primarily revolves around a higher level of persistence, pervasiveness and distress associated with their occurrence. Further, unacceptability, uncontrollability, ego-dystonicity, alienness, guilt, the form of the intrusion, association with the self and lack of any basis in reality also differentiates between obsessions and intrusions occurring in other disorders. Obsessions share many characteristics with thoughts occurring in other disorders and can be distinguished using a combination of characteristics specific to individual disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
怎样才算强迫症?与其他临床和非临床人群相比,强迫症患者侵入性认知的具体特征的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
诊断与统计手册》第 5 版将强迫症(OCD)中的强迫症定义为频繁、持续、侵入性、不想要的想法,这些想法会引发焦虑和痛苦,并导致试图用想法或行动来中和这些想法。然而,目前还没有系统性综述对强迫症强迫症所特有的特征进行评估。本次系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是通过比较非临床人群和其他临床人群中以强迫症为主题的强迫症和以非强迫症为主题的侵入,研究强迫症强迫症的具体特征。根据注册协议,我们找到了 832 份记录,其中 15 份被纳入系统综述和荟萃分析,共有 1891 名参与者。与普通人群中出现的类似主题入侵相比,强迫症患者出现的强迫主题入侵会造成更多的困扰、负罪感、负面情绪和干扰。与焦虑症和抑郁症的强迫症患者相比,强迫症患者的强迫症主题入侵的区别主要在于其发生的持续性、普遍性和痛苦程度更高。此外,强迫症的不可接受性、不可控性、自我强直性、异化性、负罪感、侵扰的形式、与自我的关联以及缺乏现实基础也是强迫症与其他疾病的侵扰之间的区别。强迫症与其他失调症的想法有许多共同特征,可以通过综合各失调症特有的特征加以区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
期刊最新文献
Presence and Impact of Adverse Childhood Experiences and Reflective Functioning on Aggression in Adults With Antisocial Behaviour Do Therapists Know When Their Clients Deteriorate? An Investigation of Therapists' Ability to Estimate and Predict Client Change During and After Psychotherapy Resilience and Religious Coping in Libyan Survivors of Hurricane Daniele If You Give a Therapist a Network: A Qualitative Analysis of Therapists' Reactions to Their Patients' EMA-Based Network Models Intrusive Thoughts and Images in Health Anxiety: Rates, Characteristics, and Responses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1