Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Mortality: Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH JMIR Public Health and Surveillance Pub Date : 2023-09-05 DOI:10.2196/44073
Wenzhen Li, Dajie Chen, Ying Peng, Zuxun Lu, Mei-Po Kwan, Lap Ah Tse
{"title":"Association Between Metabolic Syndrome and Mortality: Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Wenzhen Li,&nbsp;Dajie Chen,&nbsp;Ying Peng,&nbsp;Zuxun Lu,&nbsp;Mei-Po Kwan,&nbsp;Lap Ah Tse","doi":"10.2196/44073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a common metabolic disorder that results from the increasing prevalence of obesity, which has been an increasing concern in recent years. Previous evidence indicated that MetS was associated with mortality; however, different definitions of MetS were used. In 2005, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III updated the definition of MetS, which has since been widely adopted. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a novel study among other populations and countries with a larger sample size using the updated definition of MetS and death code to examine the association of MetS with all-cause and cause-specific mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to examine the associations of MetS with all-cause and cause-specific mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 36,414 adults were included in this study, using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III (1988-1994) and the continuous NHANES (1999-2014) in the United States. Death outcomes were ascertained by linkage to National Death Index records through December 31, 2015. MetS was defined by the NCEP ATP III-2005 criterion. Complex survey design factors including sample weights, clustering, and stratification were considered for all analyses with instructions for using NHANES data. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for mortality from all causes, heart disease, diabetes, and cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed 8494 deaths during the 16.71 years of follow-up. Compared with those without MetS, individuals with MetS were associated with a significantly elevated multiadjusted HR of 1.24 (95% CI 1.16-1.33), 1.44 (95% CI 1.25-1.66), and 5.15 (95% CI 3.15-8.43) for all cause, heart diseases, and diabetes mellitus, respectively, whereas no significant association was found for cancer mortality (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.95-1.43).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study provides additional evidence that MetS and its components are significantly associated with all-cause, heart disease, and diabetes mortality, but not with cancer mortality. Health care professionals should pay more attention to MetS and its individual component.</p>","PeriodicalId":14765,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Public Health and Surveillance","volume":"9 ","pages":"e44073"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Public Health and Surveillance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/44073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a common metabolic disorder that results from the increasing prevalence of obesity, which has been an increasing concern in recent years. Previous evidence indicated that MetS was associated with mortality; however, different definitions of MetS were used. In 2005, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III updated the definition of MetS, which has since been widely adopted. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a novel study among other populations and countries with a larger sample size using the updated definition of MetS and death code to examine the association of MetS with all-cause and cause-specific mortality.

Objective: We aimed to examine the associations of MetS with all-cause and cause-specific mortality.

Methods: A total of 36,414 adults were included in this study, using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III (1988-1994) and the continuous NHANES (1999-2014) in the United States. Death outcomes were ascertained by linkage to National Death Index records through December 31, 2015. MetS was defined by the NCEP ATP III-2005 criterion. Complex survey design factors including sample weights, clustering, and stratification were considered for all analyses with instructions for using NHANES data. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for mortality from all causes, heart disease, diabetes, and cancer.

Results: We observed 8494 deaths during the 16.71 years of follow-up. Compared with those without MetS, individuals with MetS were associated with a significantly elevated multiadjusted HR of 1.24 (95% CI 1.16-1.33), 1.44 (95% CI 1.25-1.66), and 5.15 (95% CI 3.15-8.43) for all cause, heart diseases, and diabetes mellitus, respectively, whereas no significant association was found for cancer mortality (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.95-1.43).

Conclusions: Our study provides additional evidence that MetS and its components are significantly associated with all-cause, heart disease, and diabetes mortality, but not with cancer mortality. Health care professionals should pay more attention to MetS and its individual component.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代谢综合征与死亡率的相关性:前瞻性队列研究。
背景:代谢综合征(MetS)是一种常见的代谢紊乱,由肥胖的日益流行引起,近年来肥胖越来越引起人们的关注。先前的证据表明MetS与死亡率有关;然而,使用了MetS的不同定义。2005年,国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)成人治疗小组(ATP)III更新了代谢综合征的定义,该定义已被广泛采用。因此,有必要在样本量较大的其他人群和国家中进行一项新的研究,使用MetS的最新定义和死亡代码来检查MetS与全因和特定原因死亡率的关系。目的:我们旨在研究代谢综合征与全因死亡率和病因特异性死亡率的关系。方法:本研究共纳入36414名成年人,使用美国国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)III(1988-1994)和连续NHANES(1999-2014)的数据。死亡结果通过与截至2015年12月31日的国家死亡指数记录相关联来确定。MetS由NCEP ATP III-2005标准定义。所有分析都考虑了复杂的调查设计因素,包括样本权重、聚类和分层,并给出了使用NHANES数据的说明。Cox比例风险模型用于估计各种原因、心脏病、糖尿病和癌症死亡率的风险比(HR)和95%CI。结果:在16.71年的随访中,我们观察到8494例死亡。与那些没有MetS的人相比,患有MetS的个体在各种原因、心脏病和糖尿病方面的多因素调整HR分别显著升高,分别为1.24(95%CI 1.16-1.33)、1.44(95%CI 1.25-1.66)和5.15(95%CI 3.15-8.43),而未发现与癌症死亡率显著相关(HR 1.17,95%CI 0.95-1.43)。结论:我们的研究提供了额外的证据,证明MetS及其成分与全因、心脏病和糖尿病死亡率显著相关,但与癌症死亡率无关。医疗保健专业人员应该更多地关注MetS及其个人组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Public Health & Surveillance (JPHS) is a renowned scholarly journal indexed on PubMed. It follows a rigorous peer-review process and covers a wide range of disciplines. The journal distinguishes itself by its unique focus on the intersection of technology and innovation in the field of public health. JPHS delves into diverse topics such as public health informatics, surveillance systems, rapid reports, participatory epidemiology, infodemiology, infoveillance, digital disease detection, digital epidemiology, electronic public health interventions, mass media and social media campaigns, health communication, and emerging population health analysis systems and tools.
期刊最新文献
Identifying Data-Driven Clinical Subgroups for Cervical Cancer Prevention With Machine Learning: Population-Based, External, and Diagnostic Validation Study. Alternative Presentations of Overall and Statistical Uncertainty for Adults' Understanding of the Results of a Randomized Trial of a Public Health Intervention: Parallel Web-Based Randomized Trials. COVID-19 Testing Equity in New York City During the First 2 Years of the Pandemic: Demographic Analysis of Free Testing Data. Migrant-Local Differences in the Relationship Between Oral Health, Social Support, and Loneliness Among Older Adults in Weifang, China: Cross-Sectional Study. Monitoring Public Health Through a Comprehensive Primary Care Database in the Netherlands: Overview of the Nivel Syndromic Surveillance System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1