Best-response dynamics, playing sequences, and convergence to equilibrium in random games.

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS International Journal of Game Theory Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s00182-023-00837-4
Torsten Heinrich, Yoojin Jang, Luca Mungo, Marco Pangallo, Alex Scott, Bassel Tarbush, Samuel Wiese
{"title":"Best-response dynamics, playing sequences, and convergence to equilibrium in random games.","authors":"Torsten Heinrich,&nbsp;Yoojin Jang,&nbsp;Luca Mungo,&nbsp;Marco Pangallo,&nbsp;Alex Scott,&nbsp;Bassel Tarbush,&nbsp;Samuel Wiese","doi":"10.1007/s00182-023-00837-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We analyze the performance of the best-response dynamic across all normal-form games using a random games approach. The playing sequence-the order in which players update their actions-is essentially irrelevant in determining whether the dynamic converges to a Nash equilibrium in certain classes of games (e.g. in potential games) but, when evaluated across all possible games, convergence to equilibrium depends on the playing sequence in an extreme way. Our main asymptotic result shows that the best-response dynamic converges to a pure Nash equilibrium in a vanishingly small fraction of all (large) games when players take turns according to a fixed cyclic order. By contrast, when the playing sequence is random, the dynamic converges to a pure Nash equilibrium if one exists in almost all (large) games.</p>","PeriodicalId":14155,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Game Theory","volume":"52 3","pages":"703-735"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10494490/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00182-023-00837-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We analyze the performance of the best-response dynamic across all normal-form games using a random games approach. The playing sequence-the order in which players update their actions-is essentially irrelevant in determining whether the dynamic converges to a Nash equilibrium in certain classes of games (e.g. in potential games) but, when evaluated across all possible games, convergence to equilibrium depends on the playing sequence in an extreme way. Our main asymptotic result shows that the best-response dynamic converges to a pure Nash equilibrium in a vanishingly small fraction of all (large) games when players take turns according to a fixed cyclic order. By contrast, when the playing sequence is random, the dynamic converges to a pure Nash equilibrium if one exists in almost all (large) games.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机博弈中的最佳反应动力学、游戏序列和趋同均衡。
我们使用随机博弈方法分析了所有正规博弈中最佳响应动态的表现。游戏顺序,即玩家更新行动的顺序,在决定动态是否在某些类型的游戏(如潜在游戏)中收敛到纳什均衡时,本质上是无关紧要的,但是,当评估所有可能的游戏时,收敛到均衡取决于极端的游戏顺序。我们的主要渐近结果表明,当参与者按照固定的循环顺序轮流时,在所有(大型)博弈的极小部分中,最佳响应动态收敛于纯纳什均衡。相比之下,当游戏序列是随机的,动态收敛到一个纯纳什均衡,如果一个存在于几乎所有(大型)博弈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Game Theory
International Journal of Game Theory 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Game Theory is devoted to game theory and its applications. It publishes original research making significant contributions from a methodological, conceptual or mathematical point of view. Survey articles may also be considered if especially useful for the field.
期刊最新文献
Buyers’ welfare maximizing auction design: comment The Shapley value in positional queueing problems Semidefinite games Vexing vexillological logic Finitely additive behavioral strategies: when do they induce an unambiguous expected payoff?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1