Ben Lyall, Anthony K J Smith, Katie Attwell, Mark D M David McGregor Davis
{"title":"Antibiotics online: digital pharmacy marketplaces and pastiche medicine.","authors":"Ben Lyall, Anthony K J Smith, Katie Attwell, Mark D M David McGregor Davis","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2022-012574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The internet enables access to information and the purchasing of medical products of various quality and legality. Research and regulatory attention have focused on the trafficking of illicit substances, potential physical harms of pharmaceuticals, and possibilities like financial fraud. However, there is far less attention paid to antibiotics and other antimicrobials used to treat infections. With online pharmacies affording greater access, caution around antibiotic use is needed due to the increasing health risks of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The COVID-19 pandemic has helped to normalise digital healthcare and contactless prescribing, amplifying the need for caution. Little is known of how antibiotics are consumed via digital pharmacy and implications for AMR prevention. To expand insight for AMR prevention policy in Australia and internationally, we use digital ethnographic methods to explore how digital pharmacies function in the context of health advice and policy related to AMR, commonly described as antimicrobial stewardship. We find that digital pharmacy marketplaces constitute 'pastiche medicine'. They curate access to pharmaceutical and information products that emulate biomedical authority combined with emphasis on the 'self-assembly' of healthcare. Pastiche medicine empowers the consumer but borrows biomedical expertise about antibiotics, untethering these goods from critical medicine information, and from AMR prevention strategies. We reflect on the implications of pastiche medicine for AMR policy, what the antibiotics case contributes to wider critical scholarship on digital pharmacy, and how medical humanities research might consider researching online consumption in future.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2022-012574","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The internet enables access to information and the purchasing of medical products of various quality and legality. Research and regulatory attention have focused on the trafficking of illicit substances, potential physical harms of pharmaceuticals, and possibilities like financial fraud. However, there is far less attention paid to antibiotics and other antimicrobials used to treat infections. With online pharmacies affording greater access, caution around antibiotic use is needed due to the increasing health risks of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The COVID-19 pandemic has helped to normalise digital healthcare and contactless prescribing, amplifying the need for caution. Little is known of how antibiotics are consumed via digital pharmacy and implications for AMR prevention. To expand insight for AMR prevention policy in Australia and internationally, we use digital ethnographic methods to explore how digital pharmacies function in the context of health advice and policy related to AMR, commonly described as antimicrobial stewardship. We find that digital pharmacy marketplaces constitute 'pastiche medicine'. They curate access to pharmaceutical and information products that emulate biomedical authority combined with emphasis on the 'self-assembly' of healthcare. Pastiche medicine empowers the consumer but borrows biomedical expertise about antibiotics, untethering these goods from critical medicine information, and from AMR prevention strategies. We reflect on the implications of pastiche medicine for AMR policy, what the antibiotics case contributes to wider critical scholarship on digital pharmacy, and how medical humanities research might consider researching online consumption in future.
通过互联网可以获取信息,购买不同质量和合法性的医药产品。研究和监管关注的重点是非法物质的贩运、药品对身体的潜在危害以及金融欺诈等可能性。然而,对用于治疗感染的抗生素和其他抗菌药的关注却少得多。网上药店提供了更多的获取途径,但由于抗菌药耐药性 (AMR) 带来的健康风险越来越大,因此需要谨慎使用抗生素。COVID-19 大流行有助于使数字医疗和非接触式处方正常化,从而更加需要谨慎。人们对抗生素如何通过数字药房消费以及对预防 AMR 的影响知之甚少。为了扩大对澳大利亚和国际 AMR 预防政策的了解,我们使用数字人种学方法来探讨数字药房如何在与 AMR(通常称为抗菌药物管理)相关的健康建议和政策背景下发挥作用。我们发现,数字药房市场构成了 "拼贴医学"。它们提供的药品和信息产品仿效生物医学权威,强调医疗保健的 "自我组装"。伪造医药赋予了消费者权力,但借用了生物医学中有关抗生素的专业知识,使这些产品与关键医学信息和急性呼吸道感染预防策略脱节。我们思考了 "赝品医学 "对 AMR 政策的影响、抗生素案例对更广泛的数字药学批判性学术研究的贡献,以及医学人文研究如何考虑在未来研究在线消费。
期刊介绍:
Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.