Exploring the GP-patient relationship: a historical narration.

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Medical Humanities Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1136/medhum-2024-012916
Emma Ladds
{"title":"Exploring the GP-patient relationship: a historical narration.","authors":"Emma Ladds","doi":"10.1136/medhum-2024-012916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between patients and their doctor is a fundamental concept-particularly within general practice. Many patients and general practitioners (GPs) have a 'common-sense' recognition of the interpersonal connection, usually over time, that makes a relationship meaningful. GPs have consistently striven to emphasise the importance of this connection. While much research has explored the components and influences affecting intersubjective connections, less attention has focused on how the historical, professional, sociopolitical and philosophical contexts have influenced their experience and portrayal. However, recent claims of a crisis in UK general practice resulting from declining relational encounters suggest these are important considerations. In this paper, episodic narration (chronicling) is used to explore five different ages of UK general practice: the emergent period (1815-1948); the expansion of coverage (1949-1965); the professionalisation of general practice (1966-1988); the age of marketisation and neoliberalisation (1989-2004); and the age of technology and fragmentation (2004-present day). A range of sources illustrate micro and macro viewpoints within each period-personal reflections, professional publications, political directives or policies, and representations from the fields of art and literature. This allows for a deeper exploration of contextual influences on the codification and enactment of GP-patient relationships over time and their interpretation and perception. Significant epidemiological and biomedical realities and their respective social interpretation(s), the socioprofessional nature of the GP, that is, their role, societal position and framework of practice, and broader sociopolitical and philosophical factors are explored. Ideological frameworks (from socialism to free market policies and neoliberalism) were particularly important. These determine approaches to funding, service/provider structures, and regulation and governance, which incentivise, enable, or inhibit choices and behaviours among individuals and society, thus impacting the enactment of the GP-patient relationship. If meaningful GP-patient connections are valuable and desirable-as GPs consistently claim they are-we require an honest discussion about the contexts necessary to enable and retain them.</p>","PeriodicalId":46435,"journal":{"name":"Medical Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2024-012916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relationship between patients and their doctor is a fundamental concept-particularly within general practice. Many patients and general practitioners (GPs) have a 'common-sense' recognition of the interpersonal connection, usually over time, that makes a relationship meaningful. GPs have consistently striven to emphasise the importance of this connection. While much research has explored the components and influences affecting intersubjective connections, less attention has focused on how the historical, professional, sociopolitical and philosophical contexts have influenced their experience and portrayal. However, recent claims of a crisis in UK general practice resulting from declining relational encounters suggest these are important considerations. In this paper, episodic narration (chronicling) is used to explore five different ages of UK general practice: the emergent period (1815-1948); the expansion of coverage (1949-1965); the professionalisation of general practice (1966-1988); the age of marketisation and neoliberalisation (1989-2004); and the age of technology and fragmentation (2004-present day). A range of sources illustrate micro and macro viewpoints within each period-personal reflections, professional publications, political directives or policies, and representations from the fields of art and literature. This allows for a deeper exploration of contextual influences on the codification and enactment of GP-patient relationships over time and their interpretation and perception. Significant epidemiological and biomedical realities and their respective social interpretation(s), the socioprofessional nature of the GP, that is, their role, societal position and framework of practice, and broader sociopolitical and philosophical factors are explored. Ideological frameworks (from socialism to free market policies and neoliberalism) were particularly important. These determine approaches to funding, service/provider structures, and regulation and governance, which incentivise, enable, or inhibit choices and behaviours among individuals and society, thus impacting the enactment of the GP-patient relationship. If meaningful GP-patient connections are valuable and desirable-as GPs consistently claim they are-we require an honest discussion about the contexts necessary to enable and retain them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索全科医生与患者的关系:历史叙事。
患者与医生之间的关系是一个基本概念,尤其是在全科医学领域。许多患者和全科医生(GPs)都 "常识性 "地认识到人与人之间的联系,这种联系通常会随着时间的推移而发生变化,从而使关系变得更有意义。全科医生一直努力强调这种联系的重要性。虽然许多研究探讨了影响主体间联系的因素和影响,但较少关注历史、专业、社会政治和哲学背景如何影响其经验和描述。然而,最近关于英国全科医生因关系接触减少而面临危机的说法表明,这些都是重要的考虑因素。本文采用插叙(编年史)的方式来探讨英国全科医学的五个不同时代:兴起时期(1815-1948 年);覆盖范围扩大时期(1949-1965 年);全科医学职业化时期(1966-1988 年);市场化和新自由主义时代(1989-2004 年);以及技术和碎片化时代(2004 年至今)。一系列资料说明了每个时期的微观和宏观观点--个人反思、专业出版物、政治指令或政策,以及艺术和文学领域的表述。这有助于深入探讨全科医生与患者之间的关系在不同时期的编纂和发展过程中受到的环境影响,以及对这种关系的解释和认知。我们探讨了重要的流行病学和生物医学现实及其各自的社会解释、全科医生的社会专业性质(即他们的角色、社会地位和实践框架)以及更广泛的社会政治和哲学因素。意识形态框架(从社会主义到自由市场政策和新自由主义)尤为重要。这些因素决定了筹资方式、服务/提供者结构以及监管和治理,从而激励、促成或抑制个人和社会的选择和行为,进而影响全科医生与患者关系的建立。如果全科医生与患者之间有意义的联系是有价值和可取的--正如全科医生一直声称的那样--那么我们就需要对促成和保持这种联系所需的环境进行坦诚的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Humanities
Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.
期刊最新文献
Imagining alternative futures with augmentative and alternative communication: a manifesto. Why robot embodiment matters: questions of disability, race and intersectionality in the design of social robots. Correspondence on "Dating apps as health allies? Examining the opportunities and challenges of dating apps as partners in public health" by Garcia-Iglesias et al. Exploring the GP-patient relationship: a historical narration. Stories of chronic illness: exploring qualitative data through poetic transcriptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1