Flows and Practices: Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in African Contexts

Lyla Mehta, Synne Movik
{"title":"Flows and Practices: Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in African Contexts","authors":"Lyla Mehta,&nbsp;Synne Movik","doi":"10.1111/j.2040-0209.2014.00438.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>For the past two decades, Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) has been considered the dominant paradigm in water resources. It is the flagship project of supranational global bodies such as the Global Water Partnership (GWP) and has also been actively promoted by multilateral and regional development banks (e.g. the World Bank; African Development Bank) as well as bilateral donor agencies which make it out to be the panacea to address the water management crisis in the global south, leading to major water reforms programmes and the rewriting of national policies drawing on IWRM principles in a range of countries in southern Africa. This paper offers a conceptual approach for studying the evolution, spread and uptake of IWRM. It then turns to the actual practices, and how IWRM has been interpreted in multiple ways, and how it aligns with existing patterns of legal pluralism. The paper proposes a conceptual framework that builds on three main themes, the <i>flow</i> of IWRM as an idea in international and national fora, the <i>translation and adoption</i> of IWRM into national contexts, and the <i>practice</i> of IWRM in local contexts. In constructing such a conceptual framework, we draw on several strands of thought, including policy discourse, network and regime theory (<i>flows</i>), translation theory and donor-recipient studies (<i>translation and adoption</i>) and theories of legal pluralism, institutional bricolage and agency (<i>practices</i>). With this framework we hope it will be possible to trace the spread, transformation and uptake of IWRM across global, national and local scales, to unearth the convergences and divergences in understandings and applications of the notion of IWRM raising challenges and issues for debate and further research and key actors operating at different levels mediating/moderating/articulating the travel of policy ideas. The latter may create generic insights on policy processes and practice that goes beyond the concept of IWRM and the water world. This framework will guide the critical study of various interpretations and challenges of how policy ideas travel at multiple political and geographical scales, from macro political forums to localised arenas and communities, speaking to wider themes such as policy translation and uptake and the politics of the development process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100618,"journal":{"name":"IDS Working Papers","volume":"2014 438","pages":"1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2014.00438.x","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDS Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2014.00438.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

For the past two decades, Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) has been considered the dominant paradigm in water resources. It is the flagship project of supranational global bodies such as the Global Water Partnership (GWP) and has also been actively promoted by multilateral and regional development banks (e.g. the World Bank; African Development Bank) as well as bilateral donor agencies which make it out to be the panacea to address the water management crisis in the global south, leading to major water reforms programmes and the rewriting of national policies drawing on IWRM principles in a range of countries in southern Africa. This paper offers a conceptual approach for studying the evolution, spread and uptake of IWRM. It then turns to the actual practices, and how IWRM has been interpreted in multiple ways, and how it aligns with existing patterns of legal pluralism. The paper proposes a conceptual framework that builds on three main themes, the flow of IWRM as an idea in international and national fora, the translation and adoption of IWRM into national contexts, and the practice of IWRM in local contexts. In constructing such a conceptual framework, we draw on several strands of thought, including policy discourse, network and regime theory (flows), translation theory and donor-recipient studies (translation and adoption) and theories of legal pluralism, institutional bricolage and agency (practices). With this framework we hope it will be possible to trace the spread, transformation and uptake of IWRM across global, national and local scales, to unearth the convergences and divergences in understandings and applications of the notion of IWRM raising challenges and issues for debate and further research and key actors operating at different levels mediating/moderating/articulating the travel of policy ideas. The latter may create generic insights on policy processes and practice that goes beyond the concept of IWRM and the water world. This framework will guide the critical study of various interpretations and challenges of how policy ideas travel at multiple political and geographical scales, from macro political forums to localised arenas and communities, speaking to wider themes such as policy translation and uptake and the politics of the development process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流动与实践:非洲环境下的综合水资源管理(IWRM
在过去的二十年里,水资源综合管理(IWRM)一直被认为是水资源管理的主导范式。它是全球水伙伴关系(GWP)等超国家全球性机构的旗舰项目,也得到了多边和区域开发银行(如世界银行;非洲开发银行)以及双边捐助机构,这些机构认为它是解决全球南方水管理危机的灵丹妙药,导致南部非洲一系列国家根据水资源综合管理原则制定了重大的水改革方案和国家政策。本文提出了一种研究综合水资源管理演变、传播和吸收的概念方法。然后,它转向实际实践,以及IWRM如何以多种方式解释,以及它如何与现有的法律多元化模式保持一致。本文提出了一个基于三个主题的概念框架,即IWRM作为一种理念在国际和国家论坛上的流动,IWRM在国家背景下的翻译和采用,以及IWRM在地方背景下的实践。在构建这样一个概念框架时,我们借鉴了几条思路,包括政策话语、网络和制度理论(流动)、翻译理论和捐赠者-接受者研究(翻译和采用)以及法律多元主义、制度拼凑和代理(实践)理论。有了这个框架,我们希望有可能追踪IWRM在全球、国家和地方范围内的传播、转变和吸收,揭示IWRM概念的理解和应用中的趋同和分歧,为辩论和进一步研究提出挑战和问题,并在不同层面上运作的关键行动者调解/缓和/阐明政策思想的传播。后者可能产生关于政策进程和实践的一般性见解,超越水资源综合管理和水世界的概念。该框架将指导对政策思想如何在多个政治和地理尺度上传播的各种解释和挑战的批判性研究,从宏观政治论坛到局部领域和社区,涉及更广泛的主题,如政策翻译和吸收以及发展过程的政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reducing Child Undernutrition: Past Drivers and Priorities for the Post-MDG Era An Economics of Wellbeing: What Would Economics Look Like if it were Focused on Human Wellbeing? Reimagining Development 3.0 for a Changing Planet Who Wants to Farm? Youth Aspirations, Opportunities and Rising Food Prices Flows and Practices: Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in African Contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1