Preliminary clinical testing to inform development of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for Families (CPOT-Fam).

Anmol Shahid, Bonnie G Sept, Victoria S Owen, Corson Johnstone, Rameiya Paramalingam, Stephana J Moss, Rebecca Brundin-Mather, Karla D Krewulak, Andrea Soo, Jeanna Parsons-Leigh, Céline Gélinas, Kirsten M Fiest, Henry T Stelfox
{"title":"Preliminary clinical testing to inform development of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for Families (CPOT-Fam).","authors":"Anmol Shahid,&nbsp;Bonnie G Sept,&nbsp;Victoria S Owen,&nbsp;Corson Johnstone,&nbsp;Rameiya Paramalingam,&nbsp;Stephana J Moss,&nbsp;Rebecca Brundin-Mather,&nbsp;Karla D Krewulak,&nbsp;Andrea Soo,&nbsp;Jeanna Parsons-Leigh,&nbsp;Céline Gélinas,&nbsp;Kirsten M Fiest,&nbsp;Henry T Stelfox","doi":"10.1080/24740527.2023.2235399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) cannot communicate. For these patients, family caregivers (family members/close friends) could assist in pain assessment. We previously adapted the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) for family caregiver use (CPOT-Fam). In this study, we conducted preliminary clinical evaluation of the CPOT-Fam to inform further tool development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For preliminary testing, we collected (1) pain assessments of patients in the ICU from family caregivers (CPOT-Fam) and nurses (CPOT) and determined the degree of agreement (kappa coefficient, κ) and (2) collected openended feedback on the CPOT-Fam from family caregivers. For refinement, we used preliminary testing data to refine the CPOT-Fam with a multidisciplinary working group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We assessed agreement between family caregiver and nurse pain scores for 29 patients. Binary agreement (κ) between CPOT-Fam and CPOT item scores (scores ≥2 considered indicative of significant pain) was fair, κ = 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.69). Agreement was highest for the CPOT-Fam items ventilator compliance/vocalization (weighted κ = 0.48, 95% CI 0.15-0.80) and lowest for muscle tension (weighted κ = 0.10, 95% [CI] -0.17 to 0.20). Most participants (<i>n</i> = 19; 69.0%) reported a very positive experience using the CPOT-Fam, describing it as \"good\" and \"easy-to-use/clear/straightforward.\" We iteratively refined the CPOT-Fam over five cycles using the data collected until no further revisions were suggested.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary clinical testing suggests that family involvement in pain assessment in the ICU is well perceived. The CPOT-Fam has been further refined and is now ready for clinical pilot testing to determine its feasibility and acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":53214,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","volume":"7 2","pages":"2235399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10503446/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Pain-Revue Canadienne de la Douleur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24740527.2023.2235399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Many patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) cannot communicate. For these patients, family caregivers (family members/close friends) could assist in pain assessment. We previously adapted the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) for family caregiver use (CPOT-Fam). In this study, we conducted preliminary clinical evaluation of the CPOT-Fam to inform further tool development.

Methods: For preliminary testing, we collected (1) pain assessments of patients in the ICU from family caregivers (CPOT-Fam) and nurses (CPOT) and determined the degree of agreement (kappa coefficient, κ) and (2) collected openended feedback on the CPOT-Fam from family caregivers. For refinement, we used preliminary testing data to refine the CPOT-Fam with a multidisciplinary working group.

Results: We assessed agreement between family caregiver and nurse pain scores for 29 patients. Binary agreement (κ) between CPOT-Fam and CPOT item scores (scores ≥2 considered indicative of significant pain) was fair, κ = 0.43 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.69). Agreement was highest for the CPOT-Fam items ventilator compliance/vocalization (weighted κ = 0.48, 95% CI 0.15-0.80) and lowest for muscle tension (weighted κ = 0.10, 95% [CI] -0.17 to 0.20). Most participants (n = 19; 69.0%) reported a very positive experience using the CPOT-Fam, describing it as "good" and "easy-to-use/clear/straightforward." We iteratively refined the CPOT-Fam over five cycles using the data collected until no further revisions were suggested.

Conclusion: Our preliminary clinical testing suggests that family involvement in pain assessment in the ICU is well perceived. The CPOT-Fam has been further refined and is now ready for clinical pilot testing to determine its feasibility and acceptability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初步临床试验,为家庭重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT-Fam)的发展提供信息。
导读:重症监护病房(ICU)的许多患者无法沟通。对于这些患者,家庭照顾者(家庭成员/亲密朋友)可以帮助评估疼痛。我们之前改编了重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)供家庭护理人员使用(CPOT- fam)。在这项研究中,我们对CPOT-Fam进行了初步的临床评估,为进一步的工具开发提供信息。方法:为了进行初步测试,我们收集(1)家庭护理人员(CPOT- fam)和护士(CPOT)对ICU患者的疼痛评估,并确定一致性程度(kappa系数,κ);(2)收集家庭护理人员对CPOT- fam的开放式反馈。为了改进,我们与多学科工作组一起使用初步测试数据来改进CPOT-Fam。结果:我们评估了29例患者的家庭照顾者和护士疼痛评分之间的一致性。CPOT- fam和CPOT项目评分(评分≥2被认为是明显疼痛的标志)之间的二元一致性(κ)是公平的,κ = 0.43(95%可信区间[CI] 0.18-0.69)。CPOT-Fam项目呼吸机依从性/发声的一致性最高(加权κ = 0.48, 95% CI 0.15-0.80),肌肉张力的一致性最低(加权κ = 0.10, 95% [CI] -0.17至0.20)。大多数参与者(n = 19;69.0%)报告了使用CPOT-Fam的非常积极的体验,将其描述为“好”和“易于使用/清晰/直接”。我们使用收集到的数据,在五个周期内迭代地改进了CPOT-Fam,直到没有进一步的修订建议。结论:我们的初步临床试验表明,家庭参与在ICU疼痛评估是公认的。CPOT-Fam已经进一步完善,现在准备进行临床试验,以确定其可行性和可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Understanding Needs for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Management in a Northern Dene and Métis Community: A Community Based Needs Assessment. Prospective Preference Assessment for the Psilocybin for Enhanced Analgesia in Chronic nEuropathic PAIN (PEACE-PAIN) Trial. Assessing Quality of Referrals to a Community-Based Chronic Pain Clinic. The Influence of Loneliness on Pain Outcomes for Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Chronic pain experiences of immigrant Indian women in Canada: A photovoice exploration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1