Diagnostic Efficacy of Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Distinguishing Chronic Diffuse Sclerosing Osteomyelitis from Suppurative Osteomyelitis of the Mandible.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0153
Hirotaka Muraoka, Takashi Kaneda, Naohisa Hirahara, Kotaro Ito, Shunya Okada, Takumi Kondo
{"title":"Diagnostic Efficacy of Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Distinguishing Chronic Diffuse Sclerosing Osteomyelitis from Suppurative Osteomyelitis of the Mandible.","authors":"Hirotaka Muraoka,&nbsp;Takashi Kaneda,&nbsp;Naohisa Hirahara,&nbsp;Kotaro Ito,&nbsp;Shunya Okada,&nbsp;Takumi Kondo","doi":"10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (CDSO) is a non-suppurative inflammatory bone disease diagnosed based on combined clinical, histopathological, and radiological findings. Accurate diagnosis is important since CDSO is more refractory to treatment than suppurative osteomyelitis. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the quantitative assessment of CDSO to distinguish it from acute suppurative osteomyelitis (ASO) and chronic suppurative osteomyelitis (CSO) of the mandible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a retrospective cohort study design, we analyzed MRI data of 6 patients with CDSO and 34 patients with ASO and CSO. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the three groups (CDSO, ASO, and CSO groups) were calculated, and differences were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc Mann-Whitney tests with Bonferroni adjustments. We performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the ability of the ADC to predict CDSO. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean ADCs in the CDSO, ASO, and CSO groups were 1.22 ± 0.04 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, 1.28 ± 0.08 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, and 1.06 ± 0.09 × 10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, respectively. Significant differences were observed between the ASO and CSO groups (P < 0.001) and CSO and CDSO groups (P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between the ASO and CDSO groups (P = 0.21). The ROC analysis revealed a cut-off ADC value of 1.19 for distinguishing the CSO group from the CDSO group. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the ROC curve were 1.0, 0.92, 0, 95, and 0.94, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that ADC may be useful in distinguishing CDSO from mandibular suppurative osteomyelitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18119,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","volume":"22 3","pages":"283-288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bf/29/mrms-22-283.PMC10449550.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.mp.2021-0153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Chronic diffuse sclerosing osteomyelitis (CDSO) is a non-suppurative inflammatory bone disease diagnosed based on combined clinical, histopathological, and radiological findings. Accurate diagnosis is important since CDSO is more refractory to treatment than suppurative osteomyelitis. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the quantitative assessment of CDSO to distinguish it from acute suppurative osteomyelitis (ASO) and chronic suppurative osteomyelitis (CSO) of the mandible.

Methods: Using a retrospective cohort study design, we analyzed MRI data of 6 patients with CDSO and 34 patients with ASO and CSO. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the three groups (CDSO, ASO, and CSO groups) were calculated, and differences were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc Mann-Whitney tests with Bonferroni adjustments. We performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the ability of the ADC to predict CDSO. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean ADCs in the CDSO, ASO, and CSO groups were 1.22 ± 0.04 × 10-3 mm2/s, 1.28 ± 0.08 × 10-3 mm2/s, and 1.06 ± 0.09 × 10-3 mm2/s, respectively. Significant differences were observed between the ASO and CSO groups (P < 0.001) and CSO and CDSO groups (P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between the ASO and CDSO groups (P = 0.21). The ROC analysis revealed a cut-off ADC value of 1.19 for distinguishing the CSO group from the CDSO group. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the ROC curve were 1.0, 0.92, 0, 95, and 0.94, respectively.

Conclusion: The results suggest that ADC may be useful in distinguishing CDSO from mandibular suppurative osteomyelitis.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弥散加权成像鉴别下颌骨慢性弥漫性硬化性骨髓炎与化脓性骨髓炎的诊断价值。
目的:慢性弥漫性硬化性骨髓炎(CDSO)是一种非化脓性炎症性骨病,基于临床、组织病理学和影像学检查的综合诊断。准确的诊断是很重要的,因为CDSO比化脓性骨髓炎更难治疗。本研究的目的是确定弥散加权成像(DWI)在定量评估CDSO与下颌骨急性化脓性骨髓炎(ASO)和慢性化脓性骨髓炎(CSO)鉴别中的诊断效果。方法:采用回顾性队列研究设计,分析6例CDSO患者和34例ASO合并CSO患者的MRI资料。计算三组(CDSO组、ASO组和CSO组)的平均表观扩散系数(ADC)值,采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和经Bonferroni调整的post- Mann-Whitney检验分析差异。我们进行了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以评估ADC预测CDSO的能力。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:CDSO、ASO、CSO组平均adc分别为1.22±0.04 × 10-3 mm2/s、1.28±0.08 × 10-3 mm2/s、1.06±0.09 × 10-3 mm2/s。ASO组与CSO组、CSO组与CDSO组间差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。而ASO组与CDSO组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.21)。ROC分析显示,区分CSO组和CDSO组的截止ADC值为1.19。灵敏度、特异度、准确度和ROC曲线下面积分别为1.0、0.92、0.95和0.94。结论:ADC可用于鉴别CDSO与下颌骨化脓性骨髓炎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences (MRMS or Magn Reson Med Sci) is an international journal pursuing the publication of original articles contributing to the progress of magnetic resonance in the field of biomedical sciences including technical developments and clinical applications. MRMS is an official journal of the Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (JSMRM).
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Biliary Malignancy with Measured and Calculated Ultra-high b-value Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging at 3T. Diagnostic Utility of an Adjusted DWI Lexicon Using Multiple b-values to Evaluate Breast Lesions in Combination with BI-RADS. Blockage of CSF Outflow in Rats after Deep Cervical Lymph Node Ligation Observed Using Gd-based MR Imaging. A Versatile MR Elastography Research Tool with a Modified Motion Signal-to-noise Ratio Approach. Comparison of Slab and Pencil Beam Labeling in Spin-labeled MR Imaging for Pancreatic Juice Flow Visualization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1