Computerized optical scanning of ears: An in vitro evaluation with an intraoral scanner

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.010
Mariko Hattori DDS, PhD , Sebastian B.M. Patzelt DMD, MSc, PD Dr med dent habil (PhD equiv.) , Sandra Stadler DMD , Ralf J. Kohal DMD, Prof Dr med dent habil (PhD equiv.) , Kirstin Vach PhD , Mahmoud E. Elbashti BDS, MSc, PhD , Yuka I. Sumita DDS, PhD
{"title":"Computerized optical scanning of ears: An in vitro evaluation with an intraoral scanner","authors":"Mariko Hattori DDS, PhD ,&nbsp;Sebastian B.M. Patzelt DMD, MSc, PD Dr med dent habil (PhD equiv.) ,&nbsp;Sandra Stadler DMD ,&nbsp;Ralf J. Kohal DMD, Prof Dr med dent habil (PhD equiv.) ,&nbsp;Kirstin Vach PhD ,&nbsp;Mahmoud E. Elbashti BDS, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Yuka I. Sumita DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>Making conventional facial impressions can be uncomfortable for the patient and complicated for the prosthodontist. Using facial scanners to digitize faces is an alternative approach. However, the initial costs of the equipment have prevented their widespread use in dental practice, and the accuracy of ear scanning is unclear.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the accuracy of a widely used intraoral scanner for digitizing an ear model.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>For reference, a silicone model of an ear was scanned with an industrial scanner. Then, the model was scanned 5 times with an intraoral scanner. Five conventional impressions of the model were made with a hydrocolloid impression material and poured with dental stone. The stone casts were then digitized with a desktop scanner. The data sets acquired with the 3 approaches were analyzed by using a 3-dimensional (3D) evaluation software program. Trueness and precision values were calculated for each approach. Linear mixed models with random intercepts were fitted to each sample to evaluate the effects of the impression method on mean deviations (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mean ±standard deviation trueness and precision values were 0.097 ±0.012 mm and 0.033 ±0.015 mm, respectively, for the digital scan, and 0.092 ±0.022 mm and 0.081 ±0.024 mm for the conventional impression, showing a significantly lower deviation in precision for the digital approach (<em>P</em>&lt;.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The feasibility of digitizing an ear efficiently by using the investigated intraoral scanner was demonstrated, and similar trueness and significantly better precision values were achieved than when using conventional impressions. These promising results suggest the need for clinical investigations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"132 5","pages":"Pages 1089.e1-1089.e5"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391322007077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem

Making conventional facial impressions can be uncomfortable for the patient and complicated for the prosthodontist. Using facial scanners to digitize faces is an alternative approach. However, the initial costs of the equipment have prevented their widespread use in dental practice, and the accuracy of ear scanning is unclear.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the accuracy of a widely used intraoral scanner for digitizing an ear model.

Material and methods

For reference, a silicone model of an ear was scanned with an industrial scanner. Then, the model was scanned 5 times with an intraoral scanner. Five conventional impressions of the model were made with a hydrocolloid impression material and poured with dental stone. The stone casts were then digitized with a desktop scanner. The data sets acquired with the 3 approaches were analyzed by using a 3-dimensional (3D) evaluation software program. Trueness and precision values were calculated for each approach. Linear mixed models with random intercepts were fitted to each sample to evaluate the effects of the impression method on mean deviations (α=.05).

Results

Mean ±standard deviation trueness and precision values were 0.097 ±0.012 mm and 0.033 ±0.015 mm, respectively, for the digital scan, and 0.092 ±0.022 mm and 0.081 ±0.024 mm for the conventional impression, showing a significantly lower deviation in precision for the digital approach (P<.001).

Conclusions

The feasibility of digitizing an ear efficiently by using the investigated intraoral scanner was demonstrated, and similar trueness and significantly better precision values were achieved than when using conventional impressions. These promising results suggest the need for clinical investigations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计算机光学扫描耳朵:使用口内扫描仪进行体外评估。
问题陈述:制作传统的面部印模可能会让患者感到不舒服,对修复医生来说也很复杂。使用面部扫描仪对面部进行数字化是一种替代方法。目的:这项体外研究的目的是调查广泛使用的口内扫描仪对耳朵模型进行数字化的准确性:材料:作为参考,使用工业扫描仪对硅胶耳部模型进行扫描。然后,使用口内扫描仪对该模型进行 5 次扫描。用水胶体印模材料对模型进行 5 次常规印模,然后用牙科石块浇注。然后用台式扫描仪对牙石铸模进行数字化处理。使用三维(3D)评估软件程序对这三种方法获得的数据集进行分析。计算了每种方法的真实度和精确度值。对每个样本进行随机截距线性混合模型拟合,以评估压印方法对平均偏差的影响(α=.05):结果:数字扫描的真实度和精确度平均值(±标准偏差)分别为 0.097 ±0.012 毫米和 0.033 ±0.015 毫米,传统印模的真实度和精确度平均值分别为 0.092 ±0.022 毫米和 0.081 ±0.024 毫米,显示数字方法的精确度偏差显著较低(PC结论:数字扫描耳廓的可行性与传统印模的精确度偏差有关:使用所研究的口内扫描仪对耳朵进行有效数字化的可行性得到了证实,与使用传统印模相比,获得了相似的真实度和明显更高的精度值。这些令人鼓舞的结果表明有必要进行临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
Surface properties and biofilm formation on resins for subtractively and additively manufactured fixed dental prostheses aged in artificial saliva: Effect of material type and surface finishing. Acoustic signal intensity analysis in patients with dysphonia rehabilitated with two different designs for tongue prostheses: A cross-over study. Conversion of a failing fixed implant prosthesis into an implant-retained overdenture: A clinical report. Use of a nasal obturator of computer-aided design in managing hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Mechanical and biocompatibility testing of zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics: An in vitro study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1