Acoustic signal intensity analysis in patients with dysphonia rehabilitated with two different designs for tongue prostheses: A cross-over study.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.019
Ahmed N Elsherbini, Ashraf E Eskandar
{"title":"Acoustic signal intensity analysis in patients with dysphonia rehabilitated with two different designs for tongue prostheses: A cross-over study.","authors":"Ahmed N Elsherbini, Ashraf E Eskandar","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>Studies on the significance of intensity on speech production with a tongue prosthesis are lacking, despite this being an important criterion in speech production in patients with total glossectomy.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this cross-over clinical study was to assess acoustic signal intensity and frequency in patients with total glossectomy rehabilitated with mandibular dentures with 2 different attachment designs for the tongue prosthesis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Seven participants initially received a mandibular denture with a tongue prosthesis attached using an acrylic resin plate. After a period of 3 months, the dentures were retrieved and modified by replacing the acrylic resin plate with a metal framework as an attachment to the tongue prosthesis to be used for another 3 months with no washout period. The intensity and acoustic energy frequency of acoustic signals were recorded and analyzed for both denture designs at insertion, after 1 month, and after 3 months using 2-way repeated ANOVA (α=.01). Patient satisfaction was evaluated at the end of the follow-up period using a questionnaire. Participants were asked about comfort, phonation, and deglutition ability. The McNemar test was used for all parameters (α=.01).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intensity mean ±standard deviation values for the acrylic resin plate group were 21.56 ±0.54 at insertion, 19.23 ±0.25 at 1 month, and 15.46 ±0.21 at 3 months. For the metal framework group, they were 19.05 ±0.19 at insertion, 16.88 ±0.16 at 1 month, and 13.98 ±0.09 at 3 months. The differences were statistically significant (P<.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intensity of the sound (loudness) decreased in the metal framework group, which affects the ability to increase volume in a noisy environment. Participants showed higher satisfaction with the comfort of the metal framework design compared with the acrylic resin plate design. However, participants showed higher satisfaction with the deglutition ability while using the acrylic resin plate when compared with the metal framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.10.019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: Studies on the significance of intensity on speech production with a tongue prosthesis are lacking, despite this being an important criterion in speech production in patients with total glossectomy.

Purpose: The purpose of this cross-over clinical study was to assess acoustic signal intensity and frequency in patients with total glossectomy rehabilitated with mandibular dentures with 2 different attachment designs for the tongue prosthesis.

Material and methods: Seven participants initially received a mandibular denture with a tongue prosthesis attached using an acrylic resin plate. After a period of 3 months, the dentures were retrieved and modified by replacing the acrylic resin plate with a metal framework as an attachment to the tongue prosthesis to be used for another 3 months with no washout period. The intensity and acoustic energy frequency of acoustic signals were recorded and analyzed for both denture designs at insertion, after 1 month, and after 3 months using 2-way repeated ANOVA (α=.01). Patient satisfaction was evaluated at the end of the follow-up period using a questionnaire. Participants were asked about comfort, phonation, and deglutition ability. The McNemar test was used for all parameters (α=.01).

Results: Intensity mean ±standard deviation values for the acrylic resin plate group were 21.56 ±0.54 at insertion, 19.23 ±0.25 at 1 month, and 15.46 ±0.21 at 3 months. For the metal framework group, they were 19.05 ±0.19 at insertion, 16.88 ±0.16 at 1 month, and 13.98 ±0.09 at 3 months. The differences were statistically significant (P<.01).

Conclusions: The intensity of the sound (loudness) decreased in the metal framework group, which affects the ability to increase volume in a noisy environment. Participants showed higher satisfaction with the comfort of the metal framework design compared with the acrylic resin plate design. However, participants showed higher satisfaction with the deglutition ability while using the acrylic resin plate when compared with the metal framework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用两种不同设计的舌假体进行康复治疗的发音障碍患者的声信号强度分析:交叉研究。
问题陈述:尽管强度是全全口盖切除术患者说话时的一个重要标准,但有关强度对使用舌假体说话的重要性的研究还很缺乏。目的:这项交叉临床研究的目的是评估全全口盖切除术患者在下颌义齿上使用两种不同的舌假体连接设计进行康复时的声音信号强度和频率:七名参与者最初接受下颌义齿,并使用丙烯酸树脂板连接舌修复体。3 个月后,取回假牙并对其进行改良,将丙烯酸树脂板换成金属框架,作为舌修复体的附件,再使用 3 个月,不设冲洗期。使用双向重复方差分析(α=.01)记录和分析了两种义齿设计在安装时、1 个月后和 3 个月后的声信号强度和声能频率。在随访期结束时,使用调查问卷对患者的满意度进行评估。调查内容包括舒适度、发音和脱臼能力。所有参数均采用 McNemar 检验(α=.01):丙烯酸树脂板组的强度平均值(±标准偏差)为插入时(21.56±0.54),1个月时为(19.23±0.25),3个月时为(15.46±0.21)。金属框架组的插入值为(19.05 ±0.19 ),1 个月时为(16.88 ±0.16 ),3 个月时为(13.98 ±0.09 )。差异具有统计学意义(PC 结论:金属框架组的声音强度(响度)降低,这影响了在嘈杂环境中提高音量的能力。与丙烯酸树脂板设计相比,参与者对金属框架设计的舒适度表示出更高的满意度。不过,与金属框架相比,参试者对使用丙烯酸树脂板时的排气能力表现出更高的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
Surface properties and biofilm formation on resins for subtractively and additively manufactured fixed dental prostheses aged in artificial saliva: Effect of material type and surface finishing. Acoustic signal intensity analysis in patients with dysphonia rehabilitated with two different designs for tongue prostheses: A cross-over study. Conversion of a failing fixed implant prosthesis into an implant-retained overdenture: A clinical report. Use of a nasal obturator of computer-aided design in managing hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Mechanical and biocompatibility testing of zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics: An in vitro study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1