Validity and reliability of safety behaviors questionnaire for Persian adults who stutter: A cultural perspective

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Communication Disorders Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106251
Maryam Azarinfar , Hamid Karimi , Fariba Jowkar , Bijan Shafiei
{"title":"Validity and reliability of safety behaviors questionnaire for Persian adults who stutter: A cultural perspective","authors":"Maryam Azarinfar ,&nbsp;Hamid Karimi ,&nbsp;Fariba Jowkar ,&nbsp;Bijan Shafiei","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Adults who stutter (AWS) are reported to have higher social anxiety compared to those who do not stutter. Previous studies have suggested that safety behaviors, which are cognitive or behavioral strategies used by people with anxiety to prevent negative consequences, are important factors in maintaining anxiety. However, the frequency and types of such behaviors might vary in different cultures. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop a transcultural adaptation of Safety Behaviors Questionnaire (Helgadottir et al., 2014) for Persian-speaking AWS and assess its validity and reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In the first step, the original English questionnaire was translated into Persian using the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) method. Then, 17 speech and language pathologists (SLPs) and 5 AWS evaluated all questionnaire items using Likert scales to determine face validity. Finally, 167 Persian-speaking AWS completed the questionnaire to assess its construct validity and reliability. Their responses were analyzed using factor analysis and Cronbach's Alpha.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Some items of the original questionnaire were modified or combined with other similar items after assessing the face validity of the Persian-translated questionnaire. Construct validity analysis categorized the remaining 29 questionnaire items into four factors: general avoidance, practice and control, rehearsal, and choosing safe and easy people. The high Cronbach's Alpha of 0.89 for all items confirmed the internal reliability of the Persian-translated questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion/Conclusions</h3><p>The results confirmed the psychometric characteristics of the Persian- translated version of the Safety Behaviors Questionnaire (Helgadottir et al., 2014); therefore, speech pathologists can apply it in future clinical and research settings. Similar to Australian AWS, Persian participants of this study self-reported use of various types of safety behaviors frequently.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992422000703","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Adults who stutter (AWS) are reported to have higher social anxiety compared to those who do not stutter. Previous studies have suggested that safety behaviors, which are cognitive or behavioral strategies used by people with anxiety to prevent negative consequences, are important factors in maintaining anxiety. However, the frequency and types of such behaviors might vary in different cultures. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop a transcultural adaptation of Safety Behaviors Questionnaire (Helgadottir et al., 2014) for Persian-speaking AWS and assess its validity and reliability.

Methods

In the first step, the original English questionnaire was translated into Persian using the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) method. Then, 17 speech and language pathologists (SLPs) and 5 AWS evaluated all questionnaire items using Likert scales to determine face validity. Finally, 167 Persian-speaking AWS completed the questionnaire to assess its construct validity and reliability. Their responses were analyzed using factor analysis and Cronbach's Alpha.

Results

Some items of the original questionnaire were modified or combined with other similar items after assessing the face validity of the Persian-translated questionnaire. Construct validity analysis categorized the remaining 29 questionnaire items into four factors: general avoidance, practice and control, rehearsal, and choosing safe and easy people. The high Cronbach's Alpha of 0.89 for all items confirmed the internal reliability of the Persian-translated questionnaire.

Discussion/Conclusions

The results confirmed the psychometric characteristics of the Persian- translated version of the Safety Behaviors Questionnaire (Helgadottir et al., 2014); therefore, speech pathologists can apply it in future clinical and research settings. Similar to Australian AWS, Persian participants of this study self-reported use of various types of safety behaviors frequently.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波斯语成人口吃安全行为问卷的效度与信度:文化视角
据报道,口吃的成年人比不口吃的人有更高的社交焦虑。先前的研究表明,安全行为是焦虑患者用来防止负面后果的认知或行为策略,是维持焦虑的重要因素。然而,这种行为的频率和类型在不同的文化中可能会有所不同。因此,本研究的目的是为讲波斯语的AWS开发一份跨文化改编的安全行为问卷(Helgadottir et al., 2014),并评估其效度和可靠性。方法第一步,采用国际生活质量评估(IQOLA)方法将英文问卷翻译成波斯语。然后,17名言语和语言病理学家(slp)和5名AWS使用Likert量表评估所有问卷项目,以确定面部效度。最后,167名以波斯语为母语的外籍教师完成问卷,以评估问卷的构念效度和信度。采用因子分析和Cronbach’s Alpha法对他们的反应进行分析。结果在对波斯语翻译问卷进行面效度评估后,对原问卷中的部分项目进行了修改或与其他类似项目合并。构念效度分析将其余29项问卷分为一般回避、练习与控制、预演、选择安全易得的人4个因素。所有条目的高Cronbach's Alpha值为0.89,证实了波斯语翻译问卷的内部信度。讨论/结论结果证实了波斯语翻译版安全行为问卷的心理测量特征(Helgadottir et al., 2014);因此,语言病理学家可以将其应用于未来的临床和研究环境中。与澳大利亚AWS类似,本研究的波斯参与者自我报告频繁使用各种安全行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Communication Disorders publishes original articles on topics related to disorders of speech, language and hearing. Authors are encouraged to submit reports of experimental or descriptive investigations (research articles), review articles, tutorials or discussion papers, or letters to the editor ("short communications"). Please note that we do not accept case studies unless they conform to the principles of single-subject experimental design. Special issues are published periodically on timely and clinically relevant topics.
期刊最新文献
Benefits of speech recognition in noise using remote microphones for people with typical hearing. Variability of theory of mind versus pragmatic ability in typical and atypical development Self-inefficacy's impact on well-being indices in students self-identifying with cluttering characteristics Lived experiences of children who stutter in their own voices Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1