Dopamine agonist monotherapy utilization in patients with Parkinson’s disease

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100173
Monica Frazer , Steve Arcona , Lisa Le , Rahul Sasane
{"title":"Dopamine agonist monotherapy utilization in patients with Parkinson’s disease","authors":"Monica Frazer ,&nbsp;Steve Arcona ,&nbsp;Lisa Le ,&nbsp;Rahul Sasane","doi":"10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To characterize patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who initiated dopamine agonist (DA) monotherapy, describe medication utilization and provider types, and estimate medication adherence and discontinuation rates.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective study identified patients with PD in the Optum Research Database and included those with ≥1 claim for DA or levodopa between 09/01/2012 and 12/31/2018, ≥2 PD diagnoses, commercial or Medicare Advantage Part D (MAPD) insurance, ≥40 years old, and continuous medical and pharmacy coverage ≥12 months before and after index date. A subset of patients receiving DA monotherapy was selected for this analysis. Variables were analyzed descriptively. Adherence was measured with medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC); defined as ≥0.80.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients (N = 642) had mean (SD) age of 70.2 (9.9) years, 70.6 % had MAPD coverage, and 61.7 % were male. Neurologists prescribed 64.6 % of DA monotherapy, and 56.9 % of patients had ≥2 PD diagnoses before or on the index date. Index therapy was discontinued by 44.1 % of patients, and 55.9 % persisted for 12 months without change. Mean (SD) time to discontinuation was 102 (79) days. Mean (SD) MPR for patients (n = 562) with ≥2 fills was 0.84 (0.2); 70.3 % were MPR adherent. Mean (SD) PDC for all 642 patients was 0.66 (0.3); 50.5 % were PDC adherent.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Adherence and continuation of therapy were suboptimal, which could translate into poor patient outcomes. Future studies could provide insights on the impact of low adherence and persistence with DA monotherapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33691,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/84/a3/main.PMC9842678.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590112522000445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To characterize patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) who initiated dopamine agonist (DA) monotherapy, describe medication utilization and provider types, and estimate medication adherence and discontinuation rates.

Methods

Retrospective study identified patients with PD in the Optum Research Database and included those with ≥1 claim for DA or levodopa between 09/01/2012 and 12/31/2018, ≥2 PD diagnoses, commercial or Medicare Advantage Part D (MAPD) insurance, ≥40 years old, and continuous medical and pharmacy coverage ≥12 months before and after index date. A subset of patients receiving DA monotherapy was selected for this analysis. Variables were analyzed descriptively. Adherence was measured with medication possession ratio (MPR) and proportion of days covered (PDC); defined as ≥0.80.

Results

Patients (N = 642) had mean (SD) age of 70.2 (9.9) years, 70.6 % had MAPD coverage, and 61.7 % were male. Neurologists prescribed 64.6 % of DA monotherapy, and 56.9 % of patients had ≥2 PD diagnoses before or on the index date. Index therapy was discontinued by 44.1 % of patients, and 55.9 % persisted for 12 months without change. Mean (SD) time to discontinuation was 102 (79) days. Mean (SD) MPR for patients (n = 562) with ≥2 fills was 0.84 (0.2); 70.3 % were MPR adherent. Mean (SD) PDC for all 642 patients was 0.66 (0.3); 50.5 % were PDC adherent.

Conclusion

Adherence and continuation of therapy were suboptimal, which could translate into poor patient outcomes. Future studies could provide insights on the impact of low adherence and persistence with DA monotherapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多巴胺激动剂单药治疗在帕金森病患者中的应用
目的描述开始多巴胺激动剂(DA)单药治疗的帕金森病(PD)患者,描述药物使用情况和提供者类型,并估计药物依从性和停药率。方法回顾性研究在Optum研究数据库中确定了PD患者,包括那些在2012年1月9日至2018年12月31日期间有≥1次DA或左旋多巴索赔、≥2次PD诊断、商业或医疗保险优势D部分(MAPD)保险、≥40岁、在指标日期前后连续医疗和药房保险≥12个月的患者。选择接受DA单药治疗的患者子集进行此分析。对变量进行描述性分析。通过药物占有率(MPR)和覆盖天数比例(PDC)测量依从性;结果642例患者的平均(SD)年龄为70.2(9.9)岁,70.6%的患者具有MAPD覆盖率,61.7%为男性。神经学家开出了64.6%的DA单药治疗处方,56.9%的患者在指标日期之前或当天有≥2例PD诊断。44.1%的患者停止了指数治疗,55.9%的患者坚持了12个月而没有改变。平均停药时间为102(79)天。填充≥2次的患者(n=562)的平均(SD)MPR为0.84(0.2);70.3%为MPR粘连。642名患者的平均PDC为0.66(0.3);PDC粘附占50.5%。结论坚持和继续治疗是次优的,这可能会转化为较差的患者结果。未来的研究可以深入了解DA单药治疗低依从性和持续性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Parkinsonism  Related Disorders
Clinical Parkinsonism Related Disorders Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
98 days
期刊最新文献
Meaning in life and Parkinson’s disease in the UK Biobank Validation of the Kazakh version of the movement disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale Movement disorder Deep brain stimulation Hybridization: Patient and caregiver outcomes Impulse control and related behavioral disorders (ICRD) in Idiopathic Parkinson’s Disease treated with different dopamine agonists in Hong Kong: Is any dopamine agonist better? Overview of management of infection-related movement disorders with focus on specific-infections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1